IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v72y2019icp162-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation and evaluation of a biotechnology research experience for African-American high school students

Author

Listed:
  • Boyce, Ayesha S.
  • Avent, Cherie
  • Adetogun, Adeyemo
  • Servance, Lakeita
  • DeStefano, Lizanne
  • Nerem, Robert
  • Platt, Manu O.

Abstract

Exposure to science content and development of excitement for scientific inquiry throughout the high school years are imperative in attracting students into the sciences. The purpose of this article is to report lessons learned and share best practices from the implementation and evaluation of a high school STEM program that aims to provide an authentic research experience for African-American students and expose them to the possibility and benefits of attaining advanced degrees and careers in STEM fields. Participants reported that enriching science experiences improved their college readiness and exposed them to STEM degree and career options. Formative evaluation results lead to the following lessons learned for best practice: 1) Relationships with high schools will facilitate buy-in; 2) Setting clear expectations and assigning responsibilities is essential; 3) Diversity and cultural sensitivity training is necessary; and 4) Programs of this nature need strong evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyce, Ayesha S. & Avent, Cherie & Adetogun, Adeyemo & Servance, Lakeita & DeStefano, Lizanne & Nerem, Robert & Platt, Manu O., 2019. "Implementation and evaluation of a biotechnology research experience for African-American high school students," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 162-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:72:y:2019:i:c:p:162-169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917303452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorena M Salto & Matt L Riggs & Daisy Delgado De Leon & Carlos A Casiano & Marino De Leon, 2014. "Underrepresented Minority High School and College Students Report STEM-Pipeline Sustaining Gains After Participating in the Loma Linda University Summer Health Disparities Research Program," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Chad Loes & Ernest Pascarella & Paul Umbach, 2012. "Effects of Diversity Experiences on Critical Thinking Skills: Who Benefits?," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Boyce, Ayesha S., 2017. "Lessons learned using a values-engaged approach to attend to culture, diversity, and equity in a STEM program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 33-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Bogdan Drăgan & Andrei Alexandru Panait & George Cristian Schin, 2022. "Tracking precursors of entrepreneurial intention: the case of researchers involved in eco-label industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1605-1622, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Josipa Roksa & Teniell L. Trolian & Ernest T. Pascarella & Cindy A. Kilgo & Charles Blaich & Kathleen S. Wise, 2017. "Racial Inequality in Critical Thinking Skills: The Role of Academic and Diversity Experiences," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(2), pages 119-140, March.
    3. Gates, Emily F. & Madres, Joseph & Hall, Jori N. & Alvarez, Kayla Benitez, 2022. "It takes an ecosystem: Socioecological factors influencing equity-oriented evaluation in New England, U.S., 2021," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. McKendall, Sherron Benson & McKendall, Alan & Chester, Ann, 2023. "The development and validation of an academic, work health sciences, and community intentions scale for out-of-school-time (OST) participants," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Haijiao Chen & Yuting Tang & Jinghe Han, 2022. "Building Students’ Entrepreneurial Competencies in Chinese Universities: Diverse Learning Environment, Knowledge Transfer, and Entrepreneurship Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Rishita Bhatt & Bernadette West & Sunita Chaudhary, 2020. "Biomedical career enrichment programs: Exploring women and minority participants’ motivators and outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.
    7. Shi Pu & Yu Yan & Liang Zhang, 2020. "Peers, Study Effort, and Academic Performance in College Education: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Roommates in a Flipped Classroom," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 248-269, March.
    8. Eric A. Vance & Erin Tanenbaum & Amarjot Kaur & Mark C. Otto & Richard Morris, 2017. "An Eight-Step Guide to Creating and Sustaining a Mentoring Program," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 23-29, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:72:y:2019:i:c:p:162-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.