IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v237y2021ics0360544221016753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical analysis of the aerothermodynamic behavior of a Hyperloop in choked flow

Author

Listed:
  • Sui, Yang
  • Niu, Jiqiang
  • Yu, Qiujun
  • Yuan, Yanping
  • Cao, Xiaoling
  • Yang, Xiaofeng

Abstract

The Hyperloop is a form of ultra-high-speed transportation system subject to complex fluid dynamic regimes, such as choked flow. This study investigates the aerothermodynamic behavior of the Hyperloop in a choked flow structure using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A vehicular movement model of the Hyperloop was constructed to simulate the relative motion of the pod and tube. The CFD algorithm has been previously verified via experiment data and numerical simulation. The flow structure around the Hyperloop pod and the causes of the significant temperature and pressure differences were studied. A series of complex phenomena occur in the choked region, including choked flow, shock waves, and expansion waves. The blockage ratio and pod velocity increase, widening the temperature and pressure differences across the Hyperloop tube and increasing the total temperature and pressure in the tube. The initial pressure of the tube promotes the formation of the aerodynamic environment, but has no significant effect on the temperature. Aerodynamic drag is a key performance characteristic of the Hyperloop, and the influence of three aerodynamic parameters (blockage ratio, Hyperloop pod velocity and initial tube pressure) is positively correlated with drag. With the decrease in initial tube pressure, the decrease in aerodynamic drag decelerates. Engineers could control aerodynamic drag using a low initial tube pressure and minimizing the blockage ratio, which helps improve the Hyperloop's velocity and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sui, Yang & Niu, Jiqiang & Yu, Qiujun & Yuan, Yanping & Cao, Xiaoling & Yang, Xiaofeng, 2021. "Numerical analysis of the aerothermodynamic behavior of a Hyperloop in choked flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221016753
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221016753
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Xuesong & Mao, Baohua & Feng, Xujie & Feng, Jia, 2011. "Study on the maximum operation speeds of metro trains for energy saving as well as transport efficiency improvement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6577-6582.
    2. Shooshtari, S.H. Rajaee & Shahsavand, A., 2017. "Maximization of energy recovery inside supersonic separator in the presence of condensation and normal shock wave," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 153-163.
    3. Jae-Sung Oh & Taehak Kang & Seokgyun Ham & Kwan-Sup Lee & Yong-Jun Jang & Hong-Sun Ryou & Jaiyoung Ryu, 2019. "Numerical Analysis of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Hyperloop System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Lamberts, Olivier & Chatelain, Philippe & Bourgeois, Nicolas & Bartosiewicz, Yann, 2018. "The compound-choking theory as an explanation of the entrainment limitation in supersonic ejectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 524-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Yeran & Yang, Lixing & Tang, Tao & Gao, Ziyou & Cao, Fang, 2017. "Joint train scheduling optimization with service quality and energy efficiency in urban rail transit networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1124-1147.
    2. Barone, Giovanni & Buonomano, Annamaria & Forzano, Cesare & Palombo, Adolfo, 2020. "Enhancing trains envelope – heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems: A new dynamic simulation approach for energy, economic, environmental impact and thermal comfort analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Jerzy Kisilowski & Rafał Kowalik, 2020. "Displacements of the Levitation Systems in the Vehicle Hyperloop," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Wang, Kai & Wang, Lei & Gao, Rui, 2023. "An extended mechanism model of gaseous ejectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Ding, Hongbing & Zhang, Yu & Sun, Chunqian & Yang, Yan & Wen, Chuang, 2022. "Numerical simulation of supersonic condensation flows using Eulerian-Lagrangian and Eulerian wall film models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Thanh Dam Mai & Jaiyoung Ryu, 2021. "Effects of Damaged Rotor Blades on the Aerodynamic Behavior and Heat-Transfer Characteristics of High-Pressure Gas Turbines," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Wang, Jinghui & Rakha, Hesham A., 2017. "Electric train energy consumption modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 346-355.
    8. Besagni, Giorgio, 2019. "Ejectors on the cutting edge: The past, the present and the perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 998-1003.
    9. Bian, Jiang & Cao, Xuewen & Yang, Wen & Edem, Mawugbe Ayivi & Yin, Pengbo & Jiang, Wenming, 2018. "Supersonic liquefaction properties of natural gas in the Laval nozzle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 706-715.
    10. Mohammed Abdulla & Khalid A. Juhany, 2022. "A Rapid Solver for the Prediction of Flow-Field of High-Speed Vehicle Moving in a Tube," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Xuesong Feng & Hanxiao Zhang & Yong Ding & Zhili Liu & Hongqin Peng & Bin Xu, 2013. "A Review Study on Traction Energy Saving of Rail Transport," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, September.
    12. Lambros Mitropoulos & Annie Kortsari & Alexandros Koliatos & Georgia Ayfantopoulou, 2021. "The Hyperloop System and Stakeholders: A Review and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Tomita, Masaru & Suzuki, Kenji & Fukumoto, Yusuke & Ishihara, Atsushi & Akasaka, Tomoyuki & Kobayashi, Yusuke, 2017. "Energy-saving railway systems based on superconducting power transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 579-587.
    14. Croquer, Sergio & Fang, Yu & Metsue, Antoine & Bartosiewicz, Yann & Poncet, Sébastien, 2021. "Compound-choking theory for supersonic ejectors working with real gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Thi Thanh Giang Le & Kyeong Sik Jang & Kwan-Sup Lee & Jaiyoung Ryu, 2020. "Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Drag and Pressure Waves in Hyperloop Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Metsue, Antoine & Debroeyer, Romain & Poncet, Sébastien & Bartosiewicz, Yann, 2022. "An improved thermodynamic model for supersonic real-gas ejectors using the compound-choking theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    17. Liu, Yang & Cao, Xuewen & Guo, Dan & Cao, Hengguang & Bian, Jiang, 2023. "Influence of shock wave/boundary layer interaction on condensation flow and energy recovery in supersonic nozzle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    18. Ning, Jingjie & Zhou, Yonghua & Long, Fengchu & Tao, Xin, 2018. "A synergistic energy-efficient planning approach for urban rail transit operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 854-863.
    19. Zhou, Yifan & Chen, Guangming & Hao, Xinyue & Gao, Neng & Volovyk, Oleksii, 2023. "Working mechanism and characteristics analysis of a novel configuration of a supersonic ejector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    20. Jungyoul Lim & Chang-Young Lee & Jin-Ho Lee & Wonhee You & Kwan-Sup Lee & Suyong Choi, 2020. "Design Model of Null-Flux Coil Electrodynamic Suspension for the Hyperloop," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221016753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.