IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v32y2009i2p99-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tales from the frontline: The experiences of early childhood practitioners working with an [`]embedded' research team

Author

Listed:
  • Wong, Sandie

Abstract

In late 2006, SDN Children's Services, an Australian not-for-profit provider of services for children, families and communities, engaged a research team that was [`]embedded' within the organisation for 1 year. This action represented a significant investment of resources, such as staff time and organisational funds, and demonstrates SDN's strong commitment to research and evaluation as a means of supporting organisational learning and development. This paper highlights the innovative nature of the approach by positioning the role of the embedded researcher within the current theoretical and socio-political context. It also provides evidence of the success of the approach by reporting on the findings of a study that investigated staff's experiences of being involved in this type of collaborative investigation of their work. I argue that the employment of an embedded researcher can have positive benefits both for the organisation and the practitioners--but who the researchers are really matters.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong, Sandie, 2009. "Tales from the frontline: The experiences of early childhood practitioners working with an [`]embedded' research team," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-108, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:2:p:99-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(08)00104-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O'Sullivan, Rita G. & O'Sullivan, John M., 1998. "Evaluation Voices: Promoting evaluation from within programs through collaboration," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 21-29, February.
    2. Stevenson, John F. & Florin, Paul & Mills, Dana Scott & Andrade, Marco, 2002. "Building evaluation capacity in human service organizations: a case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 233-243, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom Pape, 2020. "Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources," Papers 2012.13813, arXiv.org.
    2. Hasselbalch, Gry, 2019. "Making sense of data ethics. The powers behind the data ethics debate in European policymaking," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19.
    3. Ebenso, Bassey & Manzano, Ana & Uzochukwu, Benjamin & Etiaba, Enyi & Huss, Reinhard & Ensor, Tim & Newell, James & Onwujekwe, Obinna & Ezumah, Nkoli & Hicks, Joe & Mirzoev, Tolib, 2019. "Dealing with context in logic model development: Reflections from a realist evaluation of a community health worker programme in Nigeria," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 97-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar Chaudhary, Anil & Diaz, John & Jayaratne, K.S.U. & Assan, Elsie, 2020. "Evaluation capacity building in the nonformal education context: Challenges and strategies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Andrews, Arlene Bowers, 2004. "Start at the end: empowerment evaluation product planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 275-285, August.
    3. Tseng, Shu-Hui, 2011. "An assessment scale of ECB: Perspectives from the faculty and staff of technical colleges in Taiwan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 154-159, May.
    4. Bjerke, May Britt & Renger, Ralph, 2017. "Being smart about writing SMART objectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 125-127.
    5. Chilenski, Sarah M. & Perkins, Daniel F. & Olson, Jonathan & Hoffman, Lesa & Feinberg, Mark E. & Greenberg, Mark & Welsh, Janet & Crowley, D. Max & Spoth, Richard, 2016. "The power of a collaborative relationship between technical assistance providers and community prevention teams: A correlational and longitudinal study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 19-29.
    6. Johnson, Robert L. & Fisher, Steve & Willeke, Marjorie J. & McDaniel, Fred, 2003. "Portfolio assessment in a collaborative program evaluation: the reliability and validity of a family literacy portfolio," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 367-377, November.
    7. Naccarella, Lucio & Pirkis, Jane & Kohn, Fay & Morley, Belinda & Burgess, Philip & Blashki, Grant, 2007. "Building evaluation capacity: Definitional and practical implications from an Australian case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 231-236, August.
    8. Diaz, John & Chaudhary, Anil Kumar & Jayaratne, K.S.U. & Assan, Elsie, 2020. "Expanding evaluator competency research: Exploring competencies for program evaluation using the context of non-formal education," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    10. Hishamuddin bin Md.Som & Roland Yeow Theng Nam & Rashid Nordin & Mohd Naeim Ajis & Mohamad Faisol Keling & Md. Shukri Shuib, 2011. "The Implementation of Learning Organization Elements and their Impact towards Organizational Performance amongst NPOs in Singapore," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 5(1), pages 1-50, December.
    11. Satterlund, Travis D. & Treiber, Jeanette & Kipke, Robin & Kwon, Nicole & Cassady, Diana, 2013. "Accommodating diverse clients’ needs in evaluation capacity building: A case study of the Tobacco Control Evaluation Center," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 49-55.
    12. Ploeg, Jenny & de Witt, Lorna & Hutchison, Brian & Hayward, Lynda & Grayson, Kim, 2008. "Evaluation of a research mentorship program in community care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 22-33, February.
    13. Nichols, Laura, 2002. "Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:2:p:99-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.