IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v15y1997i4p423-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic perspectives on European cross-border acquisitions: A view from top European executives

Author

Listed:
  • Angwin, Duncan
  • Savill, Brett

Abstract

European cross-border activity has increased tenfold in value over the last ten years and yet there are few studies of this important phenomenon. This study provides an up-to-the-minute view of European top managers' perceptions of key strategic issues; whether acquiring in Europe is still a strategic priority, the advantages and disadvantages of using crossborder acquisitions, what makes a good target and in what ways advisors can assist in the process. We interviewed 142 top executives of large European acquirers in the six nations most active in cross-border acquisitions. They suggest that Europe is still a strategic priority and that crossborder acquisitions offer several advantages. However, they are perceived as risky, and this risk is largely internal in nature. This perception was linked to familiarity and experience. The dominant acquirer in Europe, the UK, appears to have a significantly different approach to managing these risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Angwin, Duncan & Savill, Brett, 1997. "Strategic perspectives on European cross-border acquisitions: A view from top European executives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 423-435, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:423-435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237397000212
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angwin, Duncan, 2001. "Mergers and acquisitions across European borders: National perspectives on preacquisition due diligence and the use of professional advisers," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 32-57, April.
    2. Durand, Muriel, 2016. "Employing critical incident technique as one way to display the hidden aspects of post-merger integration," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 87-102.
    3. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Glaister, Keith W., 2013. "The pre-acquisition evaluation of target firms and cross border acquisition performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 894-904.
    4. Bauer, Florian & King, David & Matzler, Kurt, 2016. "Speed of acquisition integration: Separating the role of human and task integration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 150-165.
    5. Wafa Tariq Waqar & Yan Ma, 2024. "Acquirers’ corporate governance ratings and the likelihood of deal completion: Do stakeholders care about the agency hazards of European cross-border acquirers?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2815-2848, October.
    6. Diana W.P. Kwok, 2018. "Boundary spanning and subordinate—leader trust: A tale of two acquisitions in a multicultural emerging economy," Post-Print hal-01744451, HAL.
    7. Ott, Christian, 2020. "The risks of mergers and acquisitions—Analyzing the incentives for risk reporting in Item 1A of 10-K filings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 158-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:423-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.