IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2021-01-37.html

The Economic Cost and Environmental Effects of Paper Consumption and Computers Usage

Author

Listed:
  • Yousef Abdel Latif Abdel Jawad

    (Al-Quds Open University, Palastine)

  • Shaker Zabada

    (An-Najah National University, Palastine,)

  • Issam Ayyash

    (Palestine Technical University, Palastine.)

Abstract

The study is aimed at investigating the environmental and economic impacts of paper consumption and computers used in the banking sector operating in Palestine. The descriptive and quantitative method has been used, and the data was annual covering the period 2016-2018. The study has found out that the total cost of using paper in banks operating in Palestine was about 3.24 million dollars since the banks consume about 658.4 tons of paper as it is necessary to produce this amount of paper to about 16 thousand pine trees, 25 million btus of energy, and 13.5 million gallons. As for the total costs of using computers in the banks operating in Palestine, they amounted to about 7.6 million US dollars, and about 122 tons of different minerals and materials are required to manufacture computers in the banks in Palestine. About 1.52 GW per year is required to operate all computers, which causes the release of greenhouse gases equivalent to the consumption of 2495 barrels of oil.

Suggested Citation

  • Yousef Abdel Latif Abdel Jawad & Shaker Zabada & Issam Ayyash, 2021. "The Economic Cost and Environmental Effects of Paper Consumption and Computers Usage," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 302-307.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-01-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/10375/5594
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/10375/5594
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Eygen, Emile & De Meester, Steven & Tran, Ha Phuong & Dewulf, Jo, 2016. "Resource savings by urban mining: The case of desktop and laptop computers in Belgium," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Yan & Xu, Zhenming, 2016. "Precious metals recovery from waste printed circuit boards: A review for current status and perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 28-39.
    2. Stotz, Philippe Maurice & Niero, Monia & Bey, Niki & Paraskevas, Dimos, 2017. "Environmental screening of novel technologies to increase material circularity: A case study on aluminium cans," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 96-106.
    3. Huimin Liu & Mengqian Xu & Xuexi Yang & Yan Shi & Min Deng, 2023. "Spatial Layout Assessment of Urban Mining Pilot Bases in China Based on Multi-Source Data Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Abhishek Singh & Anuradha Yadav & Thanh Tiep Le & Shaina Singh, 2023. "Recycling of Electronic Waste for Circular Economy Goals: Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 145-161, December.
    5. Mango, Francisco & Vincent, Rose Camille, 2025. "Does polycentric climate governance drive the circular economy? Evidence from subnational spending and dematerialization of production in the EU," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Panchal, Rohit & Singh, Anju & Diwan, Hema, 2021. "Economic potential of recycling e-waste in India and its impact on import of materials," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Bigum, M. & Damgaard, A. & Scheutz, C. & Christensen, T.H., 2017. "Environmental impacts and resource losses of incinerating misplaced household special wastes (WEEE, batteries, ink cartridges and cables)," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 251-260.
    8. Amit Kumar & Maria Holuszko, 2016. "Electronic Waste and Existing Processing Routes: A Canadian Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Christoph Helbig & Jonas Huether & Charlotte Joachimsthaler & Christian Lehmann & Simone Raatz & Andrea Thorenz & Martin Faulstich & Axel Tuma, 2022. "A terminology for downcycling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1164-1174, August.
    10. Sigrid Kusch & Colin D. Hills, 2017. "The Link between e-Waste and GDP—New Insights from Data from the Pan-European Region," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, March.
    11. Kumar, Amit & Holuszko, Maria & Espinosa, Denise Crocce Romano, 2017. "E-waste: An overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 32-42.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • P18 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Energy; Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-01-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.