IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-02-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualisation of Mahalanobis Distances for Trivariate JOINT Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Groenewald

    (School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa)

  • Gary Van Vuuren

    (Centre for Business Mathematics and Informatics, North-West University, Potchefstroom, 2351, South Africa)

Abstract

The Mahalanobis distance is a statistical measure used to quantify the distance between elliptic distributions with distinct locations and shared shapes, while accounting for the variables' covariance structure. It is applicable to both estimative and predictive estimation approaches, where variations are limited to location, and it assesses the similarity or dissimilarity between data and the mean (centroid) of a multivariate distribution, within the family of multivariate elliptic distributions. It is thus useful for outlier identification. The aim of the study is to provide, for the first time, a three-dimensional visualisation of the Mahalanobis distance when the underlying framework comprises three jointly connected variables (rather than the standard two variables presented in textbooks). Data with Mahalanobis distances exceeding a predefined threshold, determined using a distribution, are considered outliers. This approach is analogous to identifying outliers for univariate distributions based on critical values derived from confidence levels. While the literature mainly discusses the Mahalanobis distance formulation for bivariate distributions, we extend the discussion to include one additional variable and provide a visualisation of the resulting Mahalanobis distance for a trivariate distribution. An empirical example is presented to illustrate a practical application of a trivariate Mahalanobis distance. Visualising outliers alongside other historical events within three-factor systems can offer valuable insights into the risk profile of the current environment and assess the probability of future extreme events.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Groenewald & Gary Van Vuuren, 2024. "Visualisation of Mahalanobis Distances for Trivariate JOINT Distributions," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 203-206, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-02-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/15663/7840
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/15663
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Chulwoo & Park, Frank C., 2022. "A geometric framework for covariance dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Kay I. Penny, 1996. "Appropriate Critical Values When Testing for a Single Multivariate Outlier by Using the Mahalanobis Distance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 45(1), pages 73-81, March.
    3. Mark Kritzman & Yuanzhen Li, 2010. "Skulls, Financial Turbulence, and Risk Management," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(5), pages 30-41, September.
    4. Brenton R. Clarke & Andrew Grose, 2023. "A further study comparing forward search multivariate outlier methods including ATLA with an application to clustering," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 395-420, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chari, Anusha & Garcés, Felipe & Martínez, Juan Francisco & Valenzuela, Patricio, 2024. "Sovereign credit spreads, banking fragility, and global factors," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Gyula Gyebnár & Zoltán Klimaj & László Entz & Dániel Fabó & Gábor Rudas & Péter Barsi & Lajos R Kozák, 2019. "Personalized microstructural evaluation using a Mahalanobis-distance based outlier detection strategy on epilepsy patients’ DTI data – Theory, simulations and example cases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Gökhan Akıncı & Lutfihak Alpkan & Bora Yıldız & Gaye Karacay, 2022. "The Link between Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior in a Military Organization: The Moderating Role of Climate for Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Marta Kowal & Piotr Sorokowski, 2022. "Sex Differences in Physical Attractiveness Investments: Overlooked Side of Masculinity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Petr Pleticha, . "Heterogeneity of Returns to Business R&D: What Makes a Difference?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 0.
    6. Schwertman, Neil C. & de Silva, Rapti, 2007. "Identifying outliers with sequential fences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3800-3810, May.
    7. Philipp Kruse & Eleanor Meda Chipeta & Imke Ueberschär, 2023. "What Keeps Social Entrepreneurs Happy? Exploring Personality, Work Design, External Support, and Social Impact as Resources of Social Entrepreneurs’ Mental Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    8. César Merino-Soto & Alicia Boluarte Carbajal & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano & Laura A. Nabors & Miguel Ángel Núñez-Benítez, 2022. "A New Story on the Multidimensionality of the MSPSS: Validity of the Internal Structure through Bifactor ESEM," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Louisa Lorenz & Anne Doherty & Patricia Casey, 2019. "The Role of Religion in Buffering the Impact of Stressful Life Events on Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Depressive Episodes or Adjustment Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Karl Demers‐Bélanger & Van Son Lai, 2020. "Diversification benefits of cat bonds: An in‐depth examination," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 165-228, December.
    11. Mauro Mussini, 2014. "Decomposing inequality change from the perspective of reranking and income growth between income groups," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 619-637, September.
    12. Stavros D Veresoglou & Barry Thornton & George Menexes & Andreas P Mamolos & Demetrios S Veresoglou, 2012. "Soil Fertilization Leads to a Decline in Between-Samples Variability of Microbial Community δ13C Profiles in a Grassland Fertilization Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    13. Paola Montero Ledezma, 2017. "The Growth of World Trade: The Robustness of the Evidence," Investigación & Desarrollo, Universidad Privada Boliviana, vol. 2(1), pages 5-19.
    14. Ronald Campoverde-Aguirre & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco & María Almeida-Cabrera, 2022. "Analysis of the Quality of Service in Gastronomic Festivals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Schwertman, Neil C. & Owens, Margaret Ann & Adnan, Robiah, 2004. "A simple more general boxplot method for identifying outliers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 165-174, August.
    16. Philipp Kruse & Florian Rosing, 2023. "An Experimental Investigation of Perceived Differences in Personality and Leadership Attributes of Social Entrepreneurs Compared to for Profit Entrepreneurs and Non-Profit Organisations Leaders," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(1), pages 75-110, March.
    17. Neil H. Spencer, 2009. "Overcoming the multiple‐testing problem when testing randomness," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(4), pages 543-553, September.
    18. Petr Pleticha, 2021. "Heterogeneity of Returns to Business R&D: What Makes a Difference?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 253-271.
    19. Hsiang‐Tai Lee, 2024. "Riemannian‐geometric regime‐switching covariance hedging," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 1003-1054, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mahalanobis Distance; Trivariate; Elliptic Distributions; Outliers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • E37 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-02-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.