IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v74y2014icp142-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the maximum penalized likelihood approach for proportional hazard models with right censored survival data

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Jun
  • Heritier, Stephane
  • Lô, Serigne N.

Abstract

This paper considers simultaneous estimation of the regression coefficients and baseline hazard in proportional hazard models using the maximum penalized likelihood (MPL) method where a penalty function is used to smooth the baseline hazard estimate. Although MPL methods exist to fit proportional hazard models, they suffer from the following deficiencies: (i) the positivity constraint on the baseline hazard estimate is either avoided or poorly treated leading to efficiency loss, (ii) the asymptotic properties of the MPL estimator are lacking, and (iii) simulation studies comparing the performance of MPL to that of the partial likelihood have not been conducted. In this paper we propose a new approach and aim to address these issues. We first model baseline hazard using basis functions, then estimate this approximate baseline hazard and the regression coefficients simultaneously. The penalty function included in the likelihood is quite general but typically assumes prior knowledge about the smoothness of the baseline hazard. A new iterative optimization algorithm, which combines Newton’s method and a multiplicative iterative algorithm, is developed and its convergence properties studied. We show that if the smoothing parameter tends to zero sufficiently fast, the new estimator is consistent, asymptotically normal and retains full efficiency under independent censoring. A simulation study reveals that this method can be more efficient than the partial likelihood method, particularly for small to moderate samples. In addition, our simulation shows that the new estimator is substantially less biased under informative censoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Jun & Heritier, Stephane & Lô, Serigne N., 2014. "On the maximum penalized likelihood approach for proportional hazard models with right censored survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 142-156.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:74:y:2014:i:c:p:142-156
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2014.01.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947314000164
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2014.01.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Y. & Ruppert D., 2002. "Penalized Spline Estimation for Partially Linear Single-Index Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 1042-1054, December.
    2. Tianxi Cai & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2003. "Hazard Regression for Interval-Censored Data with Penalized Spline," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 570-579, September.
    3. Moustaki, Irini & Victoria-Feser, Maria-Pia, 2006. "Bounded-Influence Robust Estimation in Generalized Linear Latent Variable Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 644-653, June.
    4. Somnath Datta & Glen Satten & John Williamson, 2000. "Consistency and Asymptotic Normality of Estimators in a Proportional Hazards Model with Interval Censoring and Left Truncation," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 52(1), pages 160-172, March.
    5. Honore, Bo E. & Powell, James L., 1994. "Pairwise difference estimators of censored and truncated regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-2), pages 241-278.
    6. T. Cai & J. Huang & L. Tian, 2009. "Regularized Estimation for the Accelerated Failure Time Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 394-404, June.
    7. John Whitehead, 1980. "Fitting Cox's Regression Model to Survival Data Using Glim," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(3), pages 268-275, November.
    8. Kauermann, Goran, 2005. "Penalized spline smoothing in multivariable survival models with varying coefficients," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 169-186, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Cuiqing & Wang, Zhao & Zhao, Huimin, 2019. "A prediction-driven mixture cure model and its application in credit scoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 20-31.
    2. Mandal, B.N. & Ma, Jun, 2016. "l1 regularized multiplicative iterative path algorithm for non-negative generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 289-299.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabhashi W. Withana Gamage & Christopher S. McMahan & Lianming Wang, 2023. "A flexible parametric approach for analyzing arbitrarily censored data that are potentially subject to left truncation under the proportional hazards model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 188-212, January.
    2. Kauermann, Goran & Xu, Ronghui & Vaida, Florin, 2008. "Stacked Laplace-EM algorithm for duration models with time-varying and random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2514-2528, January.
    3. Zou, Yubo & Zhang, Jiajia & Qin, Guoyou, 2011. "A semiparametric accelerated failure time partial linear model and its application to breast cancer," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1479-1487, March.
    4. Jianhong Shi & Qian Yang & Xiongya Li & Weixing Song, 2017. "Effects of measurement error on a class of single-index varying coefficient regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 977-1001, September.
    5. Ichimura, Hidehiko & Todd, Petra E., 2007. "Implementing Nonparametric and Semiparametric Estimators," Handbook of Econometrics, in: J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 74, Elsevier.
    6. Khan, Shakeeb & Lewbel, Arthur, 2007. "Weighted And Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation Of Semiparametric Truncated Regression Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 309-347, April.
    7. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    8. Pierre Dubois & Bruno Jullien & Thierry Magnac, 2008. "Formal and Informal Risk Sharing in LDCs: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 679-725, July.
    9. Zhang, Xuelin, 2007. "Gender Differences in Quits and Absenteeism in Canada," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2007296e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    10. Timothy K.M. Beatty & Erling Røed Larsen, 2005. "Using Engel curves to estimate bias in the Canadian CPI as a cost of living index," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 482-499, May.
    11. Charlier, Erwin & Melenberg, Bertrand & van Soest, Arthur, 2000. "Estimation of a censored regression panel data model using conditional moment restrictions efficiently," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 25-56, March.
    12. Yanyuan Ma & Marc G. Genton, 2010. "Explicit estimating equations for semiparametric generalized linear latent variable models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 475-495, September.
    13. David Oakes, 2023. "Cox (1972): recollections and reflections," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 699-708, October.
    14. Cai, Jing-Heng & Song, Xin-Yuan & Lam, Kwok-Hap & Ip, Edward Hak-Sing, 2011. "A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2889-2907, November.
    15. Wang Zhu & Wang C.Y., 2010. "Buckley-James Boosting for Survival Analysis with High-Dimensional Biomarker Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-33, June.
    16. Lai, Peng & Wang, Qihua & Lian, Heng, 2012. "Bias-corrected GEE estimation and smooth-threshold GEE variable selection for single-index models with clustered data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 422-432.
    17. Alejandro Cid & Daniel Ferres & Máximo Rossi, 2008. "Subjective Well-Being in the Southern Cone: Health, Income and Family," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1308, Department of Economics - dECON.
    18. Jia Chen & Jiti Gao & Degui Li, 2013. "Estimation in Single-Index Panel Data Models with Heterogeneous Link Functions," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 928-955, November.
    19. repec:wyi:journl:002176 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ferraccioli, Federico & Sangalli, Laura M. & Finos, Livio, 2022. "Some first inferential tools for spatial regression with differential regularization," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    21. Pao-sheng Shen, 2013. "Regression analysis of interval censored and doubly truncated data with linear transformation models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 581-596, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:74:y:2014:i:c:p:142-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.