IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v79y2017icp228-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lemonade for Life—A pilot study on a hope-infused, trauma-informed approach to help families understand their past and focus on the future

Author

Listed:
  • Counts, Jacqueline M.
  • Gillam, Rebecca J.
  • Perico, Shabrie
  • Eggers, Keil L.

Abstract

The Adverse Childhood Experiences' (ACEs) research provided groundbreaking evidence that events that occur early in life can impede core life capabilities and lead to significant negative social, behavioral, and physical outcomes. While the research is widely known, the translation and application for use with families has been lacking. In response to this gap, Lemonade for Life was developed to help professionals who work directly with families understand how to use the ACEs research as a tool to build hope and resilience. A developmental evaluation was conducted to learn about how Lemonade for Life participants integrate ACEs in their work with families, as well as whether and how the Lemonade for Life training and materials influenced their work. Focus group and survey data were collected from 24 home visitors and parent educators and parent educators, who participated in a Lemonade for Life training. Findings indicate that Lemonade for Life may be a useful tool for translating ACEs research into practice with families. Participants perceived that following the integration of what they learned through Lemonade for Life into their work, the families they served were more engaged in services and better able to understand their past experiences and current life circumstances. Results suggest a continued need to assess and focus on the hope and mindset of professionals who work directly with families to optimize opportunities for change.

Suggested Citation

  • Counts, Jacqueline M. & Gillam, Rebecca J. & Perico, Shabrie & Eggers, Keil L., 2017. "Lemonade for Life—A pilot study on a hope-infused, trauma-informed approach to help families understand their past and focus on the future," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 228-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:228-234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740917304528
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulsell, D. & Del Grosso, P. & Supplee, L., 2014. "Supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based home visiting programs: Assessing the implementation knowledge base," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(9), pages 1624-1632.
    2. Diane Paulsell & Patricia Del Grosso & Lauren Supplee, "undated". "Supporting Replication and Scale-Up of Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs: Assessing the Implementation Knowledge Base," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f40baa547eed4b9bb262087a3, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pharris, Angela B. & Munoz, Ricky T. & Hellman, Chan M., 2022. "Hope and resilience as protective factors linked to lower burnout among child welfare workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Lisa Bunting & Lorna Montgomery & Suzanne Mooney & Mandi MacDonald & Stephen Coulter & David Hayes & Gavin Davidson, 2019. "Trauma Informed Child Welfare Systems—A Rapid Evidence Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen Lee & Sarah Shea Crowne & Melanie Estarziau & Keith Kranker & Charles Michalopoulos & Anne Warren & Tod Mijanovich & Jill H. Filene & Anne Duggan & Virginia Knox, "undated". "The Effects of Home Visiting on Prenatal Health, Birth Outcomes, and Health Care Use in the First Year of Life: Final Implementation and Impact Findings from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Progra," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a9626a8d90bf4f01811d0c9d7, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Goldberg, Jessica & Bumgarner, Erin & Jacobs, Francine, 2016. "Measuring program- and individual-level fidelity in a home visiting program for adolescent parents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 163-173.
    3. Wen, Xiaoli & Korfmacher, Jon & Hans, Sydney L., 2016. "Change over time in young mothers' engagement with a community-based doula home visiting program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 116-126.
    4. Finders, Jennifer K. & Díaz, Guadalupe & Geldhof, G. John & Sektnan, Michaella & Rennekamp, Denise, 2016. "The impact of parenting education on parent and child behaviors: Moderators by income and ethnicity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 199-209.
    5. Dauber, Sarah & John, Tiffany & Hogue, Aaron & Nugent, Jessica & Hernandez, Gina, 2017. "Development and implementation of a screen-and-refer approach to addressing maternal depression, substance use, and intimate partner violence in home visiting clients," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 157-167.
    6. Sarah A. Avellar & Jaime Thomas & Rebecca Kleinman & Emily Sama-Miller & Sara E. Woodruff & Rebecca Coughlin & T’Pring R. Westbrook, 2017. "External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(4), pages 283-325, August.
    7. Diane Paulsell & Jaime Thomas & Shannon Monahan & Neil S. Seftor, 2017. "A Trusted Source of Information," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 50-77, February.
    8. Robert Ammerman & Anne Duggan & John List & Lauren Supplee & Dana Suskind, 2021. "The role of open science practices in scaling evidence-based prevention programs," Natural Field Experiments 00741, The Field Experiments Website.
    9. Eric Morris & Noelle Denny-Brown, "undated". "Expanding Integrated Employment: Early Lessons from Scaling Up Pathways to Careers," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fc12444e564e4ac2bd704c16a, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:228-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.