IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v196y2009i1p266-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A problem-solving approach to product design using decision tree induction based on intuitionistic fuzzy

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Rui-Yang

Abstract

Customer complaint problem is a product design used to understand customer requirements. Furthermore, product design corresponding to customer requirement does not feel adequately solved for a cause of problem. The cause of the problem affecting product design is solved to prevent customer complaint from reoccurring. However, the problems by customer may have observation uncertainty and fuzzy. Fuzzy concept considers not only the degree of membership to an accept set, but also the degree of non-membership to a rejection set. Therefore, we present a new approach for problem solving using decision tree induction based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets in this paper. Under this approach, we first develop the problem formulation for the symptoms and causes of the problem based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Next, we identify the cause of the problem using intuitionistic fuzzy decision tree by the problem formulation. We then provide the approach to find the optimal cause of the problem for the consideration of product design. A numerical example is used to illustrate the approach applied for product design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Rui-Yang, 2009. "A problem-solving approach to product design using decision tree induction based on intuitionistic fuzzy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 266-272, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:196:y:2009:i:1:p:266-272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00284-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kwang-Jae & Moskowitz, Herbert & Dhingra, Anoop & Evans, Gerald, 2000. "Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 504-518, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hassan Hashemi & Seyed Meysam Mousavi & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Alireza Chalekaee & Zenonas Turskis, 2018. "A New Group Decision Model Based on Grey-Intuitionistic Fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for Contractor Assessment Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Hassan Hashemi & Jalal Bazargan & S. Mousavi, 2013. "A Compromise Ratio Method with an Application to Water Resources Management: An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2029-2051, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    2. Iranmanesh, Hossein & Thomson, Vince, 2008. "Competitive advantage by adjusting design characteristics to satisfy cost targets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 64-71, September.
    3. Lin, Ling-Zhong & Yeh, Huery-Ren & Wang, Ming-Chao, 2015. "Integration of Kano’s model into FQFD for Taiwanese Ban-Doh banquet culture," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 245-262.
    4. Carnevalli, Jose A. & Miguel, Paulo Cauchick, 2008. "Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD--Types of research, difficulties and benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 737-754, August.
    5. Chen, Yizeng & Fung, Richard Y.K. & Tang, Jiafu, 2006. "Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1553-1566, November.
    6. Wen-Chin Chen & Hui-Pin Chang & Kuan-Ming Lin & Neng-Hao Kan, 2015. "An Efficient Model for NPD Performance Evaluation Using DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP—Applied to the TFT-LCD Touch Panel Industry in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Kahraman, Cengiz & Ertay, Tijen & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2006. "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 390-411, June.
    8. Erol, Ismail & Ferrell, William Jr., 2003. "A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 187-199, December.
    9. Chin-Hung Liu & Hsin-Hung Wu, 2008. "A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 527-540, August.
    10. K. Smimou, 2013. "On the significance testing of fuzzy regression applied to the CAPM: Canadian commodity futures evidence," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 144-171.
    11. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2002. "Quality function deployment: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 463-497, December.
    12. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju, 2015. "A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 815-829.
    13. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Weng, Ming-Chu, 2006. "An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 230-248, July.
    14. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Ko, Wen-Chang & Yeh, Feng-Ting, 2017. "Approach based on fuzzy goal programing and quality function deployment for new product planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 654-663.
    15. Jia Huang & Ling-Xiang Mao & Hu-Chen Liu & Min-shun Song, 2022. "Quality function deployment improvement: A bibliometric analysis and literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1347-1366, June.
    16. Majid Behzadian & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh & Joshua Ignatius & Mark Goh & Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri, 2013. "PROMETHEE Group Decision Support System and the House of Quality," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 189-205, March.
    17. Tianxiong Wang & Liu Yang, 2023. "Combining GRA with a Fuzzy QFD Model for the New Product Design and Development of Wickerwork Lamps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Shiva Mehrabi-Kandsar & Abolfazl Mirzazadeh & Aref Gholami-Qadikolaei, 2017. "The quality function deployment method under uncertain environment using evidential reasoning: a case study of compressor manufacturing," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1867-1884, November.
    19. Cherif, Mohamed Sadok & Chabchoub, Habib & Aouni, Belaid, 2008. "Quality control system design through the goal programming model and the satisfaction functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(3), pages 1084-1098, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:196:y:2009:i:1:p:266-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.