IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v17y2023i4s1751157723000792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploratory study of Twitter metrics for measuring user influence

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Min
  • Zhang, Dongxin
  • Zhang, Yin
  • Yeager, Kristin
  • Fields, Taylor N.

Abstract

Influence plays a critical role in information communication, and the ubiquitous use of social media has made measuring influence on social media platforms a salient challenge. While previous studies have attempted to measure and investigate influence on Twitter, there is no consensus on its definition or relation to fundamental Twitter metrics. This study examined relationships between a composite influence measure of Twitter and fundamental social media metrics using a sample of tweets from a multi-year public campaign. Correlation analyses indicated that a user's number of followers had the strongest correlation with the composite measure. Principal components analysis was conducted for dimension reduction, and multiple regression analysis was performed using the resulting components. The findings revealed that a user's network was the most important predictor of the composite influence measure and that there was a negative relationship between campaign related activity and the composite measure. Implications of these findings are discussed. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of and future efforts in the measurement of influence on social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Min & Zhang, Dongxin & Zhang, Yin & Yeager, Kristin & Fields, Taylor N., 2023. "An exploratory study of Twitter metrics for measuring user influence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:17:y:2023:i:4:s1751157723000792
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2023.101454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157723000792
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:17:y:2023:i:4:s1751157723000792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.