IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v172y2022ics0167947322000743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient algorithm to assess multivariate surrogate endpoints in a causal inference framework

Author

Listed:
  • Flórez, Alvaro J.
  • Molenberghs, Geert
  • Van der Elst, Wim
  • Alonso Abad, Ariel

Abstract

Multivariate surrogate endpoints can improve the efficiency of the drug development process, but their evaluation raises many challenges. Recently, the so-called individual causal association (ICA) has been introduced for validation purposes in the causal-inference paradigm. The ICA is a function of a partially identifiable correlation matrix (R) and, hence, it cannot be estimated without making untestable assumptions. This issue has been addressed via a simulation-based analysis. Essentially, the ICA is assessed across a set of values for the non-identifiable entries in R that lead to a valid correlation matrix and this has been implemented using a fast algorithm based on partial correlations (PC). Using theoretical arguments and simulations, it is shown that, in spite of its computational efficiency, the PC algorithm may lead to the spurious effect that adding non-informative surrogates, i.e., surrogates that convey no information on the treatment effect on the true endpoint, seemingly reduces the ICA range. To address this, a modified PC algorithm (MPC) is proposed. Based on simulations, it is shown that the MPC algorithm removes this nuisance effect and increases computational efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Flórez, Alvaro J. & Molenberghs, Geert & Van der Elst, Wim & Alonso Abad, Ariel, 2022. "An efficient algorithm to assess multivariate surrogate endpoints in a causal inference framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:172:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322000743
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2022.107494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947322000743
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2022.107494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewandowski, Daniel & Kurowicka, Dorota & Joe, Harry, 2009. "Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1989-2001, October.
    2. Joe, Harry, 2006. "Generating random correlation matrices based on partial correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 2177-2189, November.
    3. Ariel Alonso & Wim Van der Elst & Geert Molenberghs & Marc Buyse & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2015. "On the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the validation of surrogate endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 15-24, March.
    4. Kurowicka, Dorota, 2014. "Joint density of correlations in the correlation matrix with chordal sparsity patterns," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 160-170.
    5. Flórez, Alvaro Jóse & Alonso Abad, Ariel & Molenberghs, Geert & Van Der Elst, Wim, 2020. "Generating random correlation matrices with fixed values: An application to the evaluation of multivariate surrogate endpoints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Ariel Alonso & Annouschka Laenen & Geert Molenberghs & Helena Geys & Tony Vangeneugden, 2010. "A Unified Approach to Multi-item Reliability," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1061-1068, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forrester, Peter J. & Zhang, Jiyuan, 2020. "Parametrising correlation matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Hirofumi Michimae & Takeshi Emura, 2022. "Bayesian ridge estimators based on copula-based joint prior distributions for regression coefficients," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2741-2769, November.
    3. Madar, Vered, 2015. "Direct formulation to Cholesky decomposition of a general nonsingular correlation matrix," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 142-147.
    4. Soyeon Ahn & John M. Abbamonte, 2020. "A new approach for handling missing correlation values for meta‐analytic structural equation modeling: Corboundary R package," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    5. Davide Delle Monache & Ivan Petrella & Fabrizio Venditti, 2021. "Price Dividend Ratio and Long-Run Stock Returns: A Score-Driven State Space Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 1054-1065, October.
    6. Tuitman, Jan & Vanduffel, Steven & Yao, Jing, 2020. "Correlation matrices with average constraints," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Kurowicka, Dorota, 2014. "Joint density of correlations in the correlation matrix with chordal sparsity patterns," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 160-170.
    8. Benjamin Poignard & Jean-Davis Fermanian, 2014. "Dynamic Asset Correlations Based on Vines," Working Papers 2014-46, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    9. Durante Fabrizio & Puccetti Giovanni & Scherer Matthias & Vanduffel Steven, 2017. "The Vine Philosopher: An interview with Roger Cooke," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 256-267, December.
    10. Pourahmadi, Mohsen & Wang, Xiao, 2015. "Distribution of random correlation matrices: Hyperspherical parameterization of the Cholesky factor," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 5-12.
    11. Falk, Carl F. & Muthukrishna, Michael, 2021. "Parsimony in model selection: tools for assessing fit propensity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110856, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Erin E. Gabriel & Michael J. Daniels & M. Elizabeth Halloran, 2016. "Comparing biomarkers as trial level general surrogates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1046-1054, December.
    13. Zhang, Yixiao & Yu, Cindy L. & Li, Haitao, 2022. "Nowcasting GDP Using Dynamic Factor Model with Unknown Number of Factors and Stochastic Volatility: A Bayesian Approach," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 75-93.
    14. Brian Hartley, 2020. "Corridor stability of the Kaleckian growth model: a Markov-switching approach," Working Papers 2013, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2020.
    15. Alejandro Plastina & Sergio H. Lence & Ariel Ortiz‐Bobea, 2021. "How weather affects the decomposition of total factor productivity in U.S. agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(2), pages 215-234, March.
    16. Matthias Breuer & Harm H. Schütt, 2023. "Accounting for uncertainty: an application of Bayesian methods to accruals models," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 726-768, June.
    17. Steffen Liebscher & Thomas Kirschstein, 2015. "Efficiency of the pMST and RDELA location and scatter estimators," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 99(1), pages 63-82, January.
    18. Azamir, Bouchaib & Bennis, Driss & Michel, Bertrand, 2022. "A simplified algorithm for identifying abnormal changes in dynamic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    19. Giuseppe Brandi & Ruggero Gramatica & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2019. "Unveil stock correlation via a new tensor-based decomposition method," Papers 1911.06126, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    20. Andrew Y. Chen & Jack McCoy, 2022. "Missing Values Handling for Machine Learning Portfolios," Papers 2207.13071, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:172:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322000743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.