IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v91y2024ics1057521923005665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hyperbole or reality? The effect of auditors' AI education on audit report timeliness

Author

Listed:
  • Liao, Fang-nan
  • Zhang, Chuancai
  • Zhang, Jin-jin
  • Yan, Xiang
  • Chen, Tian-xiang

Abstract

We manually collect data on auditors with artificial intelligence (AI) educational backgrounds comprising 8201 company-year observations of A-share listed companies in China between 2014 and 2020. We then develop an auditor individual-level setting to investigate the role of AI education in audit report timeliness. Results show auditors with AI educational backgrounds are negatively and significantly associated with audit report lag, indicating auditors with AI education can shorten annual audit report times by using programming, applied technology, and logical-thinking skills, thereby enhancing audit report timeliness. In addition, this timeliness effect is more pronounced in accounting firms with more branches and among state-owned enterprises, and higher-risk clients. Furthermore, AI education and Certified Public Accountant status can complementarily strengthen this effect, particularly in companies with higher client portfolio risk. Our results provide evidence that auditors with AI education play an important role in audit report timeliness reality and not hyperbole, which supports the efficiency view, and the understanding potential unintended consequences of auditors' AI education could be of interest to regulators that plan to develop new liberal arts framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Liao, Fang-nan & Zhang, Chuancai & Zhang, Jin-jin & Yan, Xiang & Chen, Tian-xiang, 2024. "Hyperbole or reality? The effect of auditors' AI education on audit report timeliness," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923005665
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923005665
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923005665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.