IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v169y2025ics0190740925000040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Illuminating the complexity of decision making in child welfare using the decision making ecology: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Allan, Heather
  • Hollinshead, Dana
  • Rockwell, Kayla
  • Ender, Kaitlyn
  • Antwi-Boasiako, Kofi
  • O’Leary, Donna
  • Middel, Floor
  • Fluke, John

Abstract

Decision making in the context of child welfare is inherently complex and their lasting potential impact on families subject to them cannot be overstated. The Decision-Making Ecology is one framework for understanding this complexity as well as the interplay between various decision-making factors and the subsequent outcomes that they inform. The purpose of this scoping review was to understand the extent to which the Decision-Making Ecology has been employed in research examining case, decision-maker, organizational, and community factors’ associations with child welfare decisional outcomes. Our review of 56 studies found that most studies (n = 48, 86 %) examine case factors, organizational factors are the second most likely category to be explored (n = 42, 75 %), followed by decision-maker (n = 33, 59 %) and external factors (n = 29, 52 %). A majority of studies explored more than one domain; indeed, nearly 90 % of studies (n = 50) explored at least two domains while a mere six studies explored just one. Further, nearly 60 % of studies (n = 33) explored three domains while nearly a quarter (n = 13) explored all four. Across methodologies placement and substantiation were the most commonly explored outcomes in nearly a third and fifth of studies (n = 18, n = 12), respectively. While the results of our scoping review confirm the premise of the DME; when examining decisions and outcomes, decisional factor variation matters and DME framework continues to provide a useful scaffold for productive child welfare decision-making research. It also clearly demonstrates that there is ample room for more research in this area, particularly as it relates to proposing solutions to address the root causes of decisional variability and thus, inequitable outcomes for marginalized populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Allan, Heather & Hollinshead, Dana & Rockwell, Kayla & Ender, Kaitlyn & Antwi-Boasiako, Kofi & O’Leary, Donna & Middel, Floor & Fluke, John, 2025. "Illuminating the complexity of decision making in child welfare using the decision making ecology: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:169:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925000040
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925000040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mansell, James & Ota, Rissa & Erasmus, Ricus & Marks, Kip, 2011. "Reframing child protection: A response to a constant crisis of confidence in child protection," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2076-2086.
    2. Keddell, Emily & Cleaver, Kerri & Fitzmaurice, Luke, 2021. "The perspectives of community-based practitioners on preventing baby removals : Addressing legitimate and illegitimate factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Vis, Svein Arild & Lauritzen, Camilla & Fluke, John, 2021. "Screening decisions for non-abuse concerns reported to child protection agencies- a structural equation model for referral content and decision outcome," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Smith, Carrie & Fluke, John D. & Fallon, Barbara & Mishna, Faye & Decker Pierce, Barbara, 2017. "Role specialization and service integration in child welfare: Does organizational structure influence the decision to refer to supportive services?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 139-148.
    5. Jud, A. & Fallon, B. & Trocmé, N., 2012. "Who gets services and who does not? Multi-level approach to the decision for ongoing child welfare or referral to specialized services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 983-988.
    6. McDaniel, Marla, 2006. "In the eye of the beholder: The role of reporters in bringing families to the attention of child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 306-324, March.
    7. Ma, Jennifer & Fallon, Barbara & Alaggia, Ramona & Richard, Kenn, 2019. "First Nations children and disparities in transfers to ongoing child welfare services in Ontario following a child protection investigation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 207-216.
    8. Kearney, Aubrey D. & Wilson, Elisabeth S. & Hollinshead, Dana M. & Poletika, Michael & Kestian, Heather H. & Stigdon, Terry J. & Miller, Eric A. & Fluke, John D., 2023. "Child welfare triage: Use of screening threshold analysis to evaluate intake decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Fluke, John D. & Corwin, Tyler W. & Hollinshead, Dana M. & Maher, Erin J., 2016. "Family preservation or child safety? Associations between child welfare workers' experience, position, and perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 210-218.
    10. Antwi-Boasiako, Kofi & Fallon, Barbara & King, Bryn & Trocmé, Nico & Fluke, John, 2021. "Examining decision-making tools and child welfare involvement among Black families in Ontario, Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Emily Keddell, 2014. "Current Debates on Variability in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Selected Literature Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-25, November.
    12. Berrick, Jill Duerr & Skivenes, Marit & Roscoe, Joseph N., 2023. "Public perceptions of child protection, children’s rights, and personal values: An assessment of two states," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Allan, Heather & Harlaar, Nicole & Hollinshead, Dana & Drury, Ida & Merkel-Holguin, Lisa, 2017. "The impact of worker and agency characteristics on FGC referrals in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 229-237.
    14. Fong, Kelley, 2017. "Child welfare involvement and contexts of poverty: The role of parental adversities, social networks, and social services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 5-13.
    15. Sinha, Vandna & Ellenbogen, Stephen & Trocmé, Nico, 2013. "Substantiating neglect of first nations and non-aboriginal children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2080-2090.
    16. Storhaug, Anita Skårstad, 2023. "The decision-making ecology of child welfare emergency placements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Rolock, Nancy & Jantz, Ian & Abner, Kristin, 2015. "Community perceptions and foster care placement: A multi-level analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 186-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily Keddell, 2022. "Mechanisms of Inequity: The Impact of Instrumental Biases in the Child Protection System," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, May.
    2. O'Leary, Donna & Christie, Alistair & Perry, Ivan J. & Khashan, Ali S, 2024. "Determinants of receiving child protection and welfare services following initial assessment: A cross-sectional study from the Republic of Ireland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Kearney, Aubrey D. & Wilson, Elisabeth S. & Hollinshead, Dana M. & Poletika, Michael & Kestian, Heather H. & Stigdon, Terry J. & Miller, Eric A. & Fluke, John D., 2023. "Child welfare triage: Use of screening threshold analysis to evaluate intake decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Wilkins, David & Keddell, Emily, 2024. "Risk perceptions and experience in child protection decision-making: A comparative study of student social workers in Wales and Aotearoa New Zealand," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Chapman, Christopher, 2025. "Reifying risk and health: Cultural normativity, bureaucracy, and moral quandary in child abuse investigations in Japan," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Emily Keddell, 2019. "Algorithmic Justice in Child Protection: Statistical Fairness, Social Justice and the Implications for Practice," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Allan, Heather & Harlaar, Nicole & Hollinshead, Dana & Drury, Ida & Merkel-Holguin, Lisa, 2017. "The impact of worker and agency characteristics on FGC referrals in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 229-237.
    8. Keddell, Emily & Cleaver, Kerri & Fitzmaurice, Luke, 2021. "The perspectives of community-based practitioners on preventing baby removals : Addressing legitimate and illegitimate factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Robichaud, Marie-Joëlle & Pullen Sansfaçon, Annie & Poirier, Marie-Andrée, 2020. "Decision making at substantiation in cases involving racialized families: Child protection workers’ perceptions of influential factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Keddell, Emily & Hyslop, Ian, 2018. "Role type, risk perceptions and judgements in child welfare: A mixed methods vignette study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-139.
    11. King, Bryn & Black, Tara & Fallon, Barbara & Lung, Yu, 2021. "The role of risk in child welfare decision-making: A prospective cohort examination of families transferred to ongoing child protection services after an investigation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    12. King, Bryn & Parada, Henry & Fallon, Barbara & Escobar Olivo, Veronica & Best, Laura M. & Filippelli, Joanne, 2024. "Latin American children in Ontario child welfare: An examination of investigation disparities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Stephanie Lange & Claire-Marie Altrock & Emily Gossmann & Jörg M. Fegert & Andreas Jud, 2022. "COVID-19—What Price Do Children Pay? An Analysis of Economic and Social Policy Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Stritzel, Haley, 2022. "State-level changes in health insurance coverage and parental substance use-associated foster care entry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    15. Alberton, Amy M. & Angell, G. Brent & Gorey, Kevin M. & Grenier, Stéphane, 2020. "Homelessness among Indigenous peoples in Canada: The impacts of child welfare involvement and educational achievement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Weber, Sabine & Landolt, Markus A. & Maier, Thomas & Mohler-Kuo, Meichun & Schnyder, Ulrich & Jud, Andreas, 2017. "Psychotherapeutic care for sexually-victimized children – Do service providers meet the need? Multilevel analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 165-172.
    17. Maria Manuela Calheiros & Sandra Ornelas & Eunice Magalhães & Margarida Vaz Garrido, 2022. "Profiles of Young Children Involved with Child Protection Services in Portugal," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 933-958, June.
    18. Navarro-Pérez, José-Javier & Samper, Paula & Sancho, Patricia & Georgieva, Sylvia & Carbonell, Ángela & Mestre, Maria-Vicenta, 2023. "Development and content validation of a comprehensive tool for assessing risk and protective factors in children and adolescents: The ACRAM," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Smith, Maureen C., 2008. "Pre-professional mandated reporters' understanding of young children's eyewitness testimony: Implications for training," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 1355-1365, December.
    20. Keddell, Emily & Davie, Gabrielle & Barson, Dave, 2019. "Child protection inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: Social gradient and the ‘inverse intervention law’," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:169:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925000040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.