IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v252y2021ics0378377421001761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the TDR technique for the determination of the dynamics of the spatial and temporal distribution of water uptake by plant roots during injection irrigation

Author

Listed:
  • Janik, Grzegorz
  • Kłosowicz, Izabela
  • Walczak, Amadeusz
  • Adamczewska-Sowińska, Katarzyna
  • Jama-Rodzeńska, Anna
  • Sowiński, Józef

Abstract

The objective of the study was to develop a method for precise estimation of spatial and temporal variation in the elementary uptake of water by roots of an irrigated plant. The project focused on plants irrigated in a unique way, consisting in injection application of water directly within the reach of the root system. The analyses were conducted on the basis of a study performed in controlled conditions, on a cubicoid physical model with dimensions of 27.00 × 30.75 × 30.75 cm. The subject of the study was butterhead lettuce of the crisphead type (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L.). TDR sensors were installed in the substrate in which lettuce was cultivated, for the purpose of measurement of volumetric moisture. During the period of the experiment (28 days), the values of volumetric moisture were recorded at 10-minute intervals, at 12 points in each 4.5 cm layer of the substrate. The analyses demonstrated that the maximum (as an average for the entire volume of soil within a plant root system) intensity of elementary water uptake by lettuce (maxIc∆t) was 0.0006 cm3cm−3h−1. This was observed at around midday and when the plant is being irrigated. The values of elementary intensity of water uptake by plant roots in each soil volume Ii,j,k∆t were highly varied. At the point situated the closest to the nozzle of the irrigation injector the maximum value was 0.008 cm3cm−3h−1. In a soil volume situated only 5 cm further away the maximum value was already only 0.003 cm3cm−3h−1. In many elementary soil volumes did not pick those values up. Diurnal values of Ii,j,k∆t calculated for an injection dose of 100 cm3 were, at the same points, lower than for the dose of 200 cm3. The presented method permits the acquisition of information on spatial variation and on the dynamics of the elementary intensity of water uptake by roots, which is necessary for precise determination of the location and dose of injection from the nozzle of a high-pressure irrigation injector.

Suggested Citation

  • Janik, Grzegorz & Kłosowicz, Izabela & Walczak, Amadeusz & Adamczewska-Sowińska, Katarzyna & Jama-Rodzeńska, Anna & Sowiński, Józef, 2021. "Application of the TDR technique for the determination of the dynamics of the spatial and temporal distribution of water uptake by plant roots during injection irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001761
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001761
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soppe, R. W. O. & Ayars, J. E., 2003. "Characterizing ground water use by safflower using weighing lysimeters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 59-71, April.
    2. Satchithanantham, S. & Krahn, V. & Sri Ranjan, R. & Sager, S., 2014. "Shallow groundwater uptake and irrigation water redistribution within the potato root zone," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Ahuja, Lajpat R. & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Ma, Liwang & Marek, Gary & Evett, Steven R. & Howell, Terry A., 2016. "Simulation of crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficients with data in weighing lysimeters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 274-283.
    4. Green, Steve R. & Kirkham, M.B. & Clothier, Brent E., 2006. "Root uptake and transpiration: From measurements and models to sustainable irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 165-176, November.
    5. Starr, G.C. & Rowland, D. & Griffin, T.S. & Olanya, O.M., 2008. "Soil water in relation to irrigation, water uptake and potato yield in a humid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 292-300, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yuehong & Li, Xianyue & Šimůnek, Jirí & Shi, Haibin & Chen, Ning & Hu, Qi & Tian, Tong, 2021. "Evaluating soil salt dynamics in a field drip-irrigated with brackish water and leached with freshwater during different crop growth stages," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Shahadha, Saadi Sattar & Wendroth, Ole & Zhu, Junfeng & Walton, Jason, 2019. "Can measured soil hydraulic properties simulate field water dynamics and crop production?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and water productivity of rainfed maize under contrasting mulching conditions in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Zhou, Zhenjiang & Plauborg, Finn & Parsons, David & Andersen, Mathias Neumann, 2018. "Potato canopy growth, yield and soil water dynamics under different irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 9-18.
    5. Margarita A. Petoussi & Nicolas Kalogerakis, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling of Pilot Scale Olive Mill Wastewater Phytoremediation Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-36, May.
    6. Fabio V. Difonzo & Costantino Masciopinto & Michele Vurro & Marco Berardi, 2021. "Shooting the Numerical Solution of Moisture Flow Equation with Root Water Uptake Models: A Python Tool," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(8), pages 2553-2567, June.
    7. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Talebnejad, R. & Sepaskhah, A.R., 2015. "Effect of deficit irrigation and different saline groundwater depths on yield and water productivity of quinoa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 225-238.
    9. Cai, Fu & Zhang, Yushu & Mi, Na & Ming, Huiqing & Zhang, Shujie & Zhang, Hui & Zhao, Xianli, 2020. "Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Gou, Qiqi & Zhu, Yonghua & Horton, Robert & Lü, Haishen & Wang, Zhenlong & Su, Jianbin & Cui, Chenyun & Zhang, Haoqiang & Wang, Xiaoyi & Zheng, Jingyao & Yuan, Fei, 2020. "Effect of climate change on the contribution of groundwater to the root zone of winter wheat in the Huaibei Plain of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Xu, Gaoping & Xue, Xuzhang & Wang, Pu & Yang, Zhaoshun & Yuan, Wenya & Liu, Xiufeng & Lou, Chenjun, 2018. "A lysimeter study for the effects of different canopy sizes on evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of summer maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1-6.
    12. Liu, Zhongyi & Chen, Hang & Huo, Zailin & Wang, Fengxin & Shock, Clinton C., 2016. "Analysis of the contribution of groundwater to evapotranspiration in an arid irrigation district with shallow water table," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 131-141.
    13. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Fisher, Daniel K. & Reddy, Krishna N. & Rajan, Nithya & Pinnamaneni, Srinivasa Rao, 2019. "Modeling evapotranspiration for irrigation water management in a humid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    14. Amanda M. Nelson & Nicolas E. Quintana Ashwell & Christopher D. Delhom & Drew M. Gholson, 2022. "Leveraging Big Data to Preserve the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer: A Blueprint for the National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Gao, Xiaoyu & Huo, Zailin & Xu, Xu & Qu, Zhongyi & Huang, Guanhua & Tang, Pengcheng & Bai, Yining, 2018. "Shallow groundwater plays an important role in enhancing irrigation water productivity in an arid area: The perspective from a regional agricultural hydrology simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 43-58.
    16. Tianyi Yang & Haichao Yu & Sien Li & Xiangning Yuan & Xiang Ao & Haochong Chen & Yuexin Wang & Jie Ding, 2024. "Driving Factors and Numerical Simulation of Evapotranspiration of a Typical Cabbage Agroecosystem in the Shiyang River Basin, Northwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Devkota, Krishna Prasad & Devkota, Mina & Rezaei, Meisam & Oosterbaan, Roland, 2022. "Managing salinity for sustainable agricultural production in salt-affected soils of irrigated drylands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Ghamarnia, Houshang & Gholamian, Mohsen, 2013. "The effect of saline shallow ground and surface water under deficit irrigation on (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in semi arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 29-37.
    19. Hou, Lizhu & Wenninger, Jochen & Shen, Jiangen & Zhou, Yangxiao & Bao, Han & Liu, Haijun, 2014. "Assessing crop coefficients for Zea mays in the semi-arid Hailiutu River catchment, northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 37-47.
    20. Wei, Shiyu & Kuang, Naikun & Jiao, Fengli & Zong, Rui & Li, Quanqi, 2023. "Exploring the effects of subsoiling tillage under various irrigation regimes on the evapotranspiration and crop water productivity of winter wheat using RZWQM2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.