IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v143y2021ics0960077920309498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty quantification in game theory

Author

Listed:
  • de Cursi, Eduardo Souza

Abstract

This work examines the applicability of Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in Game Theory. We consider the classical games “matching pennies” and “Hawk an Dove” in situations involving uncertainty. The first game examined is “matching pennies”: a first situation concerns the game where the probabilities of choice between Heads and Tails are unknown and must be determined from observations. A second situation concerns fluctuations in the implementation of the Nash equilibrium. Instability is evidentiated and a strategy based on statistical estimation is introduced. A third situation considers random payoffs having an unknown distribution: observations are used to generate an UQ representation of the real distribution of the payoffs, without any supplementary assumption on the nature of the distribution. Finally, we analyze the effects of uncertainties on the associated replicator dynamics: UQ is applied to generate mean trajectories and mean orbits - in this step, we need to manipulate statistics of curves, which are objects defined by functions, belonging to infinitely dimensional vector spaces. The second game is “Hawk and Dove”. We examine the situation where the reward and the cost of an injury are both uncertain and only a small sample of values is available. The methods of UQ are applied to determine the mean evolution of the system and confidence intervals for the evolution of the fractions of Hawks and Doves. The UQ methods involved are described and simple examples are given to facilitate understanding and application to other situations.

Suggested Citation

  • de Cursi, Eduardo Souza, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification in game theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:143:y:2021:i:c:s0960077920309498
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077920309498
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Space-partition method for the variance-based sensitivity analysis: Optimal partition scheme and comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-82.
    4. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Yunyang & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2022. "Consistency regularization-based deep polynomial chaos neural network method for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    5. Iftikhar Ahmad & Ahsan Ayub & Uzair Ibrahim & Mansoor Khan Khattak & Manabu Kano, 2018. "Data-Based Sensing and Stochastic Analysis of Biodiesel Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Shengwen Yin & Keliang Jin & Yu Bai & Wei Zhou & Zhonggang Wang, 2023. "Solution-Space-Reduction-Based Evidence Theory Method for Stiffness Evaluation of Air Springs with Epistemic Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Rehme, Michael F. & Franzelin, Fabian & Pflüger, Dirk, 2021. "B-splines on sparse grids for surrogates in uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Luca Di Persio & Michele Bonollo & Gregorio Pellegrini, 2015. "A computational spectral approach to interest rate models," Papers 1508.06236, arXiv.org.
    9. Kröker, Ilja & Oladyshkin, Sergey, 2022. "Arbitrary multi-resolution multi-wavelet-based polynomial chaos expansion for data-driven uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Abgrall, R. & Congedo, P.M. & Geraci, G., 2017. "Towards a unified multiresolution scheme for treating discontinuities in differential equations with uncertainties," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-22.
    11. Lim, HyeongUk & Manuel, Lance, 2021. "Distribution-free polynomial chaos expansion surrogate models for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Lin, Y.-T. & Shih, Y.-T. & Chien, C.-S. & Sheng, Q., 2021. "A note on stochastic polynomial chaos expansions for uncertain volatility and Asian option pricing," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    13. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    14. Guan, Xuefei, 2024. "Sparse moment quadrature for uncertainty modeling and quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. J. Yang & B. Faverjon & D. Dureisseix & P. Swider & S. Marburg & H. Peters & N. Kessissoglou, 2016. "Prediction of the intramembranous tissue formation during perisprosthetic healing with uncertainties. Part 2. Global clinical healing due to combination of random sources," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(13), pages 1387-1394, October.
    16. Papi, Francesco & Balduzzi, Francesco & Ferrara, Giovanni & Bianchini, Alessandro, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification on the effects of rain-induced erosion on annual energy production and performance of a Multi-MW wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 701-715.
    17. Olivares, Alberto & Staffetti, Ernesto, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification of a mathematical model of COVID-19 transmission dynamics with mass vaccination strategy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Jiang, Chen & Vega, Manuel A. & Todd, Michael D. & Hu, Zhen, 2022. "Model correction and updating of a stochastic degradation model for failure prognostics of miter gates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    19. Zan Wang & Mitchell J. Small, 2016. "Statistical performance of CO 2 leakage detection using seismic travel time measurements," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 55-69, February.
    20. Cheng, Hongzhi & Zhou, Chuangxin & Lu, Xingen & Zhao, Shengfeng & Han, Ge & Yang, Chengwu, 2023. "Robust aerodynamic optimization and design exploration of a wide-chord transonic fan under geometric and operational uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:143:y:2021:i:c:s0960077920309498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.