IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v115y2017icp155-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal scaling for survival analysis with ordinal data

Author

Listed:
  • Willems, S.J.W.
  • Fiocco, M.
  • Meulman, J.J.

Abstract

Medical and psychological studies often involve the collection and analysis of categorical data with nominal or ordinal category levels. Nominal categories have no ordering property, e.g. gender, with the two unordered covariates male and female. Ordinal category levels, however, have an ordering, e.g. when subjects are classified according to their education level, often categorized as low, medium or high education. When analyzing survival data, currently two methods can be chosen to include ordinal covariates in the Cox proportional hazard model. Dummy covariates can be used to indicate category memberships, as is usually done for nominal covariates. Estimated parameters for each category indicate the increase or decrease in risk of experiencing the event of interest compared to the reference category. Since these parameters are estimated independently from each other, the ordering property of the categories is lost in the process. To keep the ordinal property, integer values can be given to the covariate’s categories (e.g. low = 0, medium = 1, high = 2), and the variable is included in the model as a numeric covariate. However, since the ordinal data are now interpreted as numeric data, the property of equal distances between consecutive categories is introduced. This assumption is too strict for this data type; distances between consecutive categories do not necessarily have to be equal. A method is described to include ordinal data in the Cox model. The method implements optimal scaling to find optimal quantifications for the ordinal category levels. These quantifications are chosen such that they preserve the categories’ ordering, and do not force equal distances between consecutive category levels. A simulation study is carried out to compare the performance of optimal scaling with the performance of the two currently used methods described above. Results show that the optimal scaling method increases the model fit if ordinal covariates are included in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Willems, S.J.W. & Fiocco, M. & Meulman, J.J., 2017. "Optimal scaling for survival analysis with ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 155-171.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:115:y:2017:i:c:p:155-171
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2017.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947317301032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2017.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon, Noah & Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2011. "Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i05).
    2. Moeschberger M.L., 2003. "Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 248-249, January.
    3. J. Kruskal, 1964. "Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 115-129, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Louis Forestal & Shih-Ming Pi, 2021. "Using Artificial Neural networks and Optimal Scaling Model to Forecast Agriculture Commodity Price: An Ecological-economic Approach," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 1-3.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beniaich, Adnane & Guimarães, Danielle Vieira & Avanzi, Junior Cesar & Silva, Bruno Montoani & Acuña-Guzman, Salvador Francisco & dos Santos, Wharley Pereira & Silva, Marx Leandro Naves, 2023. "Spontaneous vegetation as an alternative to cover crops in olive orchards reduces water erosion and improves soil physical properties under tropical conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Giuseppe Arbia & Giovanni Lafratta, 2002. "Anisotropic spatial sampling designs for urban pollution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 51(2), pages 223-234, May.
    3. Samuel Shye, 2010. "The Motivation to Volunteer: A Systemic Quality of Life Theory," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 98(2), pages 183-200, September.
    4. Soave, David & Lawless, Jerald F., 2023. "Regularized regression for two phase failure time studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    6. la Grange, Anthony & le Roux, Niël & Gardner-Lubbe, Sugnet, 2009. "BiplotGUI: Interactive Biplots in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i12).
    7. Zemin Zheng & Jie Zhang & Yang Li, 2022. "L 0 -Regularized Learning for High-Dimensional Additive Hazards Regression," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2762-2775, September.
    8. Simon Bussy & Mokhtar Z. Alaya & Anne‐Sophie Jannot & Agathe Guilloux, 2022. "Binacox: automatic cut‐point detection in high‐dimensional Cox model with applications in genetics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1414-1426, December.
    9. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    10. Silvia Vilčeková & Ilija Zoran Apostoloski & Ľudmila Mečiarová & Eva Krídlová Burdová & Jozef Kiseľák, 2017. "Investigation of Indoor Air Quality in Houses of Macedonia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Biagini, Francesca & Groll, Andreas & Widenmann, Jan, 2013. "Intensity-based premium evaluation for unemployment insurance products," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 302-316.
    12. Benedicte Sjo Tislevoll & Monica Hellesøy & Oda Helen Eck Fagerholt & Stein-Erik Gullaksen & Aashish Srivastava & Even Birkeland & Dimitrios Kleftogiannis & Pilar Ayuda-Durán & Laure Piechaczyk & Dagi, 2023. "Early response evaluation by single cell signaling profiling in acute myeloid leukemia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Funk, Patrick & Davis, Alex & Vaishnav, Parth & Dewitt, Barry & Fuchs, Erica, 2020. "Individual inconsistency and aggregate rationality: Overcoming inconsistencies in expert judgment at the technical frontier," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "A High Frequency Trade Execution Model for Supervised Learning," Papers 1710.03870, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    15. Leandro C. Hermida & E. Michael Gertz & Eytan Ruppin, 2022. "Predicting cancer prognosis and drug response from the tumor microbiome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Moris Triventi, 2014. "Higher education regimes: an empirical classification of higher education systems and its relationship with student accessibility," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1685-1703, May.
    17. Jessica Dafflon & Pedro F. Da Costa & František Váša & Ricardo Pio Monti & Danilo Bzdok & Peter J. Hellyer & Federico Turkheimer & Jonathan Smallwood & Emily Jones & Robert Leech, 2022. "A guided multiverse study of neuroimaging analyses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Karim Abou-Moustafa & Frank P. Ferrie, 2018. "Local generalized quadratic distance metrics: application to the k-nearest neighbors classifier," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(2), pages 341-363, June.
    19. Camacho, Maximo & Perez-Quiros, Gabriel & Saiz, Lorena, 2006. "Are European business cycles close enough to be just one?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(9-10), pages 1687-1706.
    20. Takumi Saegusa & Tianzhou Ma & Gang Li & Ying Qing Chen & Mei-Ling Ting Lee, 2020. "Variable Selection in Threshold Regression Model with Applications to HIV Drug Adherence Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 376-398, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:115:y:2017:i:c:p:155-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.