IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v255y2021ics0378377421002651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconstruction of remotely sensed daily evapotranspiration data in cloudy-sky conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Lisheng
  • Bateni, Sayed M.
  • Xu, Yanhao
  • Xu, Tongren
  • He, Xinlei
  • Ki, Seo Jin
  • Liu, Shaomin
  • Ma, Minguo
  • Yang, Yang

Abstract

The unavailability of thermal infrared satellite observations in cloudy conditions has limited the spatial distribution and temporal coverage of remotely sensed evapotranspiration (ET) data. As a result, a number of approaches have been developed to reconstruct remotely sensed daily ET data in cloudy-sky conditions. Despite the wide application of these approaches, no work has been conducted to compare their performance over a wide variety of climatic and vegetative conditions. In this study, three commonly used ET reconstruction approaches namely, reference ET fraction (EToF), land surface temperature reconstruction (LSTR), and variational data assimilation (VDA) are used to obtain daily ET data under cloudy conditions. The abovementioned three approaches are applied to the Heihe River Basin (HRB) in the northwest of China during the growing season in 2015. The HRB covers an area of approximately 1,432,000 km2 and contains various land covers. The large aperture scintillometer (LAS) and eddy covariance (EC) measurements are used to evaluate performance of the abovementioned three methods over the grassland, cropland, and riparian forest sites in the HRB. The results show that the EToF approach underestimates ET at the grassland and riparian sites in cloudy days because of the negatively biased ET/ETo (where ETo is the reference evapotranspiration) in clear-sky days. The VDA approach overestimates ET in cloudy-sky conditions because of the overpredicted evaporative fraction values. The LSTR approach overestimates ET due to the under-reconstructed LST in cloudy day. The mean absolute percentage difference (MAPD) and root mean square error (RMSE) statistical metrics are used to compare performance of the three approaches The LSTR (MAPD = 43.1% and RMSE = 1.3 mm/day) and VDA (MAPD = 46.7% and RMSE = 1.4 mm/day) approaches slightly outperform EToF (MAPD = 46.6% and RMSE = 1.5 mm/day). The RMSEs of reconstructed ET values by EToF, VDA, and LSTR increase respectively from 1.6, 1.2, and 1.5 (mm/day) to 2.2, 1.9, and 2.0 (mm/day) as the number of consecutive cloudy days increases from 1 to 3. These outcomes suggest that synergistic use of space-borne microwave and thermal infrared LST observations into remote sensing-based ET methods can improve the reconstruction of ET data under cloudy conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Lisheng & Bateni, Sayed M. & Xu, Yanhao & Xu, Tongren & He, Xinlei & Ki, Seo Jin & Liu, Shaomin & Ma, Minguo & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Reconstruction of remotely sensed daily evapotranspiration data in cloudy-sky conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:255:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421002651
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Jung & Markus Reichstein & Philippe Ciais & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Justin Sheffield & Michael L. Goulden & Gordon Bonan & Alessandro Cescatti & Jiquan Chen & Richard de Jeu & A. Johannes Dolman, 2010. "Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7318), pages 951-954, October.
    2. Hemakumara, H. M. & Chandrapala, Lalith & Moene, Arnold F., 2003. "Evapotranspiration fluxes over mixed vegetation areas measured from large aperture scintillometer," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 109-122, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo M Holdo, 2013. "Revisiting the Two-Layer Hypothesis: Coexistence of Alternative Functional Rooting Strategies in Savannas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Tao, Hai & Diop, Lamine & Bodian, Ansoumana & Djaman, Koffi & Ndiaye, Papa Malick & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2018. "Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 140-151.
    3. Zhang, Yixiao & He, Tao & Liang, Shunlin & Zhao, Zhongguo, 2023. "A framework for estimating actual evapotranspiration through spatial heterogeneity-based machine learning approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    4. Yuanfang Chai & Yao Yue & Louise J. Slater & Jiabo Yin & Alistair G. L. Borthwick & Tiexi Chen & Guojie Wang, 2022. "Constrained CMIP6 projections indicate less warming and a slower increase in water availability across Asia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Qiutong Zhang & Jinling Kong & Lizheng Wang & Xixuan Wang & Zaiyong Zhang & Yizhu Jiang & Yanling Zhong, 2024. "A Dual-Source Energy Balance Model Coupled with Jarvis Canopy Resistance for Estimating Surface Evapotranspiration in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Huang, Suo & Bartlett, Paul & Arain, M. Altaf, 2016. "An analysis of global terrestrial carbon, water and energy dynamics using the carbon–nitrogen coupled CLASS-CTEMN+ model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 36-56.
    7. Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. & Chandrapala, L., 2003. "Water balance variability across Sri Lanka for assessing agricultural and environmental water use," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 171-192, February.
    8. Wu, Genan & Lu, Xinchen & Zhao, Wei & Cao, Ruochen & Xie, Wenqi & Wang, Liyun & Wang, Qiuhong & Song, Jiexuan & Gao, Shaobo & Li, Shenggong & Hu, Zhongmin, 2023. "The increasing contribution of greening to the terrestrial evapotranspiration in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    9. Allen Hunt & Boris Faybishenko & Behzad Ghanbarian & Markus Egli & Fang Yu, 2020. "Predicting Water Cycle Characteristics from Percolation Theory and Observational Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Aakash Singh & Anurag Kanaujia & Vivek Kumar Singh & Ricardo Vinuesa, 2024. "Artificial intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: Bibliometric patterns and concept evolution trajectories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 724-754, February.
    11. Yu, Xingjiao & Qian, Long & Wang, Wen’e & Hu, Xiaotao & Dong, Jianhua & Pi, Yingying & Fan, Kai, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation of terrestrial evapotranspiration from different models under extreme condition over conterminous United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    12. Zhou, Li & Wang, Yu & Jia, Qingyu & Li, Rongping & Zhou, Mengzi & Zhou, Guangsheng, 2019. "Evapotranspiration over a rainfed maize field in northeast China: How are relationships between the environment and terrestrial evapotranspiration mediated by leaf area?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 538-546.
    13. Akash Koppa & Dominik Rains & Petra Hulsman & Rafael Poyatos & Diego G. Miralles, 2022. "A deep learning-based hybrid model of global terrestrial evaporation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Zhang, Yu & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Niu, Xiaotao & Shao, Guomin, 2023. "Evaluating maize evapotranspiration using high-resolution UAV-based imagery and FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    15. Urszula Somorowska, 2022. "Changes in Terrestrial Evaporation across Poland over the Past Four Decades Dominated by Increases in Summer Months," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Chandrapala, Lalith & Wimalasuriya, Malika, 2003. "Satellite measurements supplemented with meteorological data to operationally estimate evaporation in Sri Lanka," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 89-107, February.
    17. Feng, Jiaojiao & Wang, Weizhen & Xu, Feinan & Wang, Shengtang, 2024. "Evaluating the ability of deep learning on actual daily evapotranspiration estimation over the heterogeneous surfaces," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    18. Songbai Hong & Jinzhi Ding & Fei Kan & Hao Xu & Shaoyuan Chen & Yitong Yao & Shilong Piao, 2023. "Asymmetry of carbon sequestrations by plant and soil after forestation regulated by soil nitrogen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Pauwels, Valentijn R.N. & Samson, Roeland, 2006. "Comparison of different methods to measure and model actual evapotranspiration rates for a wet sloping grassland," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(1-2), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Sainte-Marie, J. & Saint-André, L. & Nouvellon, Y. & Laclau, J.-P. & Roupsard, O. & le Maire, G. & Delpierre, N. & Henrot, A. & Barrandon, M., 2014. "A new probabilistic canopy dynamics model (SLCD) that is suitable for evergreen and deciduous forest ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 121-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:255:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.