IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v343y2023ics0306261923005962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shape parameters optimisation of a quayside heaving rectangular wave energy converter

Author

Listed:
  • Tournant, Paul
  • Perret, Gaële
  • Smaoui, Hassan
  • Sergent, Philippe
  • Marin, François

Abstract

In order to increase the competitiveness of wave energy industry, device’s efficiency and cost have to be both optimised. This study is a contribution to this approach by presenting the optimisation of a quayside rectangular float. This configuration has been chosen since quayside systems present the advantage of greatly reducing maintenance and grid connection costs. Moreover, rectangular shapes enable us to validate the optimisation algorithm with a linear potential model. Thus, the evolutionary algorithm CMA-ES (Covariance Matrix Adaptation-Evolutionary Strategy) is used to perform Capture Width (CW) optimisations in regular and irregular waves. Results with and without a vertical wall are compared. In an open sea configuration, at a given frequency, the shape that maximises efficiency is a horizontal flat rectangle with a minimum draft and a breadth equals to a half wavelength. The presence of the wall doubles the CW compared to the case in open sea. Moreover, for a quayside case, one optimal shape for a given draft has a breadth twice smaller than the open sea case. In addition, the resonances of the water column in the gap between the float and the dike, that occur in regular waves, lead to various possible optimised shapes. However, only the shape corresponding to a minimum draft and a quarter of the wavelength wide is also recovered in irregular waves. This shape also appears to be less dependent to the clearance distance between the float and the vertical wall. Finally, bi-objective optimisation results are realised in irregular waves for a rectangular quayside float in order to maximise the CW and minimise the WEC (Wave Energy Converter) cost. A significant cost reduction is possible by reducing the float immersed surface and volume. It is shown that a reduction of the float’s breadth of 50% from the optimal value only reduces the CW of about 7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Tournant, Paul & Perret, Gaële & Smaoui, Hassan & Sergent, Philippe & Marin, François, 2023. "Shape parameters optimisation of a quayside heaving rectangular wave energy converter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:343:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923005962
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923005962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Michailides, Constantine & Lavidas, George & Chatjigeorgiou, Ioannis K., 2021. "Layout optimization of heaving Wave Energy Converters linear arrays in front of a vertical wall," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 189-203.
    2. Zhang, Hengming & Zhou, Binzhen & Vogel, Christopher & Willden, Richard & Zang, Jun & Geng, Jing, 2020. "Hydrodynamic performance of a dual-floater hybrid system combining a floating breakwater and an oscillating-buoy type wave energy converter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Chandrasekaran, Srinivasan & Sricharan, V.V.S., 2020. "Numerical analysis of a new multi-body floating wave energy converter with a linear power take-off system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 250-271.
    4. McCabe, A.P., 2013. "Constrained optimization of the shape of a wave energy collector by genetic algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 274-284.
    5. Babarit, A. & Hals, J. & Muliawan, M.J. & Kurniawan, A. & Moan, T. & Krokstad, J., 2012. "Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 44-63.
    6. Guanche, R. & de Andrés, A.D. & Simal, P.D. & Vidal, C. & Losada, I.J., 2014. "Uncertainty analysis of wave energy farms financial indicators," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 570-580.
    7. Marcos Blanco & Pablo Moreno-Torres & Marcos Lafoz & Dionisio Ramírez, 2015. "Design Parameters Analysis of Point Absorber WEC via an evolutionary-algorithm-based Dimensioning Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2020. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the optimisation algorithm and the geometry definition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    10. Chen, Qiang & Zang, Jun & Birchall, Jonathan & Ning, Dezhi & Zhao, Xuanlie & Gao, Junliang, 2020. "On the hydrodynamic performance of a vertical pile-restrained WEC-type floating breakwater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 414-425.
    11. Teillant, Boris & Costello, Ronan & Weber, Jochem & Ringwood, John, 2012. "Productivity and economic assessment of wave energy projects through operational simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 220-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2021. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the objective functions and the optimisation formulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Alireza Shadmani & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Riyadh I. Al-Raoush & Nasrin Alamdari & Amir H. Gandomi, 2022. "The Optimal Configuration of Wave Energy Conversions Respective to the Nearshore Wave Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Cotten, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2022. "Multi-objective optimisation of a sloped-motion, multibody wave energy converter concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 307-320.
    5. Guo, Bingyong & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Geometric optimisation of wave energy conversion devices: A survey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    6. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Cheng, Yong & Xi, Chen & Dai, Saishuai & Ji, Chunyan & Collu, Maurizio & Li, Mingxin & Yuan, Zhiming & Incecik, Atilla, 2022. "Wave energy extraction and hydroelastic response reduction of modular floating breakwaters as array wave energy converters integrated into a very large floating structure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    8. Choupin, Ophelie & Henriksen, Michael & Tomlinson, Rodger, 2022. "Interrelationship between variables for wave direction-dependent WEC/site-configuration pairs using the CapEx method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Roberts, Owain & Noble, Donald R. & Henderson, Jillian Catherine & Jeffrey, Henry, 2022. "Design limits for wave energy converters based on the relationship of power and volume obtained through multi-objective optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 492-504.
    10. Ophelie Choupin & Michael Henriksen & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodger Tomlinson, 2021. "Breaking-Down and Parameterising Wave Energy Converter Costs Using the CapEx and Similitude Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet & Jørgen Hals Todalshaug & Patrik Möller & David Bould & Henry Jeffrey, 2016. "Techno-Economic Related Metrics for a Wave Energy Converters Feasibility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Morim, Joao & Cartwright, Nick & Hemer, Mark & Etemad-Shahidi, Amir & Strauss, Darrell, 2019. "Inter- and intra-annual variability of potential power production from wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1224-1241.
    13. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2020. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the optimisation algorithm and the geometry definition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2018. "Ocean Wave Energy Converters: Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Coe, Ryan G. & Ahn, Seongho & Neary, Vincent S. & Kobos, Peter H. & Bacelli, Giorgio, 2021. "Maybe less is more: Considering capacity factor, saturation, variability, and filtering effects of wave energy devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    16. Marcos Blanco & Pablo Moreno-Torres & Marcos Lafoz & Dionisio Ramírez, 2015. "Design Parameters Analysis of Point Absorber WEC via an evolutionary-algorithm-based Dimensioning Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    17. Daniel Clemente & Felipe Teixeira-Duarte & Paulo Rosa-Santos & Francisco Taveira-Pinto, 2023. "Advancements on Optimization Algorithms Applied to Wave Energy Assessment: An Overview on Wave Climate and Energy Resource," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-28, June.
    18. Jin, Huaqing & Zhang, Haicheng & Xu, Daolin & Jun, Ding & Ze, Sun, 2022. "Low-frequency energy capture and water wave attenuation of a hybrid WEC-breakwater with nonlinear stiffness," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1029-1047.
    19. Chandrasekaran, Srinivasan & Sricharan, V.V.S., 2020. "Numerical analysis of a new multi-body floating wave energy converter with a linear power take-off system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 250-271.
    20. Goggins, Jamie & Finnegan, William, 2014. "Shape optimisation of floating wave energy converters for a specified wave energy spectrum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 208-220.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:343:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923005962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.