IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v290y2021i2p622-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An online algorithm for the risk-aware restless bandit

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Jianyu
  • Chen, Lujie
  • Tang, Ou

Abstract

The multi-armed bandit (MAB) is a classical model for the exploration vs. exploitation trade-off. Among existing MAB models, the restless bandit model is of increasing interest because of its dynamic nature, which makes it highly applicable in practice. Like other MAB models, the traditional (risk-neutral) restless bandit model searches for the arm with the lowest mean cost and does not consider risk-aversion, which is critical in cases such as clinical trials and financial investment. This limitation thus hinders the application of the traditional restless bandit. Motivated by these concerns, we introduce a general risk measure that satisfies a mild restriction to formulate a risk-aware restless model; in particular, we set a risk measure as the criterion for the performance of each arm, instead of the expectation as in the traditional case. Compared with classical MAB models, we conclude that our model settings accommodate risk-aware researchers and decision makers. We present an index-based online algorithm for the problem, and derive an upper bound on the regret of this algorithm. Then, we conclude that our algorithm retains an instance-based regret of order O(log T/T), which is consistent with the classical MAB model. Further, some specific risk measures, namely, mean-deviation, shortfall and the discrete Kusuoka risk measure, are used to demonstrate the details of our framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Jianyu & Chen, Lujie & Tang, Ou, 2021. "An online algorithm for the risk-aware restless bandit," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 622-639.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:290:y:2021:i:2:p:622-639
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720307414
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven L. Scott, 2015. "Multi‐armed bandit experiments in the online service economy," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 37-45, January.
    2. Andrzej Ruszczyński & Alexander Shapiro, 2006. "Optimization of Convex Risk Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 433-452, August.
    3. Dinesh Kumar, U. & Saranga, Haritha, 2010. "Optimal selection of obsolescence mitigation strategies using a restless bandit model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 170-180, January.
    4. Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E.B. Lim, 2016. "Robust Multiarmed Bandit Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 264-285, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Niño-Mora, 2023. "Markovian Restless Bandits and Index Policies: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Agrawal, Priyank & Tulabandhula, Theja & Avadhanula, Vashist, 2023. "A tractable online learning algorithm for the multinomial logit contextual bandit," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 737-750.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malekipirbazari, Milad & Çavuş, Özlem, 2024. "Index policy for multiarmed bandit problem with dynamic risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 627-640.
    2. Ahumada, Omar & Rene Villalobos, J. & Nicholas Mason, A., 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-26.
    3. Volker Krätschmer, 2007. "On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2007-010, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    4. Pichler, Alois & Shapiro, Alexander, 2015. "Minimal representation of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 184-193.
    5. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    6. Miller, Naomi & Ruszczynski, Andrzej, 2008. "Risk-adjusted probability measures in portfolio optimization with coherent measures of risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 193-206, November.
    7. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim, 2009. "Goal-Driven Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 342-357, April.
    8. Keita Owari, 2013. "On the Lebesgue Property of Monotone Convex Functions," Papers 1305.2271, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2013.
    9. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2023. "Bowley vs. Pareto optima in reinsurance contracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 382-391.
    10. Ludger Overbeck & Florian Schindler, 2021. "Scalar systemic risk measures and Aumann-Shapley allocations," Papers 2112.06534, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    11. Shengzhong Chen & Niushan Gao & Denny Leung & Lei Li, 2021. "Automatic Fatou Property of Law-invariant Risk Measures," Papers 2107.08109, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    12. Daniel Lacker, 2018. "Liquidity, Risk Measures, and Concentration of Measure," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 813-837, August.
    13. Eisenberg, Julia & Krühner, Paul, 2018. "The impact of negative interest rates on optimal capital injections," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Alois Pichler & Alexander Shapiro, 2012. "Uniqueness of Kusuoka Representations," Papers 1210.7257, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2013.
    15. Drew P. Kouri & Thomas M. Surowiec, 2020. "Epi-Regularization of Risk Measures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 774-795, May.
    16. Dentcheva, Darinka & Penev, Spiridon, 2010. "Shape-restricted inference for Lorenz curves using duality theory," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(5-6), pages 403-412, March.
    17. Liebrich, Felix-Benedikt & Svindland, Gregor, 2017. "Model spaces for risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 150-165.
    18. Yang, Jian & Li, Jianbin, 2020. "Cooperative game with nondeterministic returns," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 123-140.
    19. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Seddighi, Amir Hossein, 2013. "A location-routing problem with disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 63-82.
    20. R. Tyrrell Rockafellar & Johannes O. Royset, 2018. "Superquantile/CVaR risk measures: second-order theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 3-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:290:y:2021:i:2:p:622-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.