IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v467y2022ics030438002200062x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying root turnover in grasslands from biomass dynamics: Application of the growth-maintenance respiration paradigm and re-analysis of historical data

Author

Listed:
  • Amato, Matthew T.
  • Giménez, Daniel

Abstract

Root turnover rates define how frequently plants replace their root systems and input organic matter into soil. Turnover rates are often computed using measurements of total living and dead (standing) root biomass (r) by assuming gross and net production are equivalent during the growing season. This assumption may be inappropriate in grasslands where root lifespans are relatively short, and decomposition substantially offsets growth. The objective of this study was to quantify turnover rates from measurements of r over time assuming growth and decomposition happen simultaneously, and that net r changes (ΔrΔt) decrease linearly as the size of r increases (first-order kinetics). These hypotheses were interpreted with the growth-maintenance respiration paradigm (GMRP) based on whether daily growth is constant (GP) or reduced by the costs of tissue maintenance (MP). The two parameters of the linear GMRP models were inferred using Bayesian methods from 111 growing season records of r versus ΔrΔt from 15 grasslands. Two-level (hierarchical) inferences were setup for the 14 grasslands that had multiple records, assuming parameters from each grassland originated from the same population. For the grassland with one record, a single-level inference was conducted. A total of 89 records, at least one per grassland, substantially supported the GMRP models. Median predicted turnover rates based on production/decomposition for the GP and MP models were 1.8/1.1 and 1.4/1.2 per growing season, respectively. These estimates were 3 to 7 times faster than those from traditional algorithms that neglect decomposition, suggesting organic matter inputs from roots may be larger than expected in some grasslands, especially where growth occurs almost year-round.

Suggested Citation

  • Amato, Matthew T. & Giménez, Daniel, 2022. "Quantifying root turnover in grasslands from biomass dynamics: Application of the growth-maintenance respiration paradigm and re-analysis of historical data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:467:y:2022:i:c:s030438002200062x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002200062X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smithwick, Erica A.H. & Lucash, Melissa S. & McCormack, M. Luke & Sivandran, Gajan, 2014. "Improving the representation of roots in terrestrial models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 291(C), pages 193-204.
    2. McCormack, M. Luke & Crisfield, Elizabeth & Raczka, Brett & Schnekenburger, Frank & Eissenstat, David M. & Smithwick, Erica A.H., 2015. "Sensitivity of four ecological models to adjustments in fine root turnover rate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 107-117.
    3. Z Y Yuan & Han Y H Chen, 2012. "Indirect Methods Produce Higher Estimates of Fine Root Production and Turnover Rates than Direct Methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-6, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keane, Robert E. & McKenzie, Donald & Falk, Donald A. & Smithwick, Erica A.H. & Miller, Carol & Kellogg, Lara-Karena B., 2015. "Representing climate, disturbance, and vegetation interactions in landscape models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 33-47.
    2. McCormack, M. Luke & Crisfield, Elizabeth & Raczka, Brett & Schnekenburger, Frank & Eissenstat, David M. & Smithwick, Erica A.H., 2015. "Sensitivity of four ecological models to adjustments in fine root turnover rate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 107-117.
    3. Anciaes, Paulo & Jones, Peter, 2020. "Transport policy for liveability – Valuing the impacts on movement, place, and society," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 157-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:467:y:2022:i:c:s030438002200062x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.