IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i10p1430-1436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing performance-based contracts between agencies and service providers: Results from a Getting To Outcomes support system with social service agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah, Gordon
  • Ray, Marilyn
  • Wandersman, Abraham
  • Chien, Victoria H.

Abstract

This study examines an intervention designed to enhance the ability of social service agencies to implement performance-based contracting using the Getting To Outcomes® (GTO®) accountability framework. The GTO approach to contracting focused specifically on outcomes, provided a comprehensive framework for contracts, and provided multi-component support to agencies. The following results were demonstrated after a nine-month intervention: (1) participants reported being more knowledgeable about 10 areas of outcome accountability; (2) the quality of contracts was rated as improved (especially in regard to measurable outcomes), but still needing improvement; and (3) increased collaboration was reported between funders and providers. Limitations, implications and future directions of the study are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah, Gordon & Ray, Marilyn & Wandersman, Abraham & Chien, Victoria H., 2010. "Developing performance-based contracts between agencies and service providers: Results from a Getting To Outcomes support system with social service agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1430-1436, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:10:p:1430-1436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00183-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unruh, Jennifer K. & Hodgkin, Dominic, 2004. "The role of contract design in privatization of child welfare services: the Kansas experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(8), pages 771-783, August.
    2. Wandersman, Abraham & Imm, Pamela & Chinman, Matthew & Kaftarian, Shakeh, 2000. "Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 389-395, August.
    3. Meezan, William & McBeath, Bowen, 2008. "Market-based disparities in foster care outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 388-406, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fuguo Cao & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Determinants of Pay-for-Performance in PPP Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Chuang, Emmeline & McBeath, Bowen & Bunger, Alicia C., 2014. "Private child welfare agency managers' perceptions of the effectiveness of different performance management strategies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 133-141.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wasserman, Deborah L., 2010. "Using a systems orientation and foundational theory to enhance theory-driven human service program evaluations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 67-80, May.
    2. repec:ocp:rpaper:pp-1704 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. McBeath, Bowen & Briggs, Harold E. & Aisenberg, Eugene, 2009. "The role of child welfare managers in promoting agency performance through experimentation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 112-118, January.
    4. Garcia, Antonio R. & Circo, Elizabeth & DeNard, Christina & Hernandez, Natalie, 2015. "Barriers and facilitators to delivering effective mental health practice strategies for youth and families served by the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 110-122.
    5. L. Shakiyla Smith & Natalie J. Wilkins & Roderick J. McClure, 2021. "A systemic approach to achieving population‐level impact in injury and violence prevention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 21-30, January.
    6. McCabe, Lisa A. & Ruberti, Mary R. & Endres, Thomas, 2022. "Sustaining program implementation: A co-constructed technical assistance process to support continuous high-quality implementation of the Therapeutic Crisis Intervention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Wells, Rebecca & Jolles, Mónica Pérez & Chuang, Emmeline & McBeath, Bowen & Collins-Camargo, Crystal, 2014. "Trends in local public child welfare agencies 1999–2009," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 93-100.
    8. Adshead Maura & Boyle Richard & Colgan Anne, 2020. "A review of citizen engagement in our public service," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(3), pages 23-44, August.
    9. Jesse Chandler, "undated". "Technical Appendix: Considerations for Measuring T/TA Performance," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4a1a00e145df4090b5e1f6e63, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Hubel, Grace S. & Schreier, Alayna & Hansen, David J. & Wilcox, Brian L., 2013. "A case study of the effects of privatization of child welfare on services for children and families: The Nebraska experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2049-2058.
    11. Flaherty, Chris & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Lee, Elizabeth, 2008. "Privatization of child welfare services: Lessons learned from experienced states regarding site readiness assessment and planning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 809-820, July.
    12. Albers, Bianca & Mildon, Robyn & Lyon, Aaron R. & Shlonsky, Aron, 2017. "Implementation frameworks in child, youth and family services – Results from a scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 101-116.
    13. Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana & Antle, Becky & Wandersman, Abraham & Cahn, Katharine, 2011. "Successful adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 622-633, May.
    14. McBeath, Bowen & Jolles, Mónica Pérez & Chuang, Emmeline & Bunger, Alicia C. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal, 2014. "Organizational responsiveness to children and families: Findings from a national survey of nonprofit child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 123-132.
    15. Tamara M. Haegerich & Corinne David-Ferdon & Rita K. Noonan & Brian J. Manns & Holly C. Billie, 2017. "Technical Packages in Injury and Violence Prevention to Move Evidence Into Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 78-108, February.
    16. Steen, Julie A. & Smith, Sarahlin, 2012. "An organizational view of privatization: Is the private foster care agency superior to the public foster care agency?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 851-858.
    17. McBeath, Bowen & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Chuang, Emmeline & Wells, Rebecca & Bunger, Alicia C. & Jolles, Mónica Pérez, 2014. "New directions for research on the organizational and institutional context of child welfare agencies: Introduction to the symposium on “The Organizational and Managerial Context of Private Child Welf," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 83-92.
    18. Johnson, K.W. & Grube, J.W. & Ogilvie, K.A. & Collins, D. & Courser, M. & Dirks, L.G. & Ogilvie, D. & Driscoll, D., 2012. "A community prevention model to prevent children from inhaling and ingesting harmful legal products," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 113-123.
    19. Johnson, Knowlton & Hays, Carol & Center, Hayden & Daley, Charlotte, 2004. "Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 135-149, May.
    20. Stevenson, John F. & Florin, Paul & Mills, Dana Scott & Andrade, Marco, 2002. "Building evaluation capacity in human service organizations: a case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 233-243, August.
    21. Perez Jolles, Monica & McBeath, Bowen & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Chuang, Emmeline, 2022. "Organizational complexity within private child welfare agencies in the United States and impact on agency performance outlook," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:10:p:1430-1436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.