IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v113y2017icp64-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-controlled case series with multiple event types

Author

Listed:
  • Ghebremichael-Weldeselassie, Yonas
  • Whitaker, Heather J.
  • Douglas, Ian J.
  • Smeeth, Liam
  • Farrington, C. Paddy

Abstract

Self-controlled case series methods for events that may be classified as one of several types are described. When the event is non-recurrent, the different types correspond to competing risks. It is shown that, under circumstances that are likely to arise in practical applications, the SCCS multi-type likelihood reduces to the product of the type-specific likelihoods. For recurrent events, this applies whether or not the marginal type-specific counts are dependent. As for the standard SCCS method, a rare disease assumption is required for non-recurrent events. Several forms of this assumption are investigated by simulation. The methods are applied to data on MMR vaccine and convulsions (febrile and non-febrile), and to data on thiazolidinediones and fractures (at different sites).

Suggested Citation

  • Ghebremichael-Weldeselassie, Yonas & Whitaker, Heather J. & Douglas, Ian J. & Smeeth, Liam & Farrington, C. Paddy, 2017. "Self-controlled case series with multiple event types," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 64-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:113:y:2017:i:c:p:64-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947316302377
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Rabe-Hesketh & A. Skrondal & H. K. Gjessing, 2008. "Biometrical Modeling of Twin and Family Data Using Standard Mixed Model Software," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 280-288, March.
    2. Shawn E. Simpson, 2013. "A Positive Event Dependence Model for Self-Controlled Case Series with Applications in Postmarketing Surveillance," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 128-136, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheti Nicoletti & Birgitta Rabe, 2013. "Inequality in Pupils' Test Scores: How Much do Family, Sibling Type and Neighbourhood Matter?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 80(318), pages 197-218, April.
    2. Vladasel, Theodor & Lindquist, Matthew J. & Sol, Joeri & van Praag, Mirjam, 2021. "On the origins of entrepreneurship: Evidence from sibling correlations," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    3. Rui Feng & Gongfu Zhou & Meizhuo Zhang & Heping Zhang, 2009. "Analysis of Twin Data Using SAS," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 584-589, June.
    4. Owen, Gwilym & Jones, Kelvyn & Harris, Richard, 2017. "Does neighbourhood deprivation affect the genetic influence on body mass?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 38-45.
    5. Volker Lang, 2017. "Twin data analysis with ACE-decomposed explanatory variables using Stata," German Stata Users' Group Meetings 2017 06, Stata Users Group.
    6. Steven F. Lehrer & Weili Ding, 2017. "Are genetic markers of interest for economic research?," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Luca Crivelli & Mario Lucchini, 2017. "Health and happiness: an introduction," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 64(2), pages 105-111, June.
    8. Xueqin Wang & Xiaobo Guo & Mingguang He & Heping Zhang, 2011. "Statistical Inference in Mixed Models and Analysis of Twin and Family Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 987-995, September.
    9. Patel, Pankaj C. & Wolfe, Marcus T. & Williams, Trenton A., 2019. "Self-employment and allostatic load," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 731-751.
    10. Hübler, Philipp, 2017. "Heritability of time preference: Evidence from German twin data," MPRA Paper 77620, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Diana, Tony, 2018. "An evaluation of the impact of wake vortex re-categorization: The case of Charlotte Douglas International airport (CLT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 41-49.
    12. Philipp Huebler, 2017. "Heritability of time preference: Evidence from German twin data," Discussion Paper Series 334, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics.
    13. George L. Wehby & Dan Shane, 2019. "Genetic variation in health insurance coverage," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 301-316, December.
    14. Jason D Boardman & Michael E Roettger & Benjamin W Domingue & Matthew B McQueen & Brett C Haberstick & Kathleen Mullan Harris, 2012. "Gene–environment interactions related to body mass: School policies and social context as environmental moderators," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 24(3), pages 370-388, July.
    15. Peter K. Hatemi & John R. Hibbing & Sarah E. Medland & Matthew C. Keller & John R. Alford & Kevin B. Smith & Nicholas G. Martin & Lindon J. Eaves, 2010. "Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Family Design to Investigate Genetic Influence on Political Beliefs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 798-814, July.
    16. Rabe, Birgitta & Nicoletti, Cheti, 2010. "Inequality in pupils’ educational attainment: how much do family, sibling type and neighbourhood matter?," ISER Working Paper Series 2010-26, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    17. Kettlewell, Nathan & Tymula, Agnieszka, 2021. "The Heritability of Trust and Trustworthiness Depends on the Measure of Trust," IZA Discussion Papers 14734, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:113:y:2017:i:c:p:64-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.