IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v19y2008i6p915-919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seeking the relevance of interpretive research: A contribution to the polyphonic debate

Author

Listed:
  • Scapens, Robert W.

Abstract

This contribution to the polyphonic debate agrees with the authors about the importance of making interpretative accounting research more relevant. It argues that the ways of seeking relevance could, however, be very diverse; with some researchers seeking to intervene in individual organisations through interventionist research, while others might be more concerned to draw out the social and political consequences of accounting in modern organisations. For the researchers who seek to intervene in practice, it will be important to combine the theoretical knowledge of accounting researchers with the craft knowledge of accounting practitioners. Nevertheless, for such research to be publishable in international research journals it must continue to be firmly grounded in theoretical understandings and also seek to extend existing theoretical knowledge, as well as raising practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Scapens, Robert W., 2008. "Seeking the relevance of interpretive research: A contribution to the polyphonic debate," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 915-919.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:915-919
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235407000457
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.02.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jönsson, Sten & Lukka, Kari, 2005. "Doing interventionist research in management accounting," GRI-rapport 2005:6, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI.
    2. Trevor Hopper & Andrew Powell, 1985. "Making Sense Of Research Into The Organizational And Social Aspects Of Management Accounting: A Review Of Its Underlying Assumptions [1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 429-465, September.
    3. Arnold, P. J., 1998. "The limits of postmodernism in accounting history: The Decatur experience," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 665-684, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas McGuigan, 2015. "The Impact of Journal Rankings on Australasian Accounting Education Scholarship - A Personal View," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 187-207, June.
    2. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni & Antonio Chirico, 2022. "The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five‐dimensional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3216-3230, November.
    3. Vicki Baard, 2010. "A critical review of interventionist research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 13-45, April.
    4. Kym Fraser & Benedict Sheehy, 2020. "Abundant Publications but Minuscule Impact: The Irrelevance of Academic Accounting Research on Practice and the Profession," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-36, October.
    5. Parker, Lee D., 2012. "Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 54-70.
    6. Lee D. Parker & James Guthrie & Simon Linacre, 2011. "The relationship between academic accounting research and professional practice," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 5-14, January.
    7. Alberto Quagli & Francesco Avallone & Paola Ramassa, 2016. "The Real Impact Factor and the Gap between Accounting Research and Practice," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 29-57.
    8. Duff, Angus & Marriott, Neil, 2017. "The teaching-research gestalt in accounting: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 413-428.
    9. Tucker, Basil P. & Lawson, Raef, 2020. "EMBAs perceived usefulness of academic research for student learning and use in practice," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    10. Sylvain Durocher, 2009. "The future of interpretive accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 137-159, July.
    11. Deryl Northcott & Simon Linacre, 2010. "Producing Spaces for Academic Discourse: The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises and Journal Quality Rankings," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(1), pages 38-54, March.
    12. Vicki C. Baard & John Dumay, 2020. "Interventionist research in accounting: reflections on the good, the bad and the ugly," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 1979-2006, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Modell, Sven, 2017. "Critical realist accounting research: In search of its emancipatory potential," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 20-35.
    2. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    3. Helen Irvine & Michael Gaffikin, 2006. "Getting in, getting on and getting out: reflections on a qualitative research project," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 115-145, January.
    4. Mohammad Hudaib & Roszaini Haniffa, 2009. "Exploring auditor independence: an interpretive approach," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 221-246, January.
    5. Karen Maas & Kellie Liket, 2011. "Talk the Walk: Measuring the Impact of Strategic Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 445-464, May.
    6. Matthew Egan, 2015. "Driving Water Management Change Where Economic Incentive is Limited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 73-90, November.
    7. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "Apports De L'Ethnicite A La Culture En Sciences De Gestion," Post-Print hal-00676555, HAL.
    8. Yara Consuelo Cintra & Jim Haslam & Fernanda Filgueiras Sauerbronn, 2022. "Developing Appreciation of Emancipatory Accounting through Empirical Research: Issues of Method," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(sup2022), pages 210009-2100.
    9. Hammond, Theresa & Clayton, Bruce M. & Arnold, Patricia J., 2012. "An “unofficial” history of race relations in the South African accounting industry, 1968–2000: Perspectives of South Africa's first black chartered accountants," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 332-350.
    10. Ali M. Elharidy & Brian Nicholson & Robert W. Scapens, 2008. "Using grounded theory in interpretive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 139-155, June.
    11. Baxter, Jane & Chua, Wai Fong, 2003. "Alternative management accounting research--whence and whither," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 97-126.
    12. Laurent Cappelletti, 2010. "La Recherche-Intervention : Quels Usages En Controle De Gestion ?," Post-Print hal-00481090, HAL.
    13. Shamsi S. Bawaneh, 2012. "A prescription for developing countries to avoid chaos: A tolerant view," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 2(6), pages 85-90, November.
    14. Laurent Cappelletti & Nicolas Dufourg, 2016. "Solvabilité II, quels apports pour la gouvernance des risques ? Résultats d'une recherche-intervention au sein d'une mutuelle française," Post-Print hal-01901188, HAL.
    15. Kakkuri-Knuuttila, Marja-Liisa & Lukka, Kari & Kuorikoski, Jaakko, 2008. "Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 267-291.
    16. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Bhimani, Alnoor, 1999. "Mapping methodological frontiers in cross-national management control research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(5-6), pages 413-440, July.
    18. Emmanuel Abeka & Felix A. Asante & Wolfram Laube & Samuel N. A. Codjoe, 2020. "Contested causes of flooding in poor urban areas in Accra, Ghana: an actor-oriented perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3033-3049, April.
    19. Jansen, E. Pieter, 2002. "The use of performance information case studies in local social services departments," Research Report 02A19, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Ferguson, John & Collison, David & Power, David & Stevenson, Lorna, 2009. "Constructing meaning in the service of power: An analysis of the typical modes of ideology in accounting textbooks," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 896-909.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:915-919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.