IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v30y2008i6p689-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From evolving discourses to new practice approaches in domestic violence and child protective services

Author

Listed:
  • Friend, Colleen
  • Shlonsky, Aron
  • Lambert, Liz

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of the discourse surrounding domestic violence (DV), explores how that discourse intersects with public child welfare (PCW), and makes some suggestions for improving the quality and consistency of services for families involved with these systems in both the United States and Canada. In particular, the discourse at the intersection of the two systems has focused on whether or not children's exposure to DV is maltreatment and, further, if it warrants placement in foster care. Within the PCW system itself, data seem to point to divisions in worker beliefs over what circumstances necessitate removal of children and what solutions should be pursued in order to achieve permanence. Legislation and courts have spoken to this complex issue. Given the tension and new developments in the field, this article proposes that harm reduction (HR), evidence-based practice (EBP), and differential response (DR) approaches can bring the two systems together in order to better serve families.

Suggested Citation

  • Friend, Colleen & Shlonsky, Aron & Lambert, Liz, 2008. "From evolving discourses to new practice approaches in domestic violence and child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 689-698, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:30:y:2008:i:6:p:689-698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(08)00038-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleck-Henderson, Ann, 2000. "Domestic violence in the child protection system: Seeing double," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 333-354, May.
    2. Kohl, Patricia L. & Edleson, Jeffrey L. & English, Diana J. & Barth, Richard P., 2005. "Domestic violence and pathways into child welfare services: Findings from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(11), pages 1167-1182, November.
    3. Mills, Linda G. & Friend, Colleen & Conroy, Kathryn & Fleck-Henderson, Ann & Krug, Stefan & Magen, Randy H. & Thomas, Rebecca L. & Trudeau, John H., 2000. "Child protection and domestic violence: Training, practice, and policy issues," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 315-332, May.
    4. Nixon, Kendra L. & Tutty, Leslie M. & Weaver-Dunlop, Gillian & Walsh, Christine A., 2007. "Do good intentions beget good policy? A review of child protection policies to address intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1469-1486, December.
    5. Conley, Amy, 2007. "Differential response: A critical examination of a secondary prevention model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1454-1468, November.
    6. Hartley, Carolyn C., 2004. "Severe domestic violence and child maltreatment: considering child physical abuse, neglect, and failure to protect," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 373-392, April.
    7. Moles, Kerry, 2008. "Bridging the divide between child welfare and domestic violence services: Deconstructing the change process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 674-688, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lawson, Jennifer, 2019. "Domestic violence as child maltreatment: Differential risks and outcomes among cases referred to child welfare agencies for domestic violence exposure," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 32-41.
    2. Tutty, Leslie M. & Nixon, Kendra, 2020. "Mothers abused by intimate partners: Comparisons of those with children placed by child protective services and those without," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Nikolova, K. & Postmus, J.L. & Buttner, C. & Bosk, E.A., 2020. "Working together to protect women and children from domestic violence: Factors influencing willingness to collaborate between organizations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Emily Keddell, 2014. "Current Debates on Variability in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Selected Literature Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Simmel, Cassandra & Shpiegel, Svetlana, 2013. "Describing the context and nature of emotional maltreatment reports in children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 626-633.
    6. Buckley, Helen & Whelan, Sadhbh & Carr, Nicola, 2011. "'Like waking up in a Franz Kafka novel': Service users' experiences of the child protection system when domestic violence and acrimonious separations are involved," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 126-133, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawson, Jennifer, 2019. "Domestic violence as child maltreatment: Differential risks and outcomes among cases referred to child welfare agencies for domestic violence exposure," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 32-41.
    2. Renner, Lynette M., 2011. ""I'm wondering if I am completely missing that": Foster care case managers and supervisors report on their IPV training," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 386-394, February.
    3. Renner, Lynette M., 2011. "The presence of IPV in foster care cases: Examining referrals for services, reunification goals, and system responsibility," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 980-990, June.
    4. Meyer, Andrea S. & McWey, Lenore M. & McKendrick, Wachell & Henderson, Tammy L., 2010. "Substance using parents, foster care, and termination of parental rights: The importance of risk factors for legal outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 639-649, May.
    5. Yoshihama, Mieko & Horrocks, Julie, 2010. "Risk of intimate partner violence: Role of childhood sexual abuse and sexual initiation in women in Japan," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 28-37, January.
    6. Friend, Colleen, 2000. "Woman abuse and child protection: A tumultuous marriage (volume ii)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 309-314, May.
    7. Emily Keddell, 2014. "Current Debates on Variability in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Selected Literature Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Simmel, Cassandra & Shpiegel, Svetlana, 2013. "Describing the context and nature of emotional maltreatment reports in children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 626-633.
    9. Fusco, Rachel A., 2013. "“It's hard enough to deal with all the abuse issues”: Child welfare workers' experiences with intimate partner violence on their caseloads," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1946-1953.
    10. Olszowy, Laura & Jaffe, Peter G. & Dawson, Myrna & Straatman, Anna-Lee & Saxton, Michael D., 2020. "Voices from the frontline: Child protection workers’ perspectives on barriers to assessing risk in domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Milani, Luca & Grumi, Serena & Camisasca, Elena & Miragoli, Sarah & Traficante, Daniela & Di Blasio, Paola, 2020. "Familial risk and protective factors affecting CPS professionals’ child removal decision: A decision tree analysis study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Buckley, Helen & Whelan, Sadhbh & Carr, Nicola, 2011. "'Like waking up in a Franz Kafka novel': Service users' experiences of the child protection system when domestic violence and acrimonious separations are involved," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 126-133, January.
    13. Park, Aely & Smith, Carolyn & Ireland, Timothy, 2012. "Equivalent harm? The relative roles of maltreatment and exposure to intimate partner violence in antisocial outcomes for young adults," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 962-972.
    14. Hartley, Carolyn C., 2004. "Severe domestic violence and child maltreatment: considering child physical abuse, neglect, and failure to protect," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 373-392, April.
    15. Nikolova, K. & Postmus, J.L. & Buttner, C. & Bosk, E.A., 2020. "Working together to protect women and children from domestic violence: Factors influencing willingness to collaborate between organizations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Moles, Kerry, 2008. "Bridging the divide between child welfare and domestic violence services: Deconstructing the change process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 674-688, June.
    17. Lee, Hee Yun & Lightfoot, Elizabeth & Edleson, Jeffrey L., 2008. "Differences among battered mothers in their involvement with child protection services: Could the perpetrator's biological relationship to the child have an impact?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1189-1197, October.
    18. Dinehart, Laura H. & Manfra, Louis & Katz, Lynne F. & Hartman, Suzanne C., 2012. "Associations between center-based care accreditation status and the early educational outcomes of children in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1072-1080.
    19. Nixon, Kendra L. & Tutty, Leslie M. & Weaver-Dunlop, Gillian & Walsh, Christine A., 2007. "Do good intentions beget good policy? A review of child protection policies to address intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1469-1486, December.
    20. English, Diana J. & Edleson, Jeffrey L. & Herrick, Mary E., 2005. "Domestic violence in one state's child protective caseload: A study of differential case dispositions and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(11), pages 1183-1201, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:30:y:2008:i:6:p:689-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.