IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v341y2023ics0306261923004609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PyPSA-Earth. A new global open energy system optimization model demonstrated in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Parzen, Maximilian
  • Abdel-Khalek, Hazem
  • Fedotova, Ekaterina
  • Mahmood, Matin
  • Frysztacki, Martha Maria
  • Hampp, Johannes
  • Franken, Lukas
  • Schumm, Leon
  • Neumann, Fabian
  • Poli, Davide
  • Kiprakis, Aristides
  • Fioriti, Davide

Abstract

Macro-energy system modelling is used by decision-makers to steer the global energy transition towards an affordable, sustainable and reliable future. Closed-source models are the current standard for most policy and industry decisions. However, open models have proven to be competitive alternatives that promote science, robust technical analysis, collaboration and transparent policy decision-making. Yet, two issues slow the adoption: open models are often designed with particular geographic scope in mind, thus hindering synergies from collaborating, or are based on low spatially resolved data, limiting their use. Here we introduce PyPSA-Earth, an open-source global energy system model with data in high spatial and temporal resolution. It enables large-scale collaboration by providing a tool that can model the world’s energy system or any subset of it. The model is suitable for operational as well as combined generation, storage and transmission expansion studies. In this study, the novel power system capabilities of PyPSA-Earth are highlighted and demonstrated. The model provides two main features: (1) customizable data extraction and preparation with global coverage and (2) a PyPSA energy modelling framework integration. The data includes electricity demand, generation and medium to high-voltage networks from open sources, yet additional data can be further integrated. A broad range of clustering and grid meshing strategies help adapt the model to computational and practical needs. Data validation for the entire African continent is performed and the optimization features are tested with a 2060 net-zero planning study for Nigeria. The demonstration shows that the presented developments can build a highly detailed power system model for energy planning studies to support policy and technical decision-making. We anticipate that PyPSA-Earth can represent an open reference model for system planning, and we welcome joining forces to address the challenges of the energy transition together.

Suggested Citation

  • Parzen, Maximilian & Abdel-Khalek, Hazem & Fedotova, Ekaterina & Mahmood, Matin & Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hampp, Johannes & Franken, Lukas & Schumm, Leon & Neumann, Fabian & Poli, Davide & Kiprakis, 2023. "PyPSA-Earth. A new global open energy system optimization model demonstrated in Africa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:341:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923004609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923004609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Victoria & Kun Zhu & Tom Brown & Gorm B. Andresen & Martin Greiner, 2020. "Early decarbonisation of the European energy system pays off," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Jacobson, Mark Z. & von Krauland, Anna-Katharina & Coughlin, Stephen J. & Palmer, Frances C. & Smith, Miles M., 2022. "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 430-442.
    3. Galina Alova & Philipp A. Trotter & Alex Money, 2021. "A machine-learning approach to predicting Africa’s electricity mix based on planned power plants and their chances of success," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 158-166, February.
    4. Juyoul Kim & Ahmed Abdel-Hameed & Soja Reuben Joseph & Hilali Hussein Ramadhan & Mercy Nandutu & Joung-Hyuk Hyun, 2021. "Modeling Long-Term Electricity Generation Planning to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Solbrekke, Ida Marie, 2018. "A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 440-459.
    6. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hörsch, Jonas & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2021. "The strong effect of network resolution on electricity system models with high shares of wind and solar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    7. Neumann, Fabian & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2022. "Assessments of linear power flow and transmission loss approximations in coordinated capacity expansion problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    8. Martin Kueppers & Christian Perau & Marco Franken & Hans Joerg Heger & Matthias Huber & Michael Metzger & Stefan Niessen, 2020. "Data-Driven Regionalization of Decarbonized Energy Systems for Reflecting Their Changing Topologies in Planning and Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Reichenberg, Lina & Hedenus, Fredrik & Mattsson, Niclas & Verendel, Vilhelm, 2022. "Deep decarbonization and the supergrid – Prospects for electricity transmission between Europe and China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    10. Hannah Ritchie, 2021. "COVID’s lessons for climate, sustainability and more from Our World in Data," Nature, Nature, vol. 598(7879), pages 9-9, October.
    11. Riepin, Iegor & Schmidt, Matthew & Baringo, Luis & Müsgens, Felix, 2022. "Adaptive robust optimization for European strategic gas infrastructure planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Stefan Pfenninger, 2017. "Energy scientists must show their workings," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7642), pages 393-393, February.
    13. Maximilian Parzen & Fabian Neumann & Addrian H. Van Der Weijde & Daniel Friedrich & Aristides Kiprakis, 2021. "Beyond cost reduction: Improving the value of energy storage in electricity systems," Papers 2101.10092, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danial Esmaeili Aliabadi & David Manske & Lena Seeger & Reinhold Lehneis & Daniela Thrän, 2023. "Integrating Knowledge Acquisition, Visualization, and Dissemination in Energy System Models: BENOPTex Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Bandarin & Enrico Ciciotti & Marco Cremaschi & Giovanna Madera & Paolo Perulli & Diana Shendrikova, 2020. "Which Future for Cities after COVID-19 An international Survey," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, October.
    2. Leonard Goke & Jens Weibezahn & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2021. "A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios," Papers 2112.04821, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    3. Neumann, Fabian & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2022. "Assessments of linear power flow and transmission loss approximations in coordinated capacity expansion problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Stöckl, Fabian & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2021. "Optimal supply chains and power sector benefits of green hydrogen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11.
    5. Wiese, Frauke & Schlecht, Ingmar & Bunke, Wolf-Dieter & Gerbaulet, Clemens & Hirth, Lion & Jahn, Martin & Kunz, Friedrich & Lorenz, Casimir & Mühlenpfordt, Jonathan & Reimann, Juliane & Schill, Wolf-P, 2019. "Open Power System Data – Frictionless data for electricity system modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 401-409.
    6. Keck, Felix & Jütte, Silke & Lenzen, Manfred & Li, Mengyu, 2022. "Assessment of two optimisation methods for renewable energy capacity expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    7. Raventós, Oriol & Dengiz, Thomas & Medjroubi, Wided & Unaichi, Chinonso & Bruckmeier, Andreas & Finck, Rafael, 2022. "Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Grochowicz, Aleksander & van Greevenbroek, Koen & Benth, Fred Espen & Zeyringer, Marianne, 2023. "Intersecting near-optimal spaces: European power systems with more resilience to weather variability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Abuzayed, Anas & Hartmann, Niklas, 2022. "MyPyPSA-Ger: Introducing CO2 taxes on a multi-regional myopic roadmap of the German electricity system towards achieving the 1.5 °C target by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    10. Niwagira Daniel & Juyoul Kim, 2022. "A Study on Integrating SMRs into Uganda’s Future Energy System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Lombardi, Francesco & Rocco, Matteo Vincenzo & Colombo, Emanuela, 2019. "A multi-layer energy modelling methodology to assess the impact of heat-electricity integration strategies: The case of the residential cooking sector in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1249-1260.
    12. Nicolò Golinucci & Nicolò Stevanato & Federica Inzoli & Mohammad Amin Tahavori & Negar Namazifard & Lamya Hussain & Benedetta Camilli & Matteo Vincenzo Rocco & Emanuela Colombo, 2020. "Comprehensive and Integrated Impact Assessment Framework for Development Policies Evaluation: Definition and Application To Kenya," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, November.
    13. Fabian Scheller & Frauke Wiese & Jann Michael Weinand & Dominik Franjo Dominkovi'c & Russell McKenna, 2021. "An expert survey to assess the current status and future challenges of energy system analysis," Papers 2106.15518, arXiv.org.
    14. Candas, Soner & Muschner, Christoph & Buchholz, Stefanie & Bramstoft, Rasmus & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Hainsch, Karlo & Löffler, Konstantin & Günther, Stephan & Berendes, Sarah & Nguyen, Stefanie & Jus, 2022. "Code exposed: Review of five open-source frameworks for modeling renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon & Breyer, Christian, 2023. "Hierarchical approach to energy system modelling: Complexity reduction with minor changes in results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    16. Süsser, Diana & Gaschnig, Hannes & Ceglarz, Andrzej & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Flamos, Alexandros & Lilliestam, Johan, 2022. "Better suited or just more complex? On the fit between user needs and modeller-driven improvements of energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    17. Abdin, Adam F. & Caunhye, Aakil & Zio, Enrico & Cardin, Michel-Alexandre, 2022. "Optimizing generation expansion planning with operational uncertainty: A multistage adaptive robust approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    18. Morstyn, Thomas & Collett, Katherine A. & Vijay, Avinash & Deakin, Matthew & Wheeler, Scot & Bhagavathy, Sivapriya M. & Fele, Filiberto & McCulloch, Malcolm D., 2020. "OPEN: An open-source platform for developing smart local energy system applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    19. Sander Claeys & Marta Vanin & Frederik Geth & Geert Deconinck, 2021. "Applications of optimization models for electricity distribution networks," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), September.
    20. Nathalie Spittler & Ganna Gladkykh & Arnaud Diemer & Brynhildur Davidsdottir, 2019. "Understanding the Current Energy Paradigm and Energy System Models for More Sustainable Energy System Development," Post-Print hal-02127724, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:341:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923004609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.