IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v388y2025ics0306261925003952.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep, hot and contested: Assembling the geothermal rush in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Spijkerboer, Rozanne C.
  • Turhan, Ethemcan

Abstract

Governments around the world emphasize the importance of further development and support for geothermal energy to meet decarbonization targets. However, there appears to be a tension between the discourses surrounding geothermal energy as a renewable resource, and the practice of deploying geothermal energy in a sustainable manner on the ground. In this paper, we use assemblage thinking to explore the plural material, social and political tensions surrounding geothermal energy in Turkey, to provide insights on the promises, pitfalls and spatialization of geothermal energy as part of a just and inclusive decarbonization strategy. Turkey experienced massive growth in the exploitation of its geothermal resources for electricity generation in the past decade. Using Q-methodology, a mixed method approach that combines factor analysis and qualitative data, this paper explores the plurality of discourses among a variety of stakeholders involved in or affected by geothermal energy development in the country. Based on the results, four distinct discourses were identified, three of which represent the diverse discourses among proponents of geothermal energy, while the remaining one represents discontent with geothermal expansion. Each of these discourses hints at energy injustices in the development of geothermal energy. Our results show that geothermal proponents are mainly concerned with procedural justice and distributional justice and focus primarily on the pursuit of ‘net justice’. Opponents, on the other hand, mainly struggle against injustices related to severe misrecognition of the land and the people who depend on this land. A focus on increasing social acceptance without broader energy justice considerations runs the risk of creating tools that ‘manufacture consent’, instead of a system that enables the sustainable development of geothermal resources in a just, fair, and societally acceptable manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Spijkerboer, Rozanne C. & Turhan, Ethemcan, 2025. "Deep, hot and contested: Assembling the geothermal rush in Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:388:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925003952
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925003952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roos, Andreas, 2024. "Renewing the Subterranean Energy Regime? How Petroculture Obscures the Materiality of Deep Geothermal Energy Technology in Sweden," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Shortall, Ruth & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Axelsson, Guðni, 2015. "Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 391-406.
    3. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Dworkin, Michael H., 2015. "Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 435-444.
    4. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Alian Fini, Mehdi & Gharapetian, Derrick & Nathwani, Jatin & Dusseault, Maurice B., 2022. "A review of nanotechnology fluid applications in geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Gavin Bridge & Ludger Gailing, 2020. "New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1037-1050, September.
    6. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Burke, Matthew & Baker, Lucy & Kotikalapudi, Chaitanya Kumar & Wlokas, Holle, 2017. "New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 677-691.
    7. David Bidwell & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2023. "Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 317-320, April.
    8. Sneegas, Gretchen & Beckner, Sydney & Brannstrom, Christian & Jepson, Wendy & Lee, Kyungsun & Seghezzo, Lucas, 2021. "Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Seona & Yun, Sun-Jin & Cho, Kongjang, 2024. "Energy justice: Lessons from offshore wind farm siting conflicts in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Van Uffelen, N. & Taebi, B. & Pesch, Udo, 2024. "Revisiting the energy justice framework: Doing justice to normative uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    3. Shan Zhou & Douglas S. Noonan, 2019. "Justice Implications of Clean Energy Policies and Programs in the United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Poncian, Japhace & Jose, Jim, 2019. "National resource ownership and community engagement in Tanzania's natural gas governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Chen, Chien-fei & Nelson, Hannah & Xu, Xiaojing & Bonilla, Gregory & Jones, Nicholas, 2021. "Beyond technology adoption: Examining home energy management systems, energy burdens and climate change perceptions during COVID-19 pandemic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Merel Noorman & Brenda Espinosa Apráez & Saskia Lavrijssen, 2023. "AI and Energy Justice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Robert Lindner, 2023. "Green hydrogen partnerships with the Global South. Advancing an energy justice perspective on “tomorrow's oil”," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1038-1053, April.
    8. Inseok Seo & Youhyun Lee, 2024. "Identifying typologies of synthetic energy justice: Eco-centric and anthropocentric perspectives," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(6), pages 3297-3315, September.
    9. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H., 2019. "The trilemma of waste-to-energy: A multi-purpose solution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 636-645.
    10. Bartiaux, Françoise & Vandeschrick, Christophe & Moezzi, Mithra & Frogneux, Nathalie, 2018. "Energy justice, unequal access to affordable warmth, and capability deprivation: A quantitative analysis for Belgium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1219-1233.
    11. Jayapalan, C. & Ganesh, L.S., 2019. "Environmentalists and their conflicts with Energy Justice – Concept of “Power-Environ” in the Athirappilly HEPP in Kerala," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 215-229.
    12. Healy, Noel & Barry, John, 2017. "Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 451-459.
    13. Hiteva, Ralitsa & Sovacool, Benjamin, 2017. "Harnessing social innovation for energy justice: A business model perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 631-639.
    14. Alford-Jones, Kelsey, 2022. "How injustice can lead to energy policy failure: A case study from Guatemala," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Franziska Müller & Manuel Neumann & Carsten Elsner & Simone Claar, 2021. "Assessing African Energy Transitions: Renewable Energy Policies, Energy Justice, and SDG 7," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 119-130.
    16. David Horan, 2019. "A New Approach to Partnerships for SDG Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Ofori, Pamela E. & Ofori, Isaac K., 2024. "The Impact of Frontier Technology Adoption on Gender Inequality: Evidence from Africa," MPRA Paper 121245, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Lonergan, Katherine Emma & Suter, Nicolas & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2023. "Energy systems modelling for just transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Dong, Kangyin & Yang, Senmiao & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Xiucheng, 2023. "Revisiting energy justice: Is renewable energy technology innovation a tool for realizing a just energy system?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Cardoso, Andrea & Turhan, Ethemcan, 2018. "Examining new geographies of coal: Dissenting energyscapes in Colombia and Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 398-408.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:388:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925003952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.