IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v359y2017icp229-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for uncertainty in predictions of a marine species: Integrating population genetics to verify past distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Chefaoui, Rosa M.
  • Serrão, Ester A.

Abstract

We develop a new perspective on the uncertainties affecting the predictions of coastal species distributions using patterns of genetic diversity to assess the congruence of hindcasted distribution models. We model the niche of the subtidal seagrass Cymodocea nodosa, for which previous phylogeographic findings are used to contrast hypotheses for the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) in the Mediterranean and adjacent Atlantic coastal regions. We focus on amelioration of sampling bias, and explore the influence of other sources of uncertainty such as the number of variables, Ocean General Circulation Models (OGCMs), and thresholds used. To do that, we test geographical and environmental filtering of presences, and a species-specific weighted filter related to political boundaries for background data. Contrary to our initial hypothesis that reducing sampling bias by means of geographical, environmental or background filtering would enhance predictive power and reliability of the models, none of these approaches consistently improved performance. These counter-intuitive results might be explained by the higher relative occurrence area (ROA) inherent to linear coastal study areas in relation to terrestrial regions, which may cause worse predictions and, thus, higher variability among models. We found that the Ocean General Circulation Models (OGCMs), the threshold and, to a smaller extent, the number of variables used, conditioned greatly the variability of the predictions in both accuracy and geographic range. Despite these uncertainties, all models achieved the goal of identifying long-term persistence regions (glacial refugia) where the highest genetic diversity for Cymodocea nodosa is found nowadays. However, only the CCSM corroborated the hypothesis, raised in previous studies, of a vicariant process in shaping the species’ genetic structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Chefaoui, Rosa M. & Serrão, Ester A., 2017. "Accounting for uncertainty in predictions of a marine species: Integrating population genetics to verify past distributions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 229-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:359:y:2017:i:c:p:229-239
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016304215
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chefaoui, Rosa M. & Lobo, Jorge M., 2008. "Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 478-486.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melo-Merino, Sara M. & Reyes-Bonilla, Héctor & Lira-Noriega, Andrés, 2020. "Ecological niche models and species distribution models in marine environments: A literature review and spatial analysis of evidence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    2. Iturbide, Maialen & Bedia, Joaquín & Herrera, Sixto & del Hierro, Oscar & Pinto, Miriam & Gutiérrez, Jose Manuel, 2015. "A framework for species distribution modelling with improved pseudo-absence generation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 166-174.
    3. Doko, Tomoko & Fukui, Hiromichi & Kooiman, Andre & Toxopeus, A.G. & Ichinose, Tomohiro & Chen, Wenbo & Skidmore, A.K., 2011. "Identifying habitat patches and potential ecological corridors for remnant Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus japonicus) populations in Japan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 748-761.
    4. Jiang, Dong & Wang, Qian & Ding, Fangyu & Fu, Jingying & Hao, Mengmeng, 2019. "Potential marginal land resources of cassava worldwide: A data-driven analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 167-173.
    5. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2010. "Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1995-2002.
    6. Coro, Gianpaolo & Pagano, Pasquale & Ellenbroek, Anton, 2013. "Combining simulated expert knowledge with Neural Networks to produce Ecological Niche Models for Latimeria chalumnae," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 55-63.
    7. Haider, Saira M. & Benscoter, Allison M. & Pearlstine, Leonard & D'Acunto, Laura E. & Romañach, Stephanie S., 2021. "Landscape-scale drivers of endangered Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow (Ammospiza maritima mirabilis) presence using an ensemble modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 461(C).
    8. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    9. Stokland, Jogeir N. & Halvorsen, Rune & Støa, Bente, 2011. "Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1800-1809.
    10. Watling, James I. & Romañach, Stephanie S. & Bucklin, David N. & Speroterra, Carolina & Brandt, Laura A. & Pearlstine, Leonard G. & Mazzotti, Frank J., 2012. "Do bioclimate variables improve performance of climate envelope models?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 79-85.
    11. Brice B Hanberry & Hong S He & Brian J Palik, 2012. "Pseudoabsence Generation Strategies for Species Distribution Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.
    12. VanDerWal, Jeremy & Shoo, Luke P. & Graham, Catherine & Williams, Stephen E., 2009. "Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(4), pages 589-594.
    13. Senait D Senay & Susan P Worner & Takayoshi Ikeda, 2013. "Novel Three-Step Pseudo-Absence Selection Technique for Improved Species Distribution Modelling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Hengl, Tomislav & Sierdsema, Henk & Radović, Andreja & Dilo, Arta, 2009. "Spatial prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence-only records: combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regression-kriging," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3499-3511.
    15. Laze, Kuenda & Gordon, Ascelin, 2016. "Incorporating natural and human factors in habitat modelling and spatial prioritisation for the Lynx lynx martinoi," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 17-31.
    16. Sebastián Block & Frédérik Saltré & Marta Rodríguez-Rey & Damien A Fordham & Ingmar Unkel & Corey J A Bradshaw, 2016. "Where to Dig for Fossils: Combining Climate-Envelope, Taphonomy and Discovery Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Peiwei Fan & Mengmeng Hao & Fangyu Ding & Dong Jiang & Donglin Dong, 2020. "Quantifying Global Potential Marginal Land Resources for Switchgrass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:359:y:2017:i:c:p:229-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.