IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v225y2012icp66-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of home range estimators for homogeneous and inhomogeneous point patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Downs, Joni A.
  • Heller, Justin H.
  • Loraamm, Rebecca
  • Stein, Dana Oppenheim
  • McDaniel, Cassandra
  • Onorato, Dave

Abstract

The only assumption of kernel density estimation, the most popular method of animal home range delineation, is that sample points used to approximate the utilization distribution are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.), or what is termed ‘homogeneous’ or ‘stationary’. This research evaluated the accuracy of several home range estimators for both homogeneous and inhomogeneous point patterns of animal tracking data. A novel technique was developed to simulate home ranges from an extensive database of observed Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) locations. Thirty-five homogeneous and inhomogeneous point distributions, each, were generated and used to delineate known home ranges for individual animals. Random samples of 100, 250, 500, and 1000 points from each simulated distribution were used to evaluate the accuracy of fixed and adaptive kernel density estimation (KDE), local nearest neighbor convex hull (k-LoCoH), and characteristic hull polygon (CHP) methods for delineating home ranges. Both fixed and adaptive KDE overestimated home ranges by up to 30% for homogeneous samples and underestimated areas by about 50% for inhomogeneous ones. The k-LoCoH method performed relatively better than KDE, tending to produce slight underestimates of home range sizes, but its performance was widely affected by both homogeneity and sample size. The CHP method produced relatively unbiased estimates of home range sizes for both types of samples, with results fairly robust to sample size. These findings demonstrate the influence of inhomogeneity or nonstationarity in animal locational data on the accuracy of home range estimation methods and suggest that ecologists should consider multiple underlying statistical assumptions when selecting a home range estimator.

Suggested Citation

  • Downs, Joni A. & Heller, Justin H. & Loraamm, Rebecca & Stein, Dana Oppenheim & McDaniel, Cassandra & Onorato, Dave, 2012. "Accuracy of home range estimators for homogeneous and inhomogeneous point patterns," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 66-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:225:y:2012:i:c:p:66-73
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011005308
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry, Ronald P. & McIntyre, Julie, 2011. "Estimating animal densities and home range in regions with irregular boundaries and holes: A lattice-based alternative to the kernel density estimator," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1666-1672.
    2. Rayfield, Bronwyn & Moilanen, Atte & Fortin, Marie-Josée, 2009. "Incorporating consumer–resource spatial interactions in reserve design," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 725-733.
    3. Downs, Joni A. & Gates, Robert J. & Murray, Alan T., 2008. "Estimating carrying capacity for sandhill cranes using habitat suitability and spatial optimization models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 284-292.
    4. Mitchell, Michael S. & Powell, Roger A., 2008. "Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 409-414.
    5. Wayne M Getz & Scott Fortmann-Roe & Paul C Cross & Andrew J Lyons & Sadie J Ryan & Christopher C Wilmers, 2007. "LoCoH: Nonparameteric Kernel Methods for Constructing Home Ranges and Utilization Distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Greg McSwiggan & Adrian Baddeley & Gopalan Nair, 2017. "Kernel Density Estimation on a Linear Network," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(2), pages 324-345, June.
    2. Arii, Ken & Caspersen, John P. & Jones, Trevor A. & Thomas, Sean C., 2008. "A selection harvesting algorithm for use in spatially explicit individual-based forest simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 251-266.
    3. Jiao Jieying & Hu Guanyu & Yan Jun, 2021. "A Bayesian marked spatial point processes model for basketball shot chart," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 77-90, June.
    4. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    5. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    6. Alan T. Murray & Ran Wei & Richard L. Church & Matthew R. Niblett, 2019. "Addressing risks and uncertainty in forest land use modeling," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 319-338, September.
    7. Vijay Rajagopal & Gregory Bass & Cameron G Walker & David J Crossman & Amorita Petzer & Anthony Hickey & Ivo Siekmann & Masahiko Hoshijima & Mark H Ellisman & Edmund J Crampin & Christian Soeller, 2015. "Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, September.
    8. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Liao, Jinbao & Li, Zhenqing & Quets, Jan J. & Nijs, Ivan, 2013. "Effects of space partitioning in a plant species diversity model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 271-278.
    10. Abdollah Jalilian, 2017. "Modelling and classification of species abundance: a case study in the Barro Colorado Island plot," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2401-2409, October.
    11. Herguido Sevillano, E. & Lavado Contador, J.F. & Schnabel, S. & Pulido, M. & Ibáñez, J., 2018. "Using spatial models of temporal tree dynamics to evaluate the implementation of EU afforestation policies in rangelands of SW Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 166-175.
    12. Athanasios C. Micheas & Jiaxun Chen, 2018. "sppmix: Poisson point process modeling using normal mixture models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1767-1798, December.
    13. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    14. Mathieu Pruvot & Manigandan Lejeune & Susan Kutz & Wendy Hutchins & Marco Musiani & Alessandro Massolo & Karin Orsel, 2016. "Better Alone or in Ill Company? The Effect of Migration and Inter-Species Comingling on Fascioloides magna Infection in Elk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Raphaël Jauslin & Bardia Panahbehagh & Yves Tillé, 2022. "Sequential spatially balanced sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    16. Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Gao, Shan & Su, Meirong & Zhang, Yan, 2015. "Designing a multi-species spatially explicit nature reserve network construction framework based on extinction probability: A case study of Wuyishan city," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 109-117.
    17. Davies, Tilman M. & Jones, Khair & Hazelton, Martin L., 2016. "Symmetric adaptive smoothing regimens for estimation of the spatial relative risk function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 12-28.
    18. Catherine Linard & Marius Gilbert & Robert W Snow & Abdisalan M Noor & Andrew J Tatem, 2012. "Population Distribution, Settlement Patterns and Accessibility across Africa in 2010," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    19. Yigang Wei & Cui Huang & Patrick T. I. Lam & Yong Sha & Yong Feng, 2015. "Using Urban-Carrying Capacity as a Benchmark for Sustainable Urban Development: An Empirical Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-25, March.
    20. D'Angelo, Nicoletta & Adelfio, Giada & Mateu, Jorge, 2023. "Locally weighted minimum contrast estimation for spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:225:y:2012:i:c:p:66-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.