IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v7y2003i2p60-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing Perpetual Fund Protection with Withdrawal Option

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Gerber
  • Elias Shiu

Abstract

Consider an American option that provides the amountif it is exercised at time t, t ≥0. For simplicity of language, we interpret S1(t) and S2(t) as the prices of two stocks. The option payoff is guaranteed not to fall below the price of stock 1 and is indexed by the price of stock 2 in the sense that, if F(t) > S1(t), the instantaneous growth rate of F(t) is that of S2(t). We call this option the dynamic fund protection option. For the two stock prices, the bivariate Black-Scholes model with constant dividend-yield rates is assumed. In the case of a perpetual option, closed-form expressions for the optimal exercise strategy and the price of the option are given. Furthermore, this price is compared with the price of the perpetual maximum option, and it is shown that the optimal exercise of the maximum option occurs before that of the dynamic fund protection option.Two general concepts in the theory of option pricing are illustrated: the smooth pasting condition and the construction of the replicating portfolio. The general result can be applied to two special cases. One is where the guaranteed level S1(t) is a deterministic exponential or constant function. The other is where S2(t) is an exponential or constant function; in this case, known results concerning the pricing of Russian options are retrieved. Finally, we consider a generalization of the perpetual lookback put option that has payoff [F(t) − κS1(t)], if it is exercised at time t. This option can be priced with the same technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 2003. "Pricing Perpetual Fund Protection with Withdrawal Option," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 60-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:7:y:2003:i:2:p:60-77
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2003.10596087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2003.10596087
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2003.10596087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wong, Hoi Ying & Chan, Chun Man, 2007. "Lookback options and dynamic fund protection under multiscale stochastic volatility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 357-385, May.
    2. Cheung, Ka Chun & Yang, Hailiang, 2005. "Optimal stopping behavior of equity-linked investment products with regime switching," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 599-614, December.
    3. Moore, Kristen S., 2009. "Optimal surrender strategies for equity-indexed annuity investors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Linyi Qian & Zhuo Jin & Wei Wang & Lyu Chen, 2018. "Pricing dynamic fund protections for a hyperexponential jump diffusion process," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 210-221, January.
    5. Chu, Chi Chiu & Kwok, Yue Kuen, 2004. "Reset and withdrawal rights in dynamic fund protection," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 273-295, April.
    6. Jun Sekine, 2012. "Long-term optimal portfolios with floor," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 369-401, July.
    7. Han, Heejae & Jeon, Junkee & Kang, Myungjoo, 2016. "Pricing chained dynamic fund protection," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 267-278.
    8. Zhou, Jiang & Wu, Lan, 2015. "The time of deducting fees for variable annuities under the state-dependent fee structure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 125-134.
    9. Ko, Bangwon & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Wei, Li, 2010. "Pricing maturity guarantee with dynamic withdrawal benefit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 216-223, October.
    10. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2012. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits and other contingent options: A discounted density approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 73-92.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:7:y:2003:i:2:p:60-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.