IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v18y2024i1s1751157723000925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing semantic text similarity with functional semantic knowledge (FOP) in patents

Author

Listed:
  • Teng, Hao
  • Wang, Nan
  • Zhao, Hongyu
  • Hu, Yingtong
  • Jin, Haitao

Abstract

The semantic text similarity (STS) estimation between patents is a critical issue for the patent portfolio analysis. Current methods such as keywords, co-word analysis and even the Subject-Action-Object (SAO) algorithms, are not quite reasonable for the patent similarity calculation due to the lack of fine-grained semantic knowledge, “property-parameter” features and flexible “functional or non-functional” combinations. In the meanwhile, standardized similarity datasets are also unavailable. In this paper, we have proposed a new kind of functional semantic knowledge (Function-Object-Property, i.e., FOP) instead of SAO triples, which can contribute directly to enhance the patent similarity. Moreover, patent STS datasets, including the matching dataset and the ranking dataset, have firstly been processed and released as benchmarks for the comparative evaluation. Preliminary results have demonstrated that FOP-based methods are more appropriate in the STS tasks incorporated with IPC codes, weights’ assignments and patent pre-trained vectors. To be further, the deep interaction-based models with the averaged FOP embeddings are recommended to be one of the most optimal choices of effectively improving the semantic learning capability. Finally, a new patent similarity calculation framework is summarized and successfully applied in the patent retrieval, which highlight that the proposed methodology serves as a dominant power in diverse patented STS tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng, Hao & Wang, Nan & Zhao, Hongyu & Hu, Yingtong & Jin, Haitao, 2024. "Enhancing semantic text similarity with functional semantic knowledge (FOP) in patents," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:1:s1751157723000925
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2023.101467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157723000925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:1:s1751157723000925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.