IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v252y2016i2p466-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid scenario cluster decomposition algorithm for supply chain tactical planning under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh
  • Sanei Bajgiran, Omid
  • Nourelfath, Mustapha

Abstract

We propose a Hybrid Scenario Cluster Decomposition (HSCD) heuristic for solving a large-scale multi-stage stochastic mixed-integer programming (MS-MIP) model corresponding to a supply chain tactical planning problem. The HSCD algorithm decomposes the original scenario tree into smaller sub-trees that share a certain number of predecessor nodes. Then, the MS-MIP model is decomposed into smaller scenario-cluster multi-stage stochastic sub-models coordinated by Lagrangian terms in their objective functions, in order to compensate the lack of non-anticipativity corresponding to common ancestor nodes of sub-trees. The sub-gradient algorithm is then implemented in order to guide the scenario-cluster sub-models into an implementable solution. Moreover, a Variable Fixing Heuristic is embedded into the sub-gradient algorithm in order to accelerate its convergence rate. Along with the possibility of parallelization, the HSCD algorithm provides the possibility of embedding various heuristics for solving scenario-cluster sub-models. The algorithm is specialized to lumber supply chain tactical planning under demand and supply uncertainty. An ad-hoc heuristic, based on Lagrangian Relaxation, is proposed to solve each scenario-cluster sub-model. Our experimental results on a set of realistic-scale test cases reveal the efficiency of HSCD in terms of solution quality and computation time.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Sanei Bajgiran, Omid & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2016. "A hybrid scenario cluster decomposition algorithm for supply chain tactical planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 466-476.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:252:y:2016:i:2:p:466-476
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171600093X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. T. Rockafellar & Roger J.-B. Wets, 1991. "Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization Under Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 119-147, February.
    2. Sanei Bajgiran, Omid & Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2016. "The value of integrated tactical planning optimization in the lumber supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 22-33.
    3. Haugen, Kjetil K. & Lokketangen, Arne & Woodruff, David L., 2001. "Progressive hedging as a meta-heuristic applied to stochastic lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 116-122, July.
    4. Jean-Paul Watson & David Woodruff, 2011. "Progressive hedging innovations for a class of stochastic mixed-integer resource allocation problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 355-370, November.
    5. Guglielmo Lulli & Suvrajeet Sen, 2004. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Multistage Stochastic Integer Programming with Application to Stochastic Batch-Sizing Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 786-796, June.
    6. M Kazemi Zanjani & M Nourelfath & D Ait-Kadi, 2013. "A scenario decomposition approach for stochastic production planning in sawmills," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(1), pages 48-59, January.
    7. Alonso-Ayuso, Antonio & Escudero, Laureano F. & Teresa Ortuno, M., 2003. "BFC, A branch-and-fix coordination algorithmic framework for solving some types of stochastic pure and mixed 0-1 programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 503-519, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dillon, Mary & Vauhkonen, Ilmari & Arvas, Mikko & Ihalainen, Jarkko & Vilkkumaa, Eeva & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2023. "Supporting platelet inventory management decisions: What is the effect of extending platelets’ shelf life?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 640-654.
    2. Omid Sanei Bajgiran & Masoumeh Kazemi Zanjani & Mustapha Nourelfath, 2017. "Forest harvesting planning under uncertainty: a cardinality-constrained approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1914-1929, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    2. Serhat Gul & Brian T. Denton & John W. Fowler, 2015. "A Progressive Hedging Approach for Surgery Planning Under Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 755-772, November.
    3. Poudel, Sushil Raj & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan, 2016. "A hybrid decomposition algorithm for designing a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-25.
    4. Lanza, Giacomo & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Rei, Walter & Ricciardi, Nicoletta, 2021. "Scheduled service network design with quality targets and stochastic travel times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 30-46.
    5. Lulli, Guglielmo & Sen, Suvrajeet, 2006. "A heuristic procedure for stochastic integer programs with complete recourse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 879-890, June.
    6. Schulze, Tim & Grothey, Andreas & McKinnon, Ken, 2017. "A stabilised scenario decomposition algorithm applied to stochastic unit commitment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 247-259.
    7. Huang, Zhouchun & Zheng, Qipeng Phil, 2020. "A multistage stochastic programming approach for preventive maintenance scheduling of GENCOs with natural gas contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1036-1051.
    8. Sheng, Xiaoming & Chew, Ek Peng & Lee, Loo Hay, 2015. "(s,S) policy model for liner shipping refueling and sailing speed optimization problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 76-92.
    9. Wu, Dexiang & Wu, Desheng Dash, 2020. "A decision support approach for two-stage multi-objective index tracking using improved lagrangian decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Hu, Shaolong & Han, Chuanfeng & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Meng, Lingpeng, 2019. "A multi-stage stochastic programming model for relief distribution considering the state of road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 64-87.
    11. Zhicheng Zhu & Yisha Xiang & Bo Zeng, 2021. "Multicomponent Maintenance Optimization: A Stochastic Programming Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 898-914, July.
    12. Yongxi (Eric) Huang & Yueyue Fan & Chien-Wei Chen, 2014. "An Integrated Biofuel Supply Chain to Cope with Feedstock Seasonality and Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 540-554, November.
    13. Gruson, Matthieu & Cordeau, Jean-François & Jans, Raf, 2021. "Benders decomposition for a stochastic three-level lot sizing and replenishment problem with a distribution structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 206-217.
    14. Alvarez, Aldair & Cordeau, Jean-François & Jans, Raf & Munari, Pedro & Morabito, Reinaldo, 2021. "Inventory routing under stochastic supply and demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Fan, Yueyue & Huang, Yongxi & Chen, Chien-Wei, 2012. "Multistage Infrastructure System Design: An Integrated Biofuel Supply Chain against Feedstock Seasonality and Uncertainty," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9g8413m5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Alonso-Ayuso, Antonio & Escudero, Laureano F. & Guignard, Monique & Weintraub, Andres, 2018. "Risk management for forestry planning under uncertainty in demand and prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1051-1074.
    17. Eguía Ribero, María Isabel & Garín Martín, María Araceli & Unzueta Inchaurbe, Aitziber, 2018. "Generating cluster submodels from two-stage stochastic mixed integer optimization models," BILTOKI 31248, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística).
    18. Can Li & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2019. "A finite $$\epsilon $$ϵ-convergence algorithm for two-stage stochastic convex nonlinear programs with mixed-binary first and second-stage variables," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 921-947, December.
    19. Giovanni Pantuso & Trine K. Boomsma, 2020. "On the number of stages in multistage stochastic programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 581-603, September.
    20. Fadda, Edoardo & Perboli, Guido & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "A progressive hedging method for the optimization of social engagement and opportunistic IoT problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 643-652.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:252:y:2016:i:2:p:466-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.