IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v297y2022i1p291-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instance-dependent cost-sensitive learning for detecting transfer fraud

Author

Listed:
  • Höppner, Sebastiaan
  • Baesens, Bart
  • Verbeke, Wouter
  • Verdonck, Tim

Abstract

Card transaction fraud is a growing problem affecting card holders worldwide. Financial institutions increasingly rely upon data-driven methods for developing fraud detection systems, which are able to automatically detect and block fraudulent transactions. From a machine learning perspective, the task of detecting fraudulent transactions is a binary classification problem. Classification models are commonly trained and evaluated in terms of statistical performance measures, such as likelihood and AUC, respectively. These measures, however, do not take into account the actual business objective, which is to minimize the financial losses due to fraud. Fraud detection is to be acknowledged as an instance-dependent cost-sensitive classification problem, where the costs due to misclassification vary between instances, and requiring adapted approaches for learning a classification model. In this article, an instance-dependent threshold is derived, based on the instance-dependent cost matrix for transfer fraud detection, that allows for making the optimal cost-based decision for each transaction. Two novel classifiers are presented, based on lasso-regularized logistic regression and gradient tree boosting, which directly minimize the proposed instance-dependent cost measure when learning a classification model. The proposed methods are implemented in the R packages cslogit and csboost, and compared against state-of-the-art methods on a publicly available data set from the machine learning competition website Kaggle and a proprietary card transaction data set. The results of the experiments highlight the potential of reducing fraud losses by adopting the proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Höppner, Sebastiaan & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter & Verdonck, Tim, 2022. "Instance-dependent cost-sensitive learning for detecting transfer fraud," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 291-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:297:y:2022:i:1:p:291-300
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721004562
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verbraken, Thomas & Bravo, Cristián & Weber, Richard & Baesens, Bart, 2014. "Development and application of consumer credit scoring models using profit-based classification measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 505-513.
    2. Georges Dionne & Florence Giuliano & Pierre Picard, 2009. "Optimal Auditing with Scoring: Theory and Application to Insurance Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 58-70, January.
    3. G. Dionne & F. Giuliano & P. Picard, 2002. "Optimal auditing for insurance fraud," THEMA Working Papers 2002-32, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    4. Bart Baesens & Rudy Setiono & Christophe Mues & Jan Vanthienen, 2003. "Using Neural Network Rule Extraction and Decision Tables for Credit-Risk Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 312-329, March.
    5. Jay Nanduri & Yuting Jia & Anand Oka & John Beaver & Yung-Wen Liu, 2020. "Microsoft Uses Machine Learning and Optimization to Reduce E-Commerce Fraud," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 64-79, January.
    6. D J Hand & C Whitrow & N M Adams & P Juszczak & D Weston, 2008. "Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(7), pages 956-962, July.
    7. Verbeke, Wouter & Dejaeger, Karel & Martens, David & Hur, Joon & Baesens, Bart, 2012. "New insights into churn prediction in the telecommunication sector: A profit driven data mining approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 211-229.
    8. Véronique Van Vlasselaer & Tina Eliassi-Rad & Leman Akoglu & Monique Snoeck & Bart Baesens, 2017. "GOTCHA! Network-Based Fraud Detection for Social Security Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 3090-3110, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koen W. de Bock & Kristof Coussement & Arno De Caigny & Roman Slowiński & Bart Baesens & Robert N Boute & Tsan-Ming Choi & Dursun Delen & Mathias Kraus & Stefan Lessmann & Sebastián Maldonado & David , 2023. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A Defining Framework, Methods, Applications, and a Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04219546, HAL.
    2. Verbeke, Wouter & Olaya, Diego & Guerry, Marie-Anne & Van Belle, Jente, 2023. "To do or not to do? Cost-sensitive causal classification with individual treatment effect estimates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 838-852.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen W. de Bock & Kristof Coussement & Arno De Caigny & Roman Slowiński & Bart Baesens & Robert N Boute & Tsan-Ming Choi & Dursun Delen & Mathias Kraus & Stefan Lessmann & Sebastián Maldonado & David , 2023. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A Defining Framework, Methods, Applications, and a Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04219546, HAL.
    2. Lina Bouayad & Balaji Padmanabhan & Kaushal Chari, 2019. "Audit Policies Under the Sentinel Effect: Deterrence-Driven Algorithms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 466-485, June.
    3. Farbmacher, Helmut & Löw, Leander & Spindler, Martin, 2022. "An explainable attention network for fraud detection in claims management," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 244-258.
    4. K. Coussement & K. W. Bock & S. Geuens, 2022. "A decision-analytic framework for interpretable recommendation systems with multiple input data sources: a case study for a European e-tailer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 671-694, August.
    5. Véronique Van Vlasselaer & Tina Eliassi-Rad & Leman Akoglu & Monique Snoeck & Bart Baesens, 2017. "GOTCHA! Network-Based Fraud Detection for Social Security Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 3090-3110, September.
    6. Galeotti, Marcello & Rabitti, Giovanni & Vannucci, Emanuele, 2020. "An evolutionary approach to fraud management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1167-1177.
    7. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Pierre Picard, 2014. "Fraudulent Claims and Nitpicky Insurers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(9), pages 2900-2917, September.
    8. John Bone & Dominic Spengler, 2014. "Does Reporting Decrease Corruption?," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 26(1-2), pages 161-186, January.
    9. Dionne, Georges & Wang, Kili, 2011. "Does opportunistic fraud in automobile theft insurance fluctuate with the business cycle?," Working Papers 11-4, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    10. Appelgren, Leif, 2020. "A survey of models for determining optimal audit strategies," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    11. John E. Murray, 2011. "Asymmetric Information and Countermeasures in Early Twentieth‐Century American Short‐Term Disability Microinsurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(1), pages 117-138, March.
    12. Nicola Gennaioli & Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2022. "Trust and Insurance Contracts," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(12), pages 5287-5333.
    13. Abe Dunn & Joshua D. Gottlieb & Adam Shapiro & Daniel J. Sonnenstuhl & Pietro Tebaldi, 2021. "A Denial a Day Keeps the Doctor Away," NBER Working Papers 29010, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Pierre Picard, 2012. "Economic Analysis of Insurance Fraud," Working Papers hal-00725561, HAL.
    15. Lessmann, Stefan & Baesens, Bart & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Thomas, Lyn C., 2015. "Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 124-136.
    16. Dejaeger, Karel & Goethals, Frank & Giangreco, Antonio & Mola, Lapo & Baesens, Bart, 2012. "Gaining insight into student satisfaction using comprehensible data mining techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 548-562.
    17. Katja Müller & Hato Schmeiser & Joël Wagner, 2016. "The impact of auditing strategies on insurers’ profitability," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 17(1), pages 46-79, January.
    18. Georges Dionne & Kili Wang, 2013. "Does insurance fraud in automobile theft insurance fluctuate with the business cycle?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 67-92, August.
    19. Dominic Spengler, 2012. "Endogenising Detection in an Asymmetric Penalties Corruption Game," Discussion Papers 12/20, Department of Economics, University of York.
    20. Lohse, Tim & Konrad, Kai A. & Qari, Salmai, 2014. "Deception Choice and Audit Design - The Importance of Being Earnest," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100577, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:297:y:2022:i:1:p:291-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.