IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v76y2017icp87-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods for portfolio market risk

Author

Listed:
  • Sak, Halis
  • Başoğlu, İsmail

Abstract

We consider the problem of simulating loss probabilities and conditional excesses for linear asset portfolios under the t-copula model. Although in the literature on market risk management there are papers proposing efficient variance reduction methods for Monte Carlo simulation of portfolio market risk, there is no paper discussing combining the randomized quasi-Monte Carlo method with variance reduction techniques. In this paper, we combine the randomized quasi-Monte Carlo method with importance sampling and stratified importance sampling. Numerical results for realistic portfolio examples suggest that replacing pseudorandom numbers (Monte Carlo) with quasi-random sequences (quasi-Monte Carlo) in the simulations increases the robustness of the estimates once we reduce the effective dimension and the impact of the non-smoothness of the integrands.

Suggested Citation

  • Sak, Halis & Başoğlu, İsmail, 2017. "Efficient randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods for portfolio market risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 87-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:87-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016766871530250X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2011. "Efficient Risk Estimation via Nested Sequential Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1172-1194, June.
    2. Pierre Étoré & Benjamin Jourdain, 2010. "Adaptive Optimal Allocation in Stratified Sampling Methods," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 335-360, September.
    3. Xing Jin & Allen X. Zhang, 2006. "Reclaiming Quasi-Monte Carlo Efficiency in Portfolio Value-at-Risk Simulation Through Fourier Transform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 925-938, June.
    4. Sak, Halis & Hörmann, Wolfgang & Leydold, Josef, 2010. "Efficient risk simulations for linear asset portfolios in the t-copula model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 802-809, May.
    5. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    6. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2002. "Portfolio Value‐at‐Risk with Heavy‐Tailed Risk Factors," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 239-269, July.
    7. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 1999. "Asymptotically Optimal Importance Sampling and Stratification for Pricing Path‐Dependent Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 117-152, April.
    8. Sun Wei & Rachev Svetlozar & Stoyanov Stoyan V. & Fabozzi Frank J., 2008. "Multivariate Skewed Student's t Copula in the Analysis of Nonlinear and Asymmetric Dependence in the German Equity Market," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-37, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halis Sak & .Ismail Bac{s}ou{g}lu, 2015. "Efficient Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods For Portfolio Market Risk," Papers 1510.01593, arXiv.org.
    2. Xiaoqun Wang & Ken Seng Tan, 2013. "Pricing and Hedging with Discontinuous Functions: Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods and Dimension Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 376-389, July.
    3. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    4. Shih-Kuei Lin & Ren-Her Wang & Cheng-Der Fuh, 2006. "Risk Management for Linear and Non-Linear Assets: A Bootstrap Method with Importance Resampling to Evaluate Value-at-Risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 13(3), pages 261-295, September.
    5. Xiaoqun Wang & Ian H. Sloan, 2011. "Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 80-95, February.
    6. Dingeç, Kemal Dinçer & Hörmann, Wolfgang, 2013. "Control variates and conditional Monte Carlo for basket and Asian options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 421-434.
    7. Yu-Ying Tzeng & Paul M. Beaumont & Giray Ökten, 2018. "Time Series Simulation with Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods: An Application to Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 55-77, June.
    8. Huei-Wen Teng & Cheng-Der Fuh & Chun-Chieh Chen, 2016. "On an automatic and optimal importance sampling approach with applications in finance," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 1259-1271, August.
    9. Hatem Ben-Ameur & Michèle Breton & Pierre L'Ecuyer, 2002. "A Dynamic Programming Procedure for Pricing American-Style Asian Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 625-643, May.
    10. Fredrik Åkesson & John P. Lehoczky, 2000. "Path Generation for Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation of Mortgage-Backed Securities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1171-1187, September.
    11. Paul Glasserman & Jeremy Staum, 2001. "Conditioning on One-Step Survival for Barrier Option Simulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 923-937, December.
    12. Lu, King-Jeng & Liang, Chiung-Ju & Hsieh, Ming-Hua & Lee, Yi-Hsi, 2020. "An effective hybrid variance reduction method for pricing the Asian options and its variants," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    13. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    14. Sak Halis, 2010. "Increasing the number of inner replications of multifactor portfolio credit risk simulation in the t-copula model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3-4), pages 361-377, January.
    15. Bendera, Christian & Moseler, Thilo, 2008. "Importance sampling for backward SDEs," CoFE Discussion Papers 08/11, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    16. Sak, Halis & Hörmann, Wolfgang & Leydold, Josef, 2010. "Efficient risk simulations for linear asset portfolios in the t-copula model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 802-809, May.
    17. Han, Chulwoo & Park, Frank C., 2022. "A geometric framework for covariance dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Turvey, Calum G., 2001. "Random Walks And Fractal Structures In Agricultural Commodity Futures Prices," Working Papers 34151, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Marcel Wollschlager & Rudi Schafer, 2015. "Impact of non-stationarity on estimating and modeling empirical copulas of daily stock returns," Papers 1506.08054, arXiv.org.
    20. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:87-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.