IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v202y2026ip2s0960077925015942.html

Hierarchical synchronization and distortion scaling in social media networks: A fractal-like topology theory

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Kaiming

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of social media as a dominant channel for information dissemination has intensified concerns over systemic information distortion—whereby content is progressively altered through successive layers of transmission. While prior studies have explored such distortion qualitatively, the quantitative interplay between propagation topology and stochastic cognitive perturbations remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we propose a novel fractal-inspired directed hierarchical network (DHN) model to capture the structural patterns of propagation, and introduce a Noise-Frustrated Hegselmann–Krause (NFHK) framework to model opinion dynamics under noise. Analytical results, supported by group and graph theory, reveal that noise accumulation leads to increasing opinion distortion and the emergence of intra-layer synchronization. Multi-agent simulations confirm these effects, showing that noise intensity shapes both convergence rates and weak intra-layer clustering. Empirical validation using a representative retweet cascade demonstrates that the proposed model reproduces real-world distortion patterns and synchronization behaviors, even without direct links. This work uncovers a unified mechanism for information distortion in digital platforms and offers topology-aware insights for public opinion governance and platform regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Kaiming, 2026. "Hierarchical synchronization and distortion scaling in social media networks: A fractal-like topology theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 202(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:202:y:2026:i:p2:s0960077925015942
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925015942
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Hegselmann & Ulrich Krause, 2002. "Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis and Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5(3), pages 1-2.
    2. Hashemi, Parisa & Nazarimehr, Fahimeh & Parastesh, Fatemeh & Towhidkhah, Farzad & Jafari, Sajad, 2025. "Inter-layer coupling effects on synchronization in multiplex neuronal networks with different topologies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1).
    3. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    5. Luo, Kaiming & Cai, Zongkai & Liu, Zonghua & Guan, Shuguang & Zou, Yong, 2024. "Effects of uncommon non-isochronicities on remote synchronization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Zhang, Jiangbo & Hong, Yiguang, 2013. "Opinion evolution analysis for short-range and long-range Deffuant–Weisbuch models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(21), pages 5289-5297.
    7. Sushil Bikhchandani & David Hirshleifer & Omer Tamuz & Ivo Welch, 2024. "Information Cascades and Social Learning," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(3), pages 1040-1093, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Diefeng & Rao, Yulei & Sun, Xianming & Xiao, Erte, 2025. "Optional disclosure and observational learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Lin Peng & Linyi Zhang, 2025. "Unleashing the Crowd: The Effect of Social Networks in Crowdfunding Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4942-4976, June.
    3. Yasuko Kawahata, 2024. "Entanglement: Balancing Punishment and Compensation, Repeated Dilemma Game-Theoretic Analysis of Maximum Compensation Problem for Bypass and Least Cost Paths in Fact-Checking, Case of Fake News with Weak Wallace's Law," Papers 2403.02342, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    4. Yasuko Kawahata, 2024. "Repetitive Dilemma Games in Distribution Information Using Interplay of Droop Quota: Meek's Method in Impact of Maximum Compensation and Minimum Cost Routes in Information Role of Marginal Contribution in Two-Sided Matching Markets," Papers 2403.18837, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    5. Toby Pilditch & Jens Koed Madsen, 2021. "Targeting Your Preferences: Modelling Micro-Targeting for an Increasingly Diverse Electorate," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(1), pages 1-5.
    6. Julia Cage & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2017. "The Production of Information in an Online World: Is Copy Right?," Working Papers hal-03393171, HAL.
    7. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    8. Tetsuro Kobayashi & Fumiaki Taka & Takahisa Suzuki, 2021. "Can “Googling” correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    10. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.
    11. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Fathey Mohammed & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Yousef Fazea, 2023. "The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Michele Cantarella & Nicolo' Fraccaroli & Roberto Volpe, 2019. "Does fake news affect voting behaviour?," Department of Economics 0146, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    14. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business journalism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Barrera, Oscar & Guriev, Sergei & Henry, Emeric & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, 2020. "Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Luca Braghieri & Ro'ee Levy & Hannah Trachtman, 2025. "Frictions in News Consumption: How to Improve the Social Media News Diet," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 12-16, October.
    18. Sumeet Kumar & Binxuan Huang & Ramon Alfonso Villa Cox & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "An anatomical comparison of fake-news and trusted-news sharing pattern on Twitter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 109-133, June.
    19. Julia Cagé & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2020. "The Production of Information in an Online World," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 87(5), pages 2126-2164.
    20. Mignot Sarah & Pellizzari Paolo & Westerhoff Frank, 2024. "Fake News and Asset Price Dynamics," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 244(4), pages 351-379.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:202:y:2026:i:p2:s0960077925015942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.