IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Binary trees for dissimilarity data

  • Piccarreta, Raffaella
Registered author(s):

    Binary segmentation procedures (in particular, classification and regression trees) are extended to study the relation between dissimilarity data and a set of explanatory variables. The proposed split criterion is very flexible, and can be applied to a wide range of data (e.g., mixed types of multiple responses, longitudinal data, sequence data). Also, it can be shown to be an extension of well-established criteria introduced in the literature on binary trees.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8V-4Y5BM8B-1/2/ba3eaa1712dd2341a2c790e568e6c46d
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

    Volume (Year): 54 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 6 (June)
    Pages: 1516-1524

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:6:p:1516-1524
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Duncan McVicar & Michael Anyadike-Danes, 2002. "Predicting successful and unsuccessful transitions from school to work by using sequence methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(2), pages 317-334.
    2. Henk Kiers & Donatella Vicari & Maurizio Vichi, 2005. "Simultaneous classification and multidimensional scaling with external information," Psychometrika, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 433-460, September.
    3. Siciliano, Roberta & Mola, Francesco, 2000. "Multivariate data analysis and modeling through classification and regression trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 32(3-4), pages 285-301, January.
    4. Briand, Bénédicte & Ducharme, Gilles R. & Parache, Vanessa & Mercat-Rommens, Catherine, 2009. "A similarity measure to assess the stability of classification trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1208-1217, February.
    5. Cees H. Elzinga, 2005. "Combinatorial Representations of Token Sequences," Journal of Classification, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 87-118, June.
    6. Sexton, Joseph & Laake, Petter, 2009. "Standard errors for bagged and random forest estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 801-811, January.
    7. Pierpaolo D’Urso, 2000. "Dissimilarity measures for time trajectories," Statistical Methods and Applications, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 53-83, January.
    8. Kim, Ji-Hyun, 2009. "Estimating classification error rate: Repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3735-3745, September.
    9. Raffaella Piccarreta & Francesco C. Billari, 2007. "Clustering work and family trajectories by using a divisive algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 1061-1078.
    10. Dine, Abdessamad & Larocque, Denis & Bellavance, François, 2009. "Multivariate trees for mixed outcomes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3795-3804, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:6:p:1516-1524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.