Employing policy and purchasing levers to increase the use of evidence-based practices in community-based substance abuse treatment settings: Reports from single state authorities
State public health authorities are critical to the successful implementation of science based addiction treatment practices by community-based providers. The literature to date, however, lacks examples of state level policy strategies that promote evidence-based practices (EBPs). This mixed-methods study documents changes in two critical state-to-provider strategies aimed at accelerating use of evidence-based practices: purchasing levers (financial incentives and mechanisms) and policy or regulatory levers. A sample of 51 state representatives was interviewed. Single State Authorities for substance abuse treatment (SSAs) that fund providers directly or through managed care were significantly more likely to have contracts that required or encouraged evidence-based interventions, as compared to SSAs that fund providers indirectly through sub-state entities. Policy levers included EBP-related legislation, language in rules and regulations, and evidence-based criteria in state plans and standards. These differences in state policy are likely to result in significant state level variations regarding both the extent to which EBPs are implemented by community-based treatment providers and the quality of implementation.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Rugs, Deborah & Hills, Holly A. & Moore, Kathleen A. & Peters, Roger H., 2011. "A community planning process for the implementation of evidence-based practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 29-36, February.
- Shannon, Lisa M. & Walker, Robert & Blevins, Michele, 2009. "Developing a new system to measure outcomes in a service coordination program for youth with severe emotional disturbance," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 109-118, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:34:y:2011:i:4:p:366-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.