IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/jaccma/y2014i3p51-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness Of Material Flow Cost Accounting (Mfca) In Identifying Non-Product Output Costs And Its Impact On Environmental Performance In Paper Manufacturing Companies: A Case Study In Kwa-Zulu Natal

Author

Listed:
  • Mishelle DOORASAMY

Abstract

This paper analyses the effectiveness of adopting the Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) approach to highlight non-product output costs and assist managers in their strategic decision making processes with regard to implementing cleaner production processes. Manufacturing companies spend large amounts of money investing in end-ofpipe- treatments in order to improve the environmental performance rather than adopting cleaner production technology and techniques. Cleaner production (CP) is perceived by management as a costly strategy that requires innovation with no financial returns to the company in the short-term. Conventional costing systems do not take into consideration the ‘true’ value of non-product outputs. A case study was performed on a paper and pulp manufacturing company in Kwa-Zulu Natal which provides evidence that MFCA technique highlights the value of non-product output costs enabling managers to assess the financial and environmental benefits of adopting CP techniques and technologies. The scope of this research was limited to the steam production process which generates large amounts of boiler ash containing approximately 20% of unburned coal. It had been concluded that the company should integrate MFCA with the current EMS system to ensure their future sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishelle DOORASAMY, 2014. "The Effectiveness Of Material Flow Cost Accounting (Mfca) In Identifying Non-Product Output Costs And Its Impact On Environmental Performance In Paper Manufacturing Companies: A Case Study In Kwa-Zulu," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3, pages 51-69, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:jaccma:y:2014:i:3:p:51-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/jam/article/view/2670
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Beer, Patrick & Friend, Francois, 2006. "Environmental accounting: A management tool for enhancing corporate environmental and economic performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 548-560, June.
    2. Bahar Ince & Zeynep Cetecioglu & Orhan Ince, 2011. "Pollution Prevention in the Pulp and Paper Industries," Chapters, in: Elzbieta Broniewicz (ed.), Environmental Management in Practice, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thuy Thanh Tran & Christian Herzig, 2020. "Material Flow Cost Accounting in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hörisch, Jacob & Ortas, Eduardo & Schaltegger, Stefan & Álvarez, Igor, 2015. "Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-249.
    2. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    3. Doorasamy Mishelle, 2015. "Staircase To Sustainable Development," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 53-70, June.
    4. Madjid Abbaspour & Sanaz Toutounchian & Tooraj Dana & Zahra Abedi & Solmaz Toutounchian, 2018. "Environmental Parametric Cost Model in Oil and Gas EPC Contracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Zhengjie Gao & Dayi He & Shuaifang Niu, 2021. "On What Could Chinese Mining Enterprises Achieve High-Level Environmental Performance?—Based on the fsQCA Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Tsalis, Thomas A. & Nikolaou, Ioannis E. & Konstantakopoulou, Fotini & Zhang, Ying & Evangelinos, Konstantinos I., 2020. "Evaluating the corporate environmental profile by analyzing corporate social responsibility reports," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 63-75.
    7. Nazrul Islam & Syed Khaled Rahman, 2022. "Corporate Environmental Management Accounting Practicing and Reporting in Bangladesh," Papers 2208.12541, arXiv.org.
    8. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shi-Yin Jhong, 2018. "Carbon Emissions Cost Analysis with Activity-Based Costing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Nandini E. S & Sudharani R & Suresh N, 2022. "A Study on Impact of Environmental Accounting on Profitability of Companies listed in Bombay Stock Exchange," Papers 2207.00716, arXiv.org.
    10. Muhamad Taqi & Aam Slamet Rusydiana & Nanik Kustiningsih & Irman Firmansyah, 2021. "Environmental Accounting: A Scientometric using Biblioshiny," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 369-380.
    11. Ioannis E. Nikolaou & Konstantinos I. Evangelinos, 2010. "Classifying current social responsibility accounting methods for assisting a dialogue between business and society," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(4), pages 562-580, October.
    12. Soiloor Nandini Arunima, 2020. "An Empirical Scrutiny of Environmental Accounting Reporting (EAR) and Vision 2021: A way of Environmental Protection," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 4(9), pages 113-124.
    13. Neungruthai Nickie Petcharat & Joseph M. Mula, 2012. "Towards a conceptual design for environmental and social cost identification and measurement system," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 34-54, June.
    14. Candy Lim Chiu & Jingxin Zhang & Mingrui Li & Siyu Wei & Shengnan Xu & Xiaotong Chai, 2020. "A study of environmental disclosures practices in Chinese energy industry," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Anton Shevchenko, 2021. "Do financial penalties for environmental violations facilitate improvements in corporate environmental performance? An empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1723-1734, May.
    16. Doorasamy Mishelle, 2015. "Theoretical Developments In Environmental Management Accounting And The Role And Importance Of MFCA," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 37-52, June.
    17. Quang Linh Huynh & Tran Thi Ngoc Lan, 2021. "Importance of Environmentally Managerial Accounting to Environmental and Economic Performance," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 381-388.
    18. Azhar Susanto & Meiryani Meiryani, 2019. "The impact of Environmental Accounting Information System Alignment on Firm Performance and Environmental Performance: A case of Small and Medium Enterprises s of Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 229-236.
    19. Laguir, Issam & Stekelorum, Rébecca & El Baz, Jamal, 2021. "Proactive environmental strategy and performances of third party logistics providers (TPLs): Investigating the role of eco-control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Mariana MAN & Bogdan RAVAS & Maria MACRIS, 2012. "Environment Costs: Structure And Acknowledgement. Their Dynamics In Romania After The Integration Within The European Union," Internal Auditing and Risk Management, Athenaeum University of Bucharest, vol. 2(26), pages 62-85, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:jaccma:y:2014:i:3:p:51-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Nuta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.