IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v475y2023ics0304380022003155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of different invasion methods of invasive species on omnivorous food webs

Author

Listed:
  • Jiabu, Duojie
  • Li, Weide

Abstract

Biological invasion results in a lot of problems about ecosystem and human life. To explore the mechanism of alien species invading a stable food web, a patch dynamic model is established to describe the patch occupancy of each species in the omnivorous food web. A species as invader will be introduced to the food web on different tropical level as predator or as prey. The impact of invasion on the persistence of all species in formed food webs under different habitat loss and habitat fragmentation is investigated. The results show: (1) Compared with invasive species being predators, invasive species being prey is easy to success in omnivorous food webs; Invasive species are much more tolerant of habitat loss and fragmentation when they invade an omnivorous food web in the role of prey than when they invade in the role of predator. (2) When invasive species is a predator in different trophic levels on omnivorous food webs, it shows different coexistence patterns varying with the role and habitat structure. The degree of habitat loss and habitat fragmentation also affects the habitat patch occupancy of the invasive species. On most habitat structure, the lower the trophic level of the invasion location, the more successful the invasion is. (3) When invasive species is a prey of species in omnivorous food webs, no matter what trophic level the invasive species is, it is easy to success. (4) The degree of habitat loss and fragmentation combined with colonization rate have certain impact on invasion result under different roles and trophic levels. The research gives some theoretical thinking of biological invasion, and it can be used as a guidance of biological control.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiabu, Duojie & Li, Weide, 2023. "Impact of different invasion methods of invasive species on omnivorous food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:475:y:2023:i:c:s0304380022003155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022003155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore A. Kennedy & Shahid Naeem & Katherine M. Howe & Johannes M. H. Knops & David Tilman & Peter Reich, 2002. "Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion," Nature, Nature, vol. 417(6889), pages 636-638, June.
    2. Fernanda S. Valdovinos & Eric L. Berlow & Pablo Moisset de Espanés & Rodrigo Ramos-Jiliberto & Diego P. Vázquez & Neo D. Martinez, 2018. "Species traits and network structure predict the success and impacts of pollinator invasions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Nie, Shipeng & Li, Weide, 2020. "How spatial structure of species and disturbance influence the ecological invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph George Ray & Prasanthkumar Santhakumaran & Santhoshkumar Kookal, 2021. "Phytoplankton communities of eutrophic freshwater bodies (Kerala, India) in relation to the physicochemical water quality parameters," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 259-290, January.
    2. Zu-Xing Wang & Zheng-Sheng He & Wei-Ming He, 2021. "Nighttime climate warming enhances inhibitory effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the success of invasive Solidago canadensis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Sabine Dritz & Rebecca A. Nelson & Fernanda S. Valdovinos, 2023. "The role of intra-guild indirect interactions in assembling plant-pollinator networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Serra W. Buchanan & Megan Baskerville & Maren Oelbermann & Andrew M. Gordon & Naresh V. Thevathasan & Marney E. Isaac, 2020. "Plant Diversity and Agroecosystem Function in Riparian Agroforests: Providing Ecosystem Services and Land-Use Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Kaixuan Pan & Merijn Moens & Leon Marshall & Ellen Cieraad & Geert R de Snoo & Koos Biesmeijer, 2021. "Importance of natural land cover for plant species’ conservation: A nationwide study in The Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Lu Wu & Xu-Wen Wang & Zining Tao & Tong Wang & Wenlong Zuo & Yu Zeng & Yang-Yu Liu & Lei Dai, 2024. "Data-driven prediction of colonization outcomes for complex microbial communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Pierre Dupraz & Karine Latouche & Nadine Turpin, 2007. "Programmes agri-environnementaux en présence d’effets de seuil," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 82, pages 5-32.
    8. Fabio Bulleri & John F Bruno & Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi, 2008. "Beyond Competition: Incorporating Positive Interactions between Species to Predict Ecosystem Invasibility," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-5, June.
    9. Wang, Xiangrong & Peron, Thomas & Dubbeldam, Johan L.A. & Kéfi, Sonia & Moreno, Yamir, 2023. "Interspecific competition shapes the structural stability of mutualistic networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Liu, Xiaoqian & Bearup, Daniel & Liao, Jinbao, 2022. "Metacommunity robustness to invasion in mutualistic and antagonistic networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    11. Gregor Gorkiewicz & Gerhard G Thallinger & Slave Trajanoski & Stefan Lackner & Gernot Stocker & Thomas Hinterleitner & Christian Gülly & Christoph Högenauer, 2013. "Alterations in the Colonic Microbiota in Response to Osmotic Diarrhea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Jinhui Wu & Haoxin Li & Huawei Wan & Yongcai Wang & Chenxi Sun & Hongmin Zhou, 2021. "Analyzing the Relationship between Animal Diversity and the Remote Sensing Vegetation Parameters: The Case of Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Robert C. Cope & Joshua V. Ross & Talia A. Wittmann & Michael J. Watts & Phillip Cassey, 2019. "Predicting the Risk of Biological Invasions Using Environmental Similarity and Transport Network Connectedness," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 35-53, January.
    14. Nothaaß, Dorian & Taubert, Franziska & Huth, Andreas & Clark, Adam Thomas, 2023. "Modelling species invasion using a metapopulation model with variable mortality and stochastic birth-death processes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    15. Villanueva, Maria Concepcion S. & Isumbisho, Mwapu & Kaningini, Boniface & Moreau, Jacques & Micha, Jean-Claude, 2008. "Modeling trophic interactions in Lake Kivu: What roles do exotics play?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 422-438.
    16. Simianer, H., 2005. "Decision making in livestock conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 559-572, June.
    17. Wen Lin & Guofa Zhou & Xinyue Cheng & Rumei Xu, 2007. "Fast Economic Development Accelerates Biological Invasions in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-6, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:475:y:2023:i:c:s0304380022003155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.