IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v185y2019icp1210-1224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on guaranteed output constraints in the long term joint optimal scheduling for the hydropower station group

Author

Listed:
  • He, Zhongzheng
  • Zhou, Jianzhong
  • Xie, Mengfei
  • Jia, Benjun
  • Bao, Zhengfeng
  • Qin, Hui
  • Zhang, Hairong

Abstract

Long-term joint scheduling of hydropower station group (LJSHSG) is a constrained optimization problem, which suffers from a variety of complex and time-state coupling constraints. It is beset with difficulties to solve LJSHSG problem owing to these equality constraints, rigid constraints and flexible constraints of hydropower station group (HSG). The new hybrid constraint handling method combining ε-constraint (EC) and penalty functions (PF) (named EC-PF) is proposed to deal with these constraints in this paper. In the proposed EC-PF, all equality constraints are forced to satisfy according to the equation; EC handle all rigid constraints with minimizing the value of constraint violation and constraint relaxation rule; and the unique flexible constraint, guaranteed output constraint, is processed by PF. Then the proposed EC-PF is compared with the superiority of feasible solutions (SF), stochastic ranking (SR), PF, EC and lexicographic method (LM) in the application to LJSHSG problems; the experimental results verify the superiority of the proposed method. Moreover, the conclusions that it is necessary to deal with rigid constraints from flexible constraints differently in LJSHSG problem are obtained. On this basis, in view of the defect that guaranteed output constraints are difficult to satisfy in LJSHSG, the LJSHSG with the cooperative mode to handle guaranteed output constraints (named LJSHSG-cm) is puts forward. The comparative experimental results of LJSHSG and LJSHSG-cm show that LJSHSG-cm can increase the power generation by 0.3% while increasing the satisfaction rate of guaranteed output constraints by 78.56% compared with LJSHSG for long sequence calculation from 1959 to 2014. These are fully illustrated that the hybrid constraint handling method EC-PF and LJSHSG-cm with the cooperative mode to handle guaranteed output constraints are valid and reliable practical tools in solving LJSHSG.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Zhongzheng & Zhou, Jianzhong & Xie, Mengfei & Jia, Benjun & Bao, Zhengfeng & Qin, Hui & Zhang, Hairong, 2019. "Study on guaranteed output constraints in the long term joint optimal scheduling for the hydropower station group," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1210-1224.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:185:y:2019:i:c:p:1210-1224
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219314057
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu Yuan & Jianzhong Zhou, 2017. "Self-Optimization System Dynamics Simulation of Real-Time Short Term Cascade Hydropower System Considering Uncertainties," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(7), pages 2127-2140, May.
    2. Junhong Zhang & Lu Chen & Vijay Singh & Hongwen Cao & Dangwei Wang, 2015. "Determination of the distribution of flood forecasting error," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 1389-1402, January.
    3. Feng, Zhong-kai & Niu, Wen-jing & Cheng, Chun-tian, 2018. "Optimization of hydropower reservoirs operation balancing generation benefit and ecological requirement with parallel multi-objective genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 706-718.
    4. Jianzhong Zhou & Mengfei Xie & Zhongzhen He & Hui Qin & Liu Yuan, 2017. "Medium-Term Hydro Generation Scheduling (MTHGS) with Chance Constrained Model (CCM) and Dynamic Control Model (DCM)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3543-3555, September.
    5. Junhong Zhang & Lu Chen & Vijay Singh & Wenhong Cao & Dangwei Wang, 2015. "Erratum to: Determination of the distribution of flood forecasting error," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 2065-2065, January.
    6. Chang, XiaoLin & Liu, Xinghong & Zhou, Wei, 2010. "Hydropower in China at present and its further development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 4400-4406.
    7. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 427-432, June.
    8. Liu Yuan & Jianzhong Zhou & Chunlong Li & Mengfei Xie & Li Mo, 2016. "Benefit and Risk Balance Optimization for Stochastic Hydropower Scheduling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3347-3361, August.
    9. Feng, Zhong-kai & Niu, Wen-jing & Cheng, Chun-tian & Liao, Sheng-li, 2017. "Hydropower system operation optimization by discrete differential dynamic programming based on orthogonal experiment design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 720-732.
    10. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 629-637, August.
    11. Jiang, Zhiqiang & Li, Anqiang & Ji, Changming & Qin, Hui & Yu, Shan & Li, Yuanzheng, 2016. "Research and application of key technologies in drawing energy storage operation chart by discriminant coefficient method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 774-786.
    12. Yongqi Liu & Hui Qin & Li Mo & Yongqiang Wang & Duan Chen & Shusen Pang & Xingli Yin, 2019. "Hierarchical Flood Operation Rules Optimization Using Multi-Objective Cultured Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(1), pages 337-354, January.
    13. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(5), pages 777-788, October.
    14. Feng, Zhong-kai & Niu, Wen-jing & Cheng, Chun-tian, 2019. "China’s large-scale hydropower system: operation characteristics, modeling challenge and dimensionality reduction possibilities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 805-818.
    15. Zhong-Kai Feng & Wen-Jing Niu & Jian-Zhong Zhou & Chun-Tian Cheng & Hui Qin & Zhi-Qiang Jiang, 2017. "Parallel Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Short-Term Economic Environmental Hydrothermal Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    16. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 151-160, February.
    17. Tang, Wenzhe & Li, Zhuoyu & Qiang, Maoshan & Wang, Shuli & Lu, Youmei, 2013. "Risk management of hydropower development in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 316-324.
    18. Jiang, Zhiqiang & Ji, Changming & Qin, Hui & Feng, Zhongkai, 2018. "Multi-stage progressive optimality algorithm and its application in energy storage operation chart optimization of cascade reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 309-323.
    19. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    20. Dubois, Didier & Fortemps, Philippe, 1999. "Computing improved optimal solutions to max-min flexible constraint satisfaction problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 95-126, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Zhongzheng & Wang, Chao & Wang, Yongqiang & Wei, Bowen & Zhou, Jianzhong & Zhang, Hairong & Qin, Hui, 2021. "Dynamic programming with successive approximation and relaxation strategy for long-term joint power generation scheduling of large-scale hydropower station group," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    2. Dias, Luis C. & Lamboray, Claude, 2010. "Extensions of the prudence principle to exploit a valued outranking relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 828-837, March.
    3. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 794-801.
    4. Guillaume, Romain & Houé, Raymond & Grabot, Bernard, 2014. "Robust competence assessment for job assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 630-644.
    5. Dubois, D. & Fortemps, Ph., 2005. "Selecting preferred solutions in the minimax approach to dynamic programming problems under flexible constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 582-598, February.
    6. Anglani, Alfredo & Grieco, Antonio & Guerriero, Emanuela & Musmanno, Roberto, 2005. "Robust scheduling of parallel machines with sequence-dependent set-up costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(3), pages 704-720, March.
    7. Kalaı¨, Rim & Lamboray, Claude & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2012. "Lexicographic α-robustness: An alternative to min–max criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 722-728.
    8. Dubois, Didier & Fortemps, Philippe & Pirlot, Marc & Prade, Henri, 2001. "Leximin optimality and fuzzy set-theoretic operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 20-28, April.
    9. He, Zhongzheng & Wang, Chao & Wang, Yongqiang & Wei, Bowen & Zhou, Jianzhong & Zhang, Hairong & Qin, Hui, 2021. "Dynamic programming with successive approximation and relaxation strategy for long-term joint power generation scheduling of large-scale hydropower station group," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Arindam Garai & Palash Mandal & Tapan Kumar Roy, 2016. "Intuitionistic fuzzy T-sets based optimization technique for production-distribution planning in supply chain management," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 950-975, December.
    11. Krzysztof S. Targiel & Maciej Nowak & Tadeusz Trzaskalik, 2018. "Scheduling non-critical activities using multicriteria approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 585-598, September.
    12. Okitonyumbe Y.F., Joseph & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2013. "Nouvelle caractérisation des solutions efficaces des problèmes d’optimisation combinatoire multi-objectif [New characterization of efficient solution in multi-objective combinatorial optimization]," MPRA Paper 66123, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Monica Motta & Caterina Sartori, 2020. "Normality and Nondegeneracy of the Maximum Principle in Optimal Impulsive Control Under State Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 44-71, April.
    14. Chenchen Wu & Dachuan Xu & Donglei Du & Wenqing Xu, 2016. "An approximation algorithm for the balanced Max-3-Uncut problem using complex semidefinite programming rounding," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1017-1035, November.
    15. Uzma Ashraf & Hassan Ali & Muhammad Nawaz Chaudry & Irfan Ashraf & Adila Batool & Zafeer Saqib, 2016. "Predicting the Potential Distribution of Olea ferruginea in Pakistan incorporating Climate Change by Using Maxent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, July.
    16. World Bank, 2003. "Argentina : Reforming Policies and Institutions for Efficiency and Equity of Public Expenditures," World Bank Publications - Reports 14637, The World Bank Group.
    17. Brown, Jeffrey R., 2001. "Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitize," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 29-62, October.
    18. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    19. Wong, Patricia J.Y., 2015. "Eigenvalues of a general class of boundary value problem with derivative-dependent nonlinearity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 908-930.
    20. Norma M Rantisi & Deborah Leslie, 2021. "In and against the neoliberal state? The precarious siting of work integration social enterprises (WISEs) as counter-movement in Montreal, Quebec," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 349-370, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:185:y:2019:i:c:p:1210-1224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.