IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v201y2010i1p231-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic errors and repetitive sequential classifications in on-line process control by attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Costa Quinino, Roberto da
  • Colin, Emerson C.
  • Ho, Linda Lee

Abstract

The procedure of on-line process control by attributes, known as Taguchi's on-line process control, consists of inspecting the mth item (a single item) at every m produced items and deciding, at each inspection, whether the fraction of conforming items was reduced or not. If the inspected item is non-conforming, the production is stopped for adjustment. As the inspection system can be subject to diagnosis errors, one develops a probabilistic model that classifies repeatedly the examined item until a conforming or b non-conforming classification is observed. The first event that occurs (a conforming classifications or b non-conforming classifications) determines the final classification of the examined item. Proprieties of an ergodic Markov chain were used to get the expression of average cost of the system of control, which can be optimized by three parameters: the sampling interval of the inspections (m); the number of repeated conforming classifications (a); and the number of repeated non-conforming classifications (b). The optimum design is compared with two alternative approaches: the first one consists of a simple preventive policy. The production system is adjusted at every n produced items (no inspection is performed). The second classifies the examined item repeatedly r (fixed) times and considers it conforming if most classification results are conforming. Results indicate that the current proposal performs better than the procedure that fixes the number of repeated classifications and classifies the examined item as conforming if most classifications were conforming. On the other hand, the preventive policy can be averagely the most economical alternative rather than those ones that require inspection depending on the degree of errors and costs. A numerical example illustrates the proposed procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa Quinino, Roberto da & Colin, Emerson C. & Ho, Linda Lee, 2010. "Diagnostic errors and repetitive sequential classifications in on-line process control by attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 231-238, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:1:p:231-238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00079-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gong, Linguo & Tang, Kwei, 1997. "Monitoring machine operations using on-line sensors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 479-492, February.
    2. Ding, Jie & Gong, Linguo, 2008. "The effect of testing equipment shift on optimal decisions in a repetitive testing process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 330-350, April.
    3. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    4. Jie Ding & Betsy S. Greenberg & Hirofumi Matsuo, 1998. "Repetitive Testing Strategies When the Testing Process Is Imperfect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1367-1378, October.
    5. Quinino, R. C. & Lee Ho, L., 2004. "Repetitive tests as an economic alternative procedure to control attributes with diagnosis errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 209-225, May.
    6. Bendavid, Illana & Herer, Yale T., 2009. "Economic optimization of off-line inspection in a process that also produces non-conforming units when in control and conforming units when out of control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 139-155, May.
    7. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2007. "Economic off-line quality control strategy with two types of inspection errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 132-147, May.
    8. Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2003. "An economic inspection interval for control of defective items in a hot rolling mill," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 273-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bersimis, Sotiris & Koutras, Markos V. & Maravelakis, Petros E., 2014. "A compound control chart for monitoring and controlling high quality processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 595-603.
    2. Ho, Linda Lee & Quinino, Roberto C., 2012. "Integrating on-line process control and imperfect corrective maintenance: An economical design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 253-262.
    3. L Bessegato & R Quinino & L L Ho & L Duczmal, 2011. "Variable interval sampling in economical designs for online process control of attributes with misclassification errors," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1365-1375, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L Bessegato & R Quinino & L L Ho & L Duczmal, 2011. "Variable interval sampling in economical designs for online process control of attributes with misclassification errors," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1365-1375, July.
    2. Chun, Young H., 2016. "Designing repetitive screening procedures with imperfect inspections: An empirical Bayes approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 639-647.
    3. Hassin, Refael & Sarid, Anna, 2018. "Operations research applications of dichotomous search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 795-812.
    4. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    5. Ho, Linda Lee & Quinino, Roberto C., 2012. "Integrating on-line process control and imperfect corrective maintenance: An economical design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 253-262.
    6. Gong, Linguo, 2012. "The effect of testing errors on a repetitive testing process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 115-124.
    7. Muhammad Babar Ramzan & Shehreyar Mohsin Qureshi & Sonia Irshad Mari & Muhammad Saad Memon & Mandeep Mittal & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Waqas Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of Time-Varying Factors on Optimal Combination of Quality Inspectors for Offline Inspection Station," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    10. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    11. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Scarf, P.A., 2013. "Modelling imperfect inspection over a finite horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-29.
    12. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    13. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    14. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. Andrei Sleptchenko & M. Eric Johnson, 2015. "Maintaining Secure and Reliable Distributed Control Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 103-117, February.
    16. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    17. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    18. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    19. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    20. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:1:p:231-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.