IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v37y2016icp267-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing chained dynamic fund protection

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Heejae
  • Jeon, Junkee
  • Kang, Myungjoo

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new kind of dynamic fund protection (DFP). In contrast to the usual DFP, our newly developed DFP has two protection levels and protection is activated only when the value of underlying asset reaches upper protection levels. This kind of product has a structure similar to that of the chained barrier option proposed by Jun and Ku (2012). In this context, we name our newly designed equity-linked product as chained dynamic fund protection (CDFP). Buying CDFP can be advantageous for both vendors and investors compared to buy usual DFP. Relatively small downside risk for CDFP is beneficial for vendors. Also for investors, the price they cost for protection of CDFP is cheaper than that of usual DFP. Furthermore, investors can handle the price of protection by adjusting the level of upper protection as they desired. In this paper, we derive a closed-form formula for CDFP using reflection principle under Black–Scholes framework. Furthermore, we represent numerical results for values of CDFP according to various parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Heejae & Jeon, Junkee & Kang, Myungjoo, 2016. "Pricing chained dynamic fund protection," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 267-278.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:267-278
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2016.05.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940816300365
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2016.05.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans Gerber & Gérard Pafumi, 2000. "Pricing Dynamic Investment Fund Protection," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 28-37.
    2. Chu, Chi Chiu & Kwok, Yue Kuen, 2004. "Reset and withdrawal rights in dynamic fund protection," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 273-295, April.
    3. Ko, Bangwon & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Wei, Li, 2010. "Pricing maturity guarantee with dynamic withdrawal benefit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 216-223, October.
    4. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 2003. "Pricing Perpetual Fund Protection with Withdrawal Option," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 60-77.
    5. Hoi Ying Wong & Chun Man Chan, 2008. "Turbo warrants under stochastic volatility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(7), pages 739-751.
    6. Wong, Hoi Ying & Chan, Chun Man, 2007. "Lookback options and dynamic fund protection under multiscale stochastic volatility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 357-385, May.
    7. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 2003. "Pricing Lookback Options and Dynamic Guarantees," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 48-66.
    8. Lee, Hangsuck, 2003. "Pricing equity-indexed annuities with path-dependent options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 677-690, December.
    9. Junichi Imai & Phelim Boyle, 2001. "Dynamic Fund Protection," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 31-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Geonwoo & Jeon, Junkee, 2018. "Closed-form solutions for valuing partial lookback options with random initiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 321-327.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linyi Qian & Zhuo Jin & Wei Wang & Lyu Chen, 2018. "Pricing dynamic fund protections for a hyperexponential jump diffusion process," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 210-221, January.
    2. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2012. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits and other contingent options: A discounted density approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 73-92.
    3. Ko, Bangwon & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Wei, Li, 2010. "Pricing maturity guarantee with dynamic withdrawal benefit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 216-223, October.
    4. Hertrich Markus, 2016. "The Costs of Implementing a Unilateral One-Sided Exchange Rate Target Zone," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 91-120, May.
    5. Zhou, Jiang & Wu, Lan, 2015. "The time of deducting fees for variable annuities under the state-dependent fee structure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 125-134.
    6. Lee, Hangsuck & Kim, Eunchae & Ko, Bangwon, 2022. "Valuing lookback options with barrier," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Jun Sekine, 2012. "Long-term optimal portfolios with floor," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 369-401, July.
    8. Wong, Hoi Ying & Chan, Chun Man, 2007. "Lookback options and dynamic fund protection under multiscale stochastic volatility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 357-385, May.
    9. Chu, Chi Chiu & Kwok, Yue Kuen, 2004. "Reset and withdrawal rights in dynamic fund protection," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 273-295, April.
    10. Gan, Guojun, 2013. "Application of data clustering and machine learning in variable annuity valuation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 795-801.
    11. Moore, Kristen S., 2009. "Optimal surrender strategies for equity-indexed annuity investors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Markus Hertrich & Heinz Zimmermann, 2017. "On the Credibility of the Euro/Swiss Franc Floor: A Financial Market Perspective," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(2-3), pages 567-578, March.
    13. Qian, Linyi & Wang, Wei & Wang, Rongming & Tang, Yincai, 2010. "Valuation of equity-indexed annuity under stochastic mortality and interest rate," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 123-129, October.
    14. R. Guy Thomas, 2023. "Long-term option pricing with a lower reflecting barrier," Papers 2302.05808, arXiv.org.
    15. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Lee, Minha, 2023. "Partial quanto lookback options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Kijima, Masaaki & Wong, Tony, 2007. "Pricing of Ratchet equity-indexed annuities under stochastic interest rates," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 317-338, November.
    17. El Karoui, Nicole & Jeanblanc, Monique & Lacoste, Vincent, 2005. "Optimal portfolio management with American capital guarantee," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 449-468, March.
    18. Chiu, Yu-Fen & Hsieh, Ming-Hua & Tsai, Chenghsien, 2019. "Valuation and analysis on complex equity indexed annuities," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Dean Buckner & Kevin Dowd & Hardy Hulley, 2022. "Arbitrage Problems with Reflected Geometric Brownian Motion," Papers 2201.05312, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    20. V. M. Belyaev, 2011. "Pricing Variable Annuity Contracts with High-Water Mark Feature," Papers 1108.4393, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2011.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:267-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.