IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v313y2024ics0360544224035576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of biogas productivity from distillery wastewater by partial potassium reduction pretreatment using two-step microfiltration and nanofiltration

Author

Listed:
  • Seneesrisakul, Kessara
  • Kunta, Kittitut
  • Pornmai, Krittiya
  • Abe, Masahiko
  • Ariyamethee, Prapan
  • Boonayamanop, Tanakorn
  • Chavadej, Sumaeth

Abstract

The main purpose of the current study was to employ filtration pretreatment to lower the K concentration in distillery wastewater (DW) from a very high level (8800 mg/L) close to severe inhibition (>12000 mg/L) to 4350 mg/L, which was in the moderate toxic range (2500–4500 mg/L) for methanogens. The filtration pretreatment system consisted of the two steps of microfiltration (MF) to remove large solid particles and nanofiltration (NF) to reduce K concentration in the retained DW. Both steps of MF and NF were operated in batch mode with continuous recirculation. The permeate of the MF step was fed to the NF unit in conjunction with different dilution ratios (dilution water volume-to-feed volume) to lower the K content in the retentate. The higher the cumulative dilution ratio, the lower the K concentration in the retentate of the NF step. However, it has to be traded off against the increasing total volume of permeate with the higher cumulative dilution ratio. Thus, at the optimum cumulative dilution ratio of 0.5:1, the DW from filtration pretreatment with a high COD value of 111500 mg/L and a low K content of 4350 mg/L was found to have significantly higher methanogenic productivities in terms of average production rate and yields of both biogas and methane with a higher optimum COD loading rate, as compared to those of the untreated DW. Moreover, the use of the two-step filtration in this investigation could significantly lower the dilution ratio as compared to the sole dilution method (0.5:1 against 2:1).

Suggested Citation

  • Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Kunta, Kittitut & Pornmai, Krittiya & Abe, Masahiko & Ariyamethee, Prapan & Boonayamanop, Tanakorn & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2024. "Improvement of biogas productivity from distillery wastewater by partial potassium reduction pretreatment using two-step microfiltration and nanofiltration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224035576
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224035576
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Jantaruksa, Todsapon & Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Pornmai, Krittiya & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2021. "Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Gunes, Burcu & Stokes, Joseph & Davis, Paul & Connolly, Cathal & Lawler, Jenny, 2019. "Pre-treatments to enhance biogas yield and quality from anaerobic digestion of whiskey distillery and brewery wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shanshan Zhao & Mingsen Qin & Xia Yang & Wenke Bai & Yunfeng Yao & Junqiang Wang, 2023. "Freeze–Thaw Cycles Have More of an Effect on Greenhouse Gas Fluxes than Soil Water Content on the Eastern Edge of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Anna Nowicka & Magda Dudek, 2024. "Optimisation of Biogas Production in the Co-Digestion of Pre-Hydrodynamically Cavitated Aerobic Granular Sludge with Waste Fats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Achiraya Jiraprasertwong & Kornpong Vichaitanapat & Malinee Leethochawalit & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "Three-Stage Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor (ASBR) for Maximum Methane Production: Effects of COD Loading Rate and Reactor Volumetric Ratio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Otton K. Roubinek & Anna Wilinska-Lisowska & Magdalena Jasinska & Andrzej G. Chmielewski & Krzysztof Czerwionka, 2023. "Production of Biogas from Distillation Residue as a Waste Material from the Distillery Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Poblete, Israel Bernardo S. & Araujo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic analysis of sustainable biogas-combined-cycle plant: Time-varying demand and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Paulinetti, Ana Paula & Batista, Lia Paula Poloni & Lazaro, Carolina Zampol & Albanez, Roberta & Ratusznei, Suzana Maria & Lovato, Giovanna & Rodrigues, José Alberto Domingues, 2023. "Treatment of soybean processing residues for energy recovery and environmental compliance: Technical and economic feasibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.
    8. Gunes, Burcu, 2021. "A critical review on biofilm-based reactor systems for enhanced syngas fermentation processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Annalisa De Boni & Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Maria De Angelis & Fabio Minervini, 2022. "Challenges for a Sustainable Food Supply Chain: A Review on Food Losses and Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Gao, Zhenghui & Alshehri, Khaled & Li, Yuan & Qian, Hang & Sapsford, Devin & Cleall, Peter & Harbottle, Michael, 2022. "Advances in biological techniques for sustainable lignocellulosic waste utilization in biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Dimitar Karakashev & Yifeng Zhang, 2018. "BioEnergy and BioChemicals Production from Biomass and Residual Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-6, August.
    14. Susanne Theuerl & Johanna Klang & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "Process Disturbances in Agricultural Biogas Production—Causes, Mechanisms and Effects on the Biogas Microbiome: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Jantaruksa, Todsapon & Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Pornmai, Krittiya & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2021. "Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Aleksandra Szaja & Agnieszka Montusiewicz & Magdalena Lebiocka, 2021. "The Energetic Aspect of Organic Wastes Addition on Sewage Sludge Anaerobic Digestion: A Laboratory Investigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Yao, Yao & Huang, Gordon & An, Chunjiang & Chen, Xiujuan & Zhang, Peng & Xin, Xiaying & Jian Shen, & Agnew, Joy, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions: Technological advancements and global impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224035576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.