IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2017-03-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on Economic Factors Affecting Corporate Social Responsibility in Private Organizations; Case Study: Private Organizations in West Azerbaijan Province

Author

Listed:
  • Mahrokh Lotfollahi Haghi

    (Candidate in Public Management, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran,)

  • Mehraban Hadi Peikani

    (Faculty Member, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran,)

  • Akbar Etebarian

    (Faculty Member, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.)

Abstract

Businesses nowadays have perceived that social issues must be taken seriously. One major requirement for corporations to survive in the global world and acquire a larger market share along with competitive advantage toward a competitive economy is observing social responsibility in businesses. Developing countries, however, require further consideration of the basics needed for social responsibility and creation of necessary incentives to remove barriers and overcome challenges. Corporate social responsibility offers solutions to be used in the business environment and respond the expectations of the society in the fields of law, ethics, business and community for organizations have huge environmental, social and economic responsibility toward their employees, stockholders, clients, governments, suppliers and all other beneficiaries. Needless to say that individuals, groups, institutions and organizations feeling responsible toward their society and its crises and problems through doing their best to tackle them will decrease problems significantly and improve the quality of life. The present study is an applied research conducted through descriptive analytical method. The data for the study were collected via library studies and questionnaires in private organizations of West Azerbaijan province and the data collected were analyzed descriptively and analytically. Statistical population of the study included all 3011 private companies in West Azerbaijan province from among which 340 companies were selected randomly according to simple table or Krejcie and Morgan table as statistical sample. The data were collected via a valid and reliable questionnaire and were then analyzed using SPSS 22 computer application. Results from the study revealed that 5 factors of following economic procedures for employees, economic interaction strategies for suppliers, financial management and marketing for customers, using environment friendly production resources elaborated an overall 61.656% of the variance of the economic factors affecting corporate social responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahrokh Lotfollahi Haghi & Mehraban Hadi Peikani & Akbar Etebarian, 2017. "Analysis on Economic Factors Affecting Corporate Social Responsibility in Private Organizations; Case Study: Private Organizations in West Azerbaijan Province," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 206-212.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-03-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/4843/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/4843/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, David Han-Min & Chen, Pei-Hua & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Hsiao, Chih-Yi, 2015. "The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand equity and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2232-2236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahabubur Rahman & M. Ángeles Rodríguez-Serrano & Mary Lambkin, 2019. "Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 691-704, November.
    2. Judit Creixans-Tenas & Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Núria Arimany-Serrat, 2020. "Social Responsibility, Communication and Financial Data of Hospitals: A Structural Modelling Approach in a Sustainability Scope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Shuxia Zhang & Liping Xu & Ning Liu, 2022. "Crowding‐in and crowding‐out effects of corporate philanthropy on R&D investment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1835-1849, September.
    4. Wioleta Kucharska & Rafał Kowalczyk, 2019. "How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 453-467, March.
    5. Mahabubur Rahman & Saqib Aziz & Mathew Hughes, 2020. "The product‐market performance benefits of environmental policy: Why customer awareness and firm innovativeness matter," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2001-2018, July.
    6. Liu, Mingzhi & Shi, Yulin & Wilson, Craig & Wu, Zhenyu, 2017. "Does family involvement explain why corporate social responsibility affects earnings management?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 8-16.
    7. Raiswa Saha & Shashi & Roberto Cerchione & Rajwinder Singh & Richa Dahiya, 2020. "Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 409-429, March.
    8. Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Petra Poulova, 2021. "Do ESG Endeavors Assist Firms in Achieving Superior Financial Performance? A Case of 100 Best Corporate Citizens," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    9. Ghanbarpour, Tohid & Gustafsson, Anders, 2022. "How do corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovativeness increase financial gains? A customer perspective analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 471-481.
    10. Govindan, Kannan & Rajeev, A. & Padhi, Sidhartha S. & Pati, Rupesh K., 2020. "Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: A meta-analysis of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Maximilian Schnippering, 2020. "R&D: the missing link between corporate social performance and financial performance?," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 243-255, May.
    12. Ijaz Hussain & Shaohong Mu & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Rizwan Qaiser Danish & Shrafat Ali Sair, 2020. "Effects of Sustainable Brand Equity and Marketing Innovation on Market Performance in Hospitality Industry: Mediating Effects of Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Mochales, Gerardo & Blanch, Javier, 2022. "Unlocking the potential of CSR: An explanatory model to determine the strategic character of CSR activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 310-323.
    14. Chen, Chung-Jen & Guo, Ruey-Shan & Hsiao, Yung-Chang & Chen, Kuo-Liang, 2018. "How business strategy in non-financial firms moderates the curvilinear effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on corporate financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 154-167.
    15. Swaen, Valérie & Demoulin, Nathalie & Pauwels-Delassus, Véronique, 2021. "Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 709-721.
    16. Kumar Ramesh & Raiswa Saha & Susoban Goswami & Sekar & Richa Dahiya, 2019. "Consumer's response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 377-387, March.
    17. Ioanna Kountouri & Eleftherios Manousakis & Andrianos E. Tsekrekos, 2019. "Latent semantic analysis of corporate social responsibility reports (with an application to Hellenic firms)," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Komath, Muhammed Aslam Chelery & Doğan, Murat & Sayılır, Özlem, 2023. "Impact of corporate governance and related controversies on the market value of banks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Chih‐Wei Peng, 2020. "The role of business strategy and CEO compensation structure in driving corporate social responsibility: Linkage towards a sustainable development perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1028-1039, March.
    20. Asit Bhattacharyya & Sue Wright & Md Lutfur Rahman, 2021. "Is better banking performance associated with financial inclusion and mandated CSR expenditure in a developing country?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 125-161, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Factors; Corporate Social Responsibility; Private Organizations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-03-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.