IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v28y2003i7p721-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative energy demand (CED) and cumulative CO2 emissions for products of the organic chemical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Patel, M.

Abstract

This paper both presents and discusses the results of calculations on the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and the related Cumulative CO2 emissions (CCO2) for products of the organic chemical industry. The entire process chain is studied, starting with the extraction of resources and ending with the saleable material (cradle-to-factory gate). The materials studied are chemical intermediates and plastics as produced in Germany in the mid 1990s. The two bulk plastics, polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride, belong to the group of polymers that can be produced with a relatively low input of energy resources. By contrast, the CED and the CCO2 values for manufacturing engineering and special plastics can be more than twice as high. The CED and CCO2 data determined on the basis of our calculations is compared with data from other sources. The differences show that for a reliable study it is essential that use is made of only one set of data which has been determined in a consistent manner. In contrast, comparative assessments which use CED and CCO2 data originating from various sources, can easily result in distorted conclusions given the large data ranges. The data ranges found indicate that considerable uncertainties continue to exist, calling for further analysis in the area. Comparative calculations using CED and CCO2 data from independent, consistent sources are recommended for the time being.

Suggested Citation

  • Patel, M., 2003. "Cumulative energy demand (CED) and cumulative CO2 emissions for products of the organic chemical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 721-740.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:28:y:2003:i:7:p:721-740
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00166-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544202001664
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00166-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Worrell, E. & van Heijningen, R.J.J. & de Castro, J.F.M. & Hazewinkel, J.H.O. & de Beer, J.G. & Faaij, A.P.C. & Vringer, K., 1994. "New gross energy-requirement figures for materials production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 627-640.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    2. Neelis, Maarten & Patel, Martin & Bach, Pieter & Blok, Kornelis, 2009. "Analysis of energy use and carbon losses in the chemical industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(7-8), pages 853-862, July.
    3. Neelis, Maarten & Ramirez-Ramirez, Andrea & Patel, Martin & Farla, Jacco & Boonekamp, Piet & Blok, Kornelis, 2007. "Energy efficiency developments in the Dutch energy-intensive manufacturing industry, 1980-2003," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6112-6131, December.
    4. Ozalp, Nesrin & Hyman, Barry, 2007. "Allocation of energy inputs among the end-uses in the US petroleum and coal products industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1460-1470.
    5. Carlos E. Gómez-Camacho & Bernardo Ruggeri, 2019. "Energy Sustainability Analysis (ESA) of Energy-Producing Processes: A Case Study on Distributed H 2 Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Neelis, Maarten & Patel, Martin & Blok, Kornelis & Haije, Wim & Bach, Pieter, 2007. "Approximation of theoretical energy-saving potentials for the petrochemical industry using energy balances for 68 key processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1104-1123.
    7. Sofia Russo & Alicia Valero & Antonio Valero & Marta Iglesias-Émbil, 2021. "Exergy-Based Assessment of Polymers Production and Recycling: An Application to the Automotive Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Mattia Rapa & Laura Gobbi & Roberto Ruggieri, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Fahd, S. & Fiorentino, G. & Mellino, S. & Ulgiati, S., 2012. "Cropping bioenergy and biomaterials in marginal land: The added value of the biorefinery concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 79-93.
    10. Ren, Tao & Patel, Martin K. & Blok, Kornelis, 2008. "Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 817-833.
    11. Rebekka Volk & Christoph Stallkamp & Justus J. Steins & Savina Padumane Yogish & Richard C. Müller & Dieter Stapf & Frank Schultmann, 2021. "Techno‐economic assessment and comparison of different plastic recycling pathways: A German case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1318-1337, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ke, Jing & Price, Lynn & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan, 2013. "Analysis and practices of energy benchmarking for industry from the perspective of systems engineering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 32-44.
    2. Stoppato, A., 2008. "Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 224-232.
    3. Laurijssen, Jobien & Marsidi, Marc & Westenbroek, Annita & Worrell, Ernst & Faaij, Andre, 2010. "Paper and biomass for energy?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1208-1218.
    4. Zhao, Yue & Ke, Jing & Ni, Chun Chun & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan & Fridley, David & Li, Qiqiang, 2014. "A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-56.
    5. Farla, Jacco & Cuelenaere11, Rob & Blok, Kornelis, 1998. "Energy efficiency and structural change in the Netherlands, 1980-1990," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Buonocore, Elvira & Paletto, Alessandro & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2017. "Wood-based bioenergy value chain in mountain urban districts: An integrated environmental accounting framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 197-210.
    7. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2012. "Effect of thermal mass on life cycle primary energy balances of a concrete- and a wood-frame building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 462-472.
    8. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2009. "Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 276-286.
    9. Corsten, Mariëlle & Worrell, Ernst & Rouw, Magda & van Duin, Armande, 2013. "The potential contribution of sustainable waste management to energy use and greenhouse gas emission reduction in the Netherlands," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 13-21.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:28:y:2003:i:7:p:721-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.