IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v7y2003i1p48-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing Lookback Options and Dynamic Guarantees

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Gerber
  • Elias Shiu

Abstract

Pricing exotic options or guarantees in equity-indexed annuities can be problematic. The authors present closed-form formulas for pricing lookback options and dynamic guarantees that facilitate the hedging and reserving for such products. The principal tool used is a closed-form expression for B(u, T), the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the expected excess of the running maximum of a Wiener process above a positive constant u in a finite time interval of length T. If the aggregate net income of a company is modeled with a Wiener process, then the excess of the running maximum above u can be interpreted as aggregate dividend payments, and the quantity B(u, T) is the expectation of the discounted value of the dividend payments up to time T. The formula for B(u, T) is used to price European lookback options (call and put, fixed and floating strike). It is also used to price dynamic fund protection, which is a guarantee on an investment fund: The number of units of the investment fund is increased whenever necessary, so that their total value does not fall below a guaranteed level. The guaranteed level can be stochastic, such as that given by a stock index. Some well-known results for the first passage time of the Wiener process are explained in the appendix.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 2003. "Pricing Lookback Options and Dynamic Guarantees," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 48-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:7:y:2003:i:1:p:48-66
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2003.10596076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2003.10596076
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2003.10596076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Yin & Jia, Lifen, 2021. "Pricing formulas of barrier-lookback option in uncertain financial markets," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. L. Ramprasath, 2018. "A simpler algorithm to price American Lookback options in a discrete stochastic volatility model," Working papers 294, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    3. Qian, Linyi & Wang, Wei & Wang, Rongming & Tang, Yincai, 2010. "Valuation of equity-indexed annuity under stochastic mortality and interest rate," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 123-129, October.
    4. V. M. Belyaev, 2011. "Pricing Variable Annuity Contracts with High-Water Mark Feature," Papers 1108.4393, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2011.
    5. Han, Heejae & Jeon, Junkee & Kang, Myungjoo, 2016. "Pricing chained dynamic fund protection," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 267-278.
    6. Gan, Guojun, 2013. "Application of data clustering and machine learning in variable annuity valuation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 795-801.
    7. Gan Guojun & Valdez Emiliano A., 2017. "Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios: Monte Carlo simulation and synthetic datasets," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 354-374, December.
    8. Kijima, Masaaki & Wong, Tony, 2007. "Pricing of Ratchet equity-indexed annuities under stochastic interest rates," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 317-338, November.
    9. Gan, Guojun & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2015. "Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios under nested simulation: A functional data approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 138-150.
    10. Orozco-Garcia, Carolina & Schmeiser, Hato, 2015. "How sensitive is the pricing of lookback and interest rate guarantees when changing the modelling assumptions?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 77-93.
    11. Chiu, Yu-Fen & Hsieh, Ming-Hua & Tsai, Chenghsien, 2019. "Valuation and analysis on complex equity indexed annuities," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Lee, Minha, 2023. "Partial quanto lookback options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Alexander Bohnert, 2015. "The Impact of Guarantees on the Performance of Pension Saving Schemes: Insights from the Literature," Risks, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-28, November.
    14. Sarah Dendievel & Guy Latouche, 2017. "Approximations for Time-Dependent Distributions in Markovian Fluid Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 285-309, March.
    15. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Lee, Minha, 2022. "Foreign equity lookback options with guarantees," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    16. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2012. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits and other contingent options: A discounted density approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 73-92.
    17. Lee, Hangsuck & Kim, Eunchae & Ko, Bangwon, 2022. "Valuing lookback options with barrier," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:7:y:2003:i:1:p:48-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.