IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v73y2018icp371-379.html

Changing baselines, shifting margins: How predicted impacts of pricing carbon in the electricity sector have evolved over time

Author

Listed:
  • Palmer, Karen
  • Paul, Anthony
  • Keyes, Amelia

Abstract

CO2 emissions reductions from within the U.S. electricity sector can come primarily from four sources: reductions in the emissions intensity of the operating coal and natural gas fleets, shifting generation from coal to natural gas, shifting generation from fossil fuels to renewables, and reduced total generation in response to lower electricity demand. The relative importance of each of these margins depends on technology costs, fuel costs, and electricity demand growth. In this paper we explore how recent changes in actual and predicted technology costs for renewables, natural gas prices, and the rate of electricity demand growth have affected emissions from the electricity sector. We use a model to analyze how the sector would respond to a carbon tax with emphasis on the contributions of the four margins and compare with older analysis performed when technology and fuel cost projections were different. We find that a carbon tax induces a more prominent shift of generation from both coal and gas to renewables than from coal to both gas and renewables under the more recent technology and cost projections. We also show that contrary to findings from earlier analysis with higher assumed renewables costs, high natural gas prices enhance the effectiveness of CO2 taxes through greater substitution from gas to renewables. Carbon taxes are having a smaller impact on retail electricity prices in both absolute and percentage terms and thus on overall demand with the more recent projections.

Suggested Citation

  • Palmer, Karen & Paul, Anthony & Keyes, Amelia, 2018. "Changing baselines, shifting margins: How predicted impacts of pricing carbon in the electricity sector have evolved over time," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 371-379.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:371-379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098831830104X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dahlke, Steven, 2019. "Short run effects of carbon policy on U.S. electricity markets," SocArXiv b79yu, Center for Open Science.
    2. Picciano, Paul & Aguilar, Francisco X. & Burtraw, Dallas & Mirzaee, Ashkan, 2022. "Environmental and socio-economic implications of woody biomass co-firing at coal-fired power plants," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Liu, Bingquan & Shi, Junxue & Wang, Hui & Su, Xuelin & Zhou, Peng, 2019. "Driving factors of carbon emissions in China: A joint decomposition approach based on meta-frontier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Shawhan, Daniel & Cleary, Kathryne & Funke, Christoph & Witkin, Steven, 2021. "The Value of Advanced Energy Funding: Projected Effects of Proposed US Funding for Advanced Energy Technologies," RFF Working Paper Series 21-10, Resources for the Future.
    6. Alexander R. Barron & Allen A. Fawcett & Marc A. C. Hafstead & James R. Mcfarland & Adele C. Morris, 2018. "Policy Insights From The Emf 32 Study On U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 1-47, February.
    7. Yumeng Mao & Xuemei Li, 2023. "A Review of Research on the Impact Mechanisms of Green Development in the Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Ang, B.W. & Goh, Tian, 2019. "Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 74-87.
    9. Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2020. "Value of technology in the U.S. electric power sector: Impacts of full portfolios and technological change on the costs of meeting decarbonization goals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. repec:osf:socarx:b79yu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Woerman, Matt, 2023. "Linking carbon markets with different initial conditions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. John Bistlinea & Chikara Onda & Morgan Browning & Johannes Emmerling & Gokul Iyer & Megan Mahajan & Jim McFarland & Haewon McJeon & Robbie Orvis & Francisco Ralston Fonseca & Christopher Roney & Noah , 2024. "Equity Implications of Net-Zero Emissions: A Multi-Model Analysis of Energy Expenditures Across Income Classes Under Economy-Wide Deep Decarbonization Policies," Papers 2405.18748, arXiv.org.
    13. Steve Dahlke, 2019. "Short Run Effects of Carbon Policy on U.S. Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Keyes, Amelia & Lambert, Kathleen & Burtraw, Dallas & Buonocore, Jonathan & Levy, Jonathan & Driscoll, Charles, 2018. "Carbon Standards Examined: A Comparison of At-the-Source and Beyond-the-Source Power Plant Carbon Standards," RFF Working Paper Series 18-20, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:371-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.