IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissemination of effectiveness and outcomes research


  • Kanouse, David E.
  • Kallich, Joel D.
  • Kahan, James P.


No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanouse, David E. & Kallich, Joel D. & Kahan, James P., 1995. "Dissemination of effectiveness and outcomes research," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 167-192, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:34:y:1995:i:3:p:167-192

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Klazinga, N. S. & Casparie, A. F. & van Everdingen, J. J. E., 1987. "Contribution of medical decision-making to consensus development conferences," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 339-346, December.
    2. Domnick Pierre, Karin & Vayda, Eugene & Lomas, Jonathan & Enkin, Murray W. & Hannah, Walter J. & Anderson, Geoff M., 1991. "Obstetrical attitudes and practices before and after the Canadian consensus conference statement on cesarean birth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 1283-1289, January.
    3. J Lomas & G Anderson & M Enkin, 1988. "The Role of Evidence in the Consensus Process: Results from a Canadian Consensus Exercise," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 3, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
    4. repec:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:9:1190-1194_3 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Fattore, Giovanni & Frosini, Francesca & Salvatore, Domenico & Tozzi, Valeria, 2009. "Social network analysis in primary care: The impact of interactions on prescribing behaviour," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(2-3), pages 141-148, October.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:34:y:1995:i:3:p:167-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu) or (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.