IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v122y2025icp194-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal reinsurance from an optimal transport perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Acciaio, Beatrice
  • Albrecher, Hansjörg
  • Flores, Brandon García

Abstract

We use the randomization idea and proof techniques from optimal transport to study optimal reinsurance problems. We start by providing conditions for a class of problems that allow us to characterize the support of optimal treaties, and show how this can be used to deduce the shape of the optimal contract, reducing the task to an optimization problem with finitely many constraints, for which standard techniques can be applied. For a more general class of problems, we regard the optimal reinsurance problem as an iterated optimal transport problem between a (known) initial risk exposure of the insurer and an (unknown) resulting risk exposure of the reinsurer. The proposed approach provides a general framework that encompasses many reinsurance problems, which we illustrate in several concrete examples, providing alternative proofs to classical optimal reinsurance results, as well as establishing new optimality results, some of which contain optimal treaties that involve external randomness.

Suggested Citation

  • Acciaio, Beatrice & Albrecher, Hansjörg & Flores, Brandon García, 2025. "Optimal reinsurance from an optimal transport perspective," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 194-213.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:122:y:2025:i:c:p:194-213
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668725000411
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim J. Boonen & Ka Chun Cheung & Yiying Zhang, 2021. "Bowley reinsurance with asymmetric information on the insurer's risk preferences," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2021(7), pages 623-644, August.
    2. Deprez, Olivier & Gerber, Hans U., 1985. "On convex principles of premium calculation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 179-189, July.
    3. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Balbás, Raquel & Heras, Antonio, 2022. "Risk transference constraints in optimal reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 27-40.
    4. Guerra, M. & de Moura, A.B., 2021. "Reinsurance of multiple risks with generic dependence structures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 547-571.
    5. Asimit, Vali & Boonen, Tim J., 2018. "Insurance with multiple insurers: A game-theoretic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 778-790.
    6. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2008. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 185-196, August.
    7. K. C. Cheung & K. C. J. Sung & S. C. P. Yam, 2014. "Risk-Minimizing Reinsurance Protection For Multivariate Risks," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 81(1), pages 219-236, March.
    8. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "A marginal indemnity function approach to optimal reinsurance under the Vajda condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 928-944.
    9. Cheung, Ka Chun & He, Wanting & Wang, He, 2023. "Multi-constrained optimal reinsurance model from the duality perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 199-214.
    10. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2021. "Optimal reinsurance with multiple reinsurers: Distortion risk measures, distortion premium principles, and heterogeneous beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 23-37.
    11. Lo, Ambrose, 2017. "A Neyman-Pearson Perspective On Optimal Reinsurance With Constraints," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 467-499, May.
    12. Lesław Gajek & Dariusz Zagrodny, 2004. "Reinsurance Arrangements Maximizing Insurer's Survival Probability," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 71(3), pages 421-435, September.
    13. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2023. "Bowley vs. Pareto optima in reinsurance contracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 382-391.
    14. Marek Kaluszka, 2004. "Mean-Variance Optimal Reinsurance Arrangements," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2004(1), pages 28-41.
    15. Zhuang, Sheng Chao & Weng, Chengguo & Tan, Ken Seng & Assa, Hirbod, 2016. "Marginal Indemnification Function formulation for optimal reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 65-76.
    16. Vincent, Léonard & Albrecher, Hansjörg & Krvavych, Yuriy, 2021. "Structured reinsurance deals with reference to relative market performance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 125-139.
    17. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Balbás, Raquel & Heras, Antonio, 2015. "Optimal reinsurance under risk and uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 61-74.
    18. Manuel Guerra & Alexandra B. Moura, 2020. "Reinsurance of multiple risks with generic dependence structures," Papers 2009.12274, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    19. Guerra, Manuel & Centeno, M.L., 2012. "Are quantile risk measures suitable for risk-transfer decisions?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 446-461.
    20. Zhu, Michael B. & Ghossoub, Mario & Boonen, Tim J., 2023. "Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 24-49.
    21. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Badescu, Alexandru M. & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance in the presence of counterparty default risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 690-697.
    22. Yong, Yaodi & Cheung, Ka Chun & Zhang, Yiying, 2024. "Optimal reinsurance design under distortion risk measures and reinsurer’s default risk with partial recovery," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 738-766, September.
    23. Ching-Ping Wang & David Shyu & Hung-Hsi Huang, 2005. "Optimal Insurance Design Under a Value-at-Risk Framework," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 30(2), pages 161-179, December.
    24. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Boonen, Tim J. & Chi, Yichun & Chong, Wing Fung, 2021. "Risk sharing with multiple indemnity environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 587-603.
    25. Ching-Ping Wang & David Shyu & Hung-Hsi Huang, 2005. "Optimal Insurance Design Under a Value-at-Risk Framework," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Springer;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 30(2), pages 161-179, December.
    26. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Cani, Arian, 2019. "On randomized reinsurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 67-78.
    27. K.C. Cheung & K.C.J. Sung & S.C.P. Yam & S.P. Yung, 2014. "Optimal reinsurance under general law-invariant risk measures," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2014(1), pages 72-91.
    28. Ka Chun Cheung & Ambrose Lo, 2017. "Characterizations of optimal reinsurance treaties: a cost-benefit approach," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2017(1), pages 1-28, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheung, Ka Chun & He, Wanting & Wang, He, 2023. "Multi-constrained optimal reinsurance model from the duality perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 199-214.
    2. Chen, Yanhong & Cheung, Ka Chun & Zhang, Yiying, 2024. "Bowley solution under the reinsurer's default risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 36-61.
    3. Tim J. Boonen & Wing Fung Chong & Mario Ghossoub, 2024. "Pareto‐efficient risk sharing in centralized insurance markets with application to flood risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(2), pages 449-488, June.
    4. Chi, Yichun & Hu, Tao & Huang, Yuxia, 2023. "Optimal risk management with reinsurance and its counterparty risk hedging," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 274-292.
    5. Cheung, Ka Chun & Phillip Yam, Sheung Chi & Yuen, Fei Lung & Zhang, Yiying, 2020. "Concave distortion risk minimizing reinsurance design under adverse selection," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 155-165.
    6. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2025. "Pareto-optimal insurance under robust distortion risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(2), pages 690-705.
    7. Aboagye, Ernest & Asimit, Vali & Fung, Tsz Chai & Peng, Liang & Wang, Qiuqi, 2025. "A revisit of the optimal excess-of-loss contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(1), pages 341-354.
    8. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "A marginal indemnity function approach to optimal reinsurance under the Vajda condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 928-944.
    9. Zhu, Michael B. & Ghossoub, Mario & Boonen, Tim J., 2023. "Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 24-49.
    10. Guerra, M. & de Moura, A.B., 2021. "Reinsurance of multiple risks with generic dependence structures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 547-571.
    11. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Cheung, Ka Chun & Chong, Wing Fung & Hu, Junlei, 2020. "Pareto-optimal insurance contracts with premium budget and minimum charge constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 17-27.
    12. Guerra, Manuel & Centeno, M.L., 2012. "Are quantile risk measures suitable for risk-transfer decisions?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 446-461.
    13. Ghossoub, Mario & Li, Bin & Shi, Benxuan, 2025. "Bowley-optimal convex-loaded premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 157-180.
    14. Mario Ghossoub & Michael B. Zhu & Wing Fung Chong, 2024. "Pareto-Optimal Peer-to-Peer Risk Sharing with Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2409.05103, arXiv.org.
    15. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Cani, Arian, 2019. "On randomized reinsurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 67-78.
    16. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2024. "Robust insurance design with distortion risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 694-706.
    17. Ernest Aboagye & Vali Asimit & Tsz Chai Fung & Liang Peng & Qiuqi Wang, 2024. "A Revisit of the Optimal Excess-of-Loss Contract," Papers 2405.00188, arXiv.org.
    18. Ghossoub, Mario & Zhu, Michael B., 2024. "Stackelberg equilibria with multiple policyholders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 189-201.
    19. Zhou, Chunyang & Wu, Chongfeng, 2008. "Optimal insurance under the insurer's risk constraint," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 992-999, June.
    20. Birghila, Corina & Pflug, Georg Ch., 2019. "Optimal XL-insurance under Wasserstein-type ambiguity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 30-43.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:122:y:2025:i:c:p:194-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.