IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v11y2019icp145-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oracle inequalities for sign constrained generalized linear models

Author

Listed:
  • Koike, Yuta
  • Tanoue, Yuta

Abstract

High-dimensional data have recently been analyzed because of advancements in data collection technology. Although many methods have been developed for sparse recovery in the past 20 years, most of these methods require the selection of tuning parameters. This requirement means that the results obtained with these methods heavily depend on tuning. Theoretical properties are developed for sign-constrained generalized linear models with convex loss function, which is one of the sparse regression methods that does not require tuning parameters. Recent studies on this subject have shown that, in the case of linear regression, sign-constraints alone could be as efficient as the oracle method if the design matrix enjoys a suitable assumption in addition to a traditional compatibility condition. This type of result is generalized to a model that encompasses logistic and quantile regressions. Some numerical experiments are performed to confirm the theoretical findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Koike, Yuta & Tanoue, Yuta, 2019. "Oracle inequalities for sign constrained generalized linear models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 145-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:11:y:2019:i:c:p:145-157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2019.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306219300085
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2019.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    3. Mehmet Caner & Anders Bredahl Kock, 2016. "Oracle Inequalities for Convex Loss Functions with Nonlinear Targets," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-10), pages 1377-1411, December.
    4. A. Belloni & V. Chernozhukov & L. Wang, 2011. "Square-root lasso: pivotal recovery of sparse signals via conic programming," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(4), pages 791-806.
    5. Ming Yuan & Yi Lin, 2006. "Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(1), pages 49-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanshan Qin & Hao Ding & Yuehua Wu & Feng Liu, 2021. "High-dimensional sign-constrained feature selection and grouping," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(4), pages 787-819, August.
    2. Ghosal, Rahul & Ghosh, Sujit K., 2022. "Bayesian inference for generalized linear model with linear inequality constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zanhua Yin, 2020. "Variable selection for sparse logistic regression," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(7), pages 821-836, October.
    2. Luke Mosley & Idris A. Eckley & Alex Gibberd, 2022. "Sparse temporal disaggregation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2203-2233, October.
    3. Ismail Shah & Hina Naz & Sajid Ali & Amani Almohaimeed & Showkat Ahmad Lone, 2023. "A New Quantile-Based Approach for LASSO Estimation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Luke Mosley & Idris Eckley & Alex Gibberd, 2021. "Sparse Temporal Disaggregation," Papers 2108.05783, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    5. Kaixu Yang & Tapabrata Maiti, 2022. "Ultrahigh‐dimensional generalized additive model: Unified theory and methods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 917-942, September.
    6. Kock, Anders Bredahl & Callot, Laurent, 2015. "Oracle inequalities for high dimensional vector autoregressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 325-344.
    7. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    8. Peng, Heng & Lu, Ying, 2012. "Model selection in linear mixed effect models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 109-129.
    9. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.
    10. G. Aneiros & P. Vieu, 2016. "Sparse nonparametric model for regression with functional covariate," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 839-859, October.
    11. Lam, Clifford, 2008. "Estimation of large precision matrices through block penalization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 31543, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Zhang, Tao & Zhang, Qingzhao & Wang, Qihua, 2014. "Model detection for functional polynomial regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 183-197.
    13. Umberto Amato & Anestis Antoniadis & Italia De Feis & Irene Gijbels, 2021. "Penalised robust estimators for sparse and high-dimensional linear models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(1), pages 1-48, March.
    14. Victor Chernozhukov & Ivan Fernandez-Val & Christian Hansen, 2013. "Program evaluation with high-dimensional data," CeMMAP working papers CWP57/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Toshio Honda, 2021. "The de-biased group Lasso estimation for varying coefficient models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(1), pages 3-29, February.
    16. Capanu, Marinela & Giurcanu, Mihai & Begg, Colin B. & Gönen, Mithat, 2023. "Subsampling based variable selection for generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Joseph G. Ibrahim & Hongtu Zhu & Ramon I. Garcia & Ruixin Guo, 2011. "Fixed and Random Effects Selection in Mixed Effects Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 495-503, June.
    18. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    19. Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen & Yuan Liao, 2015. "A lava attack on the recovery of sums of dense and sparse signals," CeMMAP working papers CWP56/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Fei Jin & Lung-fei Lee, 2018. "Lasso Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Parametric Models with Singular Information Matrices," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:11:y:2019:i:c:p:145-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.