IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v21y2010i8p647-654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradox, accounting values, and intelligible regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur, Alex

Abstract

Expected utility theory, which includes estimating the probabilities of uncertain future outcomes, is the classical model for rational economic decision making, and, by implication, rational valuation and financial reporting regulation. In Wittgensteinian terms it is a ‘hinge’ of the language game in which these practices are embedded. When rendered explicit, however, this ‘hinge’ appears to be formally incoherent. The exploration of this problem has consequences for all of our arguments over the epistemological underpinnings of accounting reports – whether realist, representational, constructivist, or otherwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur, Alex, 2010. "Paradox, accounting values, and intelligible regulation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 647-654.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:21:y:2010:i:8:p:647-654
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104523541000136X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Arthur, 2009. "Principles and rules: the open question argument and normative imperatives," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 313-326.
    2. Tinker, Tony, 1991. "The accountant as partisan," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 297-310.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Eagle & Andrew, Jane, 2016. "Rethinking China: Discourse, convergence and fair value accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-21.
    2. Hayoun, Shaul, 2019. "How fair value is both market-based and entity-specific: The irreducibility of value constellations to market prices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-82.
    3. Neu, D. & Warsame, H. & Pedwell, K., 1998. "Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 265-282, April.
    4. Baker, C. Richard & Wallage, Philip, 2000. "The Future of Financial Reporting in Europe: Its Role in Corporate Governance," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 173-187, July.
    5. Graham, Cameron, 2008. "Fearful asymmetry: The consumption of accounting signs in the Algoma Steel pension bailout," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 756-782.
    6. Himick, Darlene & Brivot, Marion & Henri, Jean-François, 2016. "An ethical perspective on accounting standard setting: Professional and lay-experts’ contribution to GASB’s Pension Project," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 22-38.
    7. Chabrak, Nihel & Craig, Russell, 2013. "Student imaginings, cognitive dissonance and critical thinking," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 91-104.
    8. Bayou, Mohamed E. & Reinstein, Alan & Williams, Paul F., 2011. "To tell the truth: A discussion of issues concerning truth and ethics in accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-124, February.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6742 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Boyce, Gordon, 2008. "The social relevance of ethics education in a global(ising) era: From individual dilemmas to systemic crises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 255-290.
    11. C. Richard Baker, 2009. "From Member of the Company to Registered Auditor: The Role of the External Auditor in Corporate Governance," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(1), pages 24-32, March.
    12. Power, Michael, 2021. "The financial reporting system - what is it?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110220, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Roberts, John & Wang, Timothy, 2019. "Faithful representation as an ‘objective mirage’: A Saussurean analysis of accounting and its participation in the financial crisis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Shapiro, B. P., 1998. "Toward a normative model of rational argumentation for critical accounting discussions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 641-663, October.
    15. David J. Cooper, 1994. "La recherche sur la formation en comptabilité: élargir l'horizon," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(S1), pages 189-206, December.
    16. Brown, Judy, 2009. "Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 313-342.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3828 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mouck, Tom, 2004. "Institutional reality, financial reporting and the rules of the game," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(5-6), pages 525-541.
    19. Kamla, Rania, 2015. "Critical Muslim intellectuals’ thought: Possible contributions to the development of emancipatory accounting thought," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 64-74.
    20. David J. Cooper, 1994. "Expanding the Horizons of Research on Accounting Education," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(S1), pages 163-177, December.
    21. Elad, Charles & Shah, Neeta & Agyeman, Charles, 2023. "Accounting classification in the era of International Financial Reporting Standards: The case of Africa," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    22. Lyndie Bayne & Juliana Ng & Marvin Wee, 2022. "Supply chain disclosure: stakeholder preferences versus current practice in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3875-3911, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:21:y:2010:i:8:p:647-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.